Lacking quality, but I liked the vapor.
Jul 30, 2016 22:18 | #1 Lacking quality, but I liked the vapor. 5D Mk IV | 24-105L | 85 1.8 | 70-200L 2.8 IS MkII | 100-400L MkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chuckie365 Goldmember  More info | Jul 30, 2016 23:25 | #3 Really like #3 but they are all great. Nice work! Few Canons...few lenses...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2016 23:39 | #5 Excellent set, number 2 is outstanding. Oshkosh is on my bucket list. When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks. These were all with the 100-400 MkII. I'm struggling with the sigma at anything past 400mm. Not 100% sure why though. I set up a test outside and it seemed to work just fine at 600mm with pretty sharp results. First day of the airshow I used it and just had too many pics I found unacceptable. I need a steadier hand I think for lower shutter speeds. The 100-400 I'm sharp at 400mm down to 1/100 though. 5D Mk IV | 24-105L | 85 1.8 | 70-200L 2.8 IS MkII | 100-400L MkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
M_Six Cream of the Crop  More info | Jul 31, 2016 00:28 | #7 carpenter wrote in post #18082339  Thanks. These were all with the 100-400 MkII. I'm struggling with the sigma at anything past 400mm. Not 100% sure why though. I set up a test outside and it seemed to work just fine at 600mm with pretty sharp results. First day of the airshow I used it and just had too many pics I found unacceptable. I need a steadier hand I think for lower shutter speeds. The 100-400 I'm sharp at 400mm down to 1/100 though. Got an airshow coming to our local airport near the end of August. I plan on having a 100-400 MkII by then for just that reason. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 31, 2016 02:21 | #8 carpenter wrote in post #18082339 Thanks. These were all with the 100-400 MkII. I'm struggling with the sigma at anything past 400mm. Not 100% sure why though. I set up a test outside and it seemed to work just fine at 600mm with pretty sharp results. First day of the airshow I used it and just had too many pics I found unacceptable. I need a steadier hand I think for lower shutter speeds. The 100-400 I'm sharp at 400mm down to 1/100 though. I own the Sigma and rented the 100-400 II last year. Although the Sigma is a good lens, the optical quality of the Canon is better. When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1081 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
