Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 03 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 09:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

image up-sizing

 
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Aug 03, 2016 09:03 |  #1

I've got numerous 22 MP (12.5 x 18.75) images that are stellar @ 200% magnification...I am also anal retentive about having prints capable of nose-length viewing distance.
What is the best way to up-size that 22 MP image to something in the area of 24 x 36" and maintain that same print viewing distance?


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Aug 03, 2016 09:47 |  #2

Upsizing merely increases the pixel count without any increase in detail. IOW, by upsizing pixel count by 10X on a print which is 10X larger, you merely lower the eye's ability to see individual areas of color.

Think of a photo in a newspaper vs. the same photo on the pages of National Geographic...you easily see 'dots' in the newspaper due to the 'screen' putting dots of ink on the page for color, whereas it is more difficult to see 'dots' on National Geographic. In neither case, though, might you be able to see individual eyebrow hairs.

Stated differently, in terms of detail resolution seen in a photo, if you take a top quality lens listed by photozone.de as having MTF of 3400 line-pairs of resolution in a 22MPixel camera (5DIII), increasing its vertical pixel count from native 3840 pixels to 7680 pixels still leaves only 3400 line-pairs seen in the photo. The line edges of a line running diagonally across the photo might look less like a staircase and more like a line, though.

Using bicubic interpolation would be a perfectly fine way to get a pixel count increase, to reduce the stairstep appearance, but the edge appears less sharp, as illustrated in this example

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/jaggie_compare_zpsf825283b.jpg

Here is a 200x200 pixel horizontal line with arrowhead, and a diagonal line...
IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/original_zpsn0m3q3oc.jpg

And here is an upres of the above image to 400x400 ...
IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/upres_zpsnhr6ttmt.jpg

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 03, 2016 10:41 |  #3

Upsizing tests

More Upsizing Tests


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foodguy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,324 posts
Likes: 217
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Having too much fun in the studio
     
Aug 03, 2016 11:56 |  #4

My assistant uses Genuine Fractals to upsize for printing large. He's been pretty happy with it.


My answer for most photography questions: "it depends...'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Aug 03, 2016 13:11 |  #5

FWIW...will be farming them out...metal prints only.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Aug 04, 2016 23:24 |  #6

Give THIS (external link) a try. I use it all the time, works great.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,882 views & 2 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
image up-sizing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
909 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.