teekay wrote in post #18082632
I don't shoot much video but do occasionally want to share some clips with friends and relatives. Presently I upload them to Smugmug, which I use for my still photos, but uploading video to there is extremely slow.
So how about YouTube vs. Vimeo? I gather Youtube videos are all public, which I don't want, so I'm thinking Vimeo if it would be faster uploading.
Any thoughts?
I use both Vimeo and YouTube for different purposes.
I produce some videos that need group feedback and approval. The big advantage for me of Vimeo is that I can create a group and allow access to videos only to that group (or multiple different groups). This is superior to YouTube "unlisted" videos because I don't have to provide individual links. Members of the group can log on at any time and view all the videos I've opened to the group in a "library" format. I can also revise and re-upload a video without having to provide another link to it.
When we do select a video for public dissemination, I transfer it to YouTube.
Vimeo also gives me better control of the sharing site appearance as it "envelopes" the video. For instance, in Vimeo I can set what "suggestions for futher viewing" the viewer sees when the video ends: Nothing, my own videos, or Vimeo's library. This is a big deal for someone using a sharing site from their own website because it doesn't lead people out of their site. I can set surrounding colors, whether controls are visible, and consistent fonts. Vimeo also provides a video sales shopping basket function.
This is why Vimeo has a cost--it has provisions for professionals to use it as a professional sharing vehicle.