Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 08 Aug 2016 (Monday) 12:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Remote and seldom visited wilderness area in BC

 
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Aug 10, 2016 22:16 |  #16

Bcaps wrote in post #18092213 (external link)
Thanks, Archibald.

In truth I wish I had used f/22; the fewer images I need to stack the better. I find it very difficult to get a seamless blend when you have elements that are overlapping (ie, flowers and grass), and both of them are moving between shots. If in one shot the flower is very sharp but the grass directly behind it is a little soft, and in the next shot the flower is slightly soft and the grass is very sharp, but they have moved compared to the first shot, it is very difficult to get that to look right. This is especially true for elements in the very near foreground when your lens is inches from them. There just isn't a lot of room to "fudge" like there is for elements in the midground. I did have to clean up the stack and it would have been easier if the flowers and grass that were overlapping each other were sharp in one shot.

Thanks for the explanation. I don't have experience with focus stacking landscapes, just macro. And I realize the situations are very different. Certainly motion in the scene would be an issue in landscapes. So your solution is to reduce the size of the stack, and that is done by stopping down. Very well executed.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,826 views & 44 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Remote and seldom visited wilderness area in BC
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1024 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.