Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 14 Aug 2016 (Sunday) 08:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Solar Powered Charger

 
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
Post edited over 7 years ago by CameraMan. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 14, 2016 08:44 |  #1

I'm not sure if this is the proper place to put this. Mods, please move if it is in the wrong place.

So, I've been wondering what mobile photographers do to keep their phones charged up while they're away from any stationary charging locations (power receptacles, car chargers, etc.). I've been looking at some solar chargers online and read some reviews and feedbacks and haven't been convinced that this is the way to go just yet. As with most new technology there is a high failure rate with these things.

I've looked at 300,000 mAh to 30,000 mAh chargers and they all come with a disclaimer saying that they actually charge to around 18,000 mAh. So right off the bat there's some hype in the advertisement. However, some of the reviews and feedbacks I've seen say they are as good as a 1,500 mAh charger. Going WAY below the actual charging capacity in MANY cases.

Some sellers on eBay even make note of that capacity and say that you can get 3-4 charges from it when it's fully charged. If it's solar powered then you should be able to charge the charger when the sun is up. Then charge the phone at night. But the feedbacks I'm seeing there are not favorable towards these charging devices.

On the other hand I am seeing lots of positive feedbacks on these devices as well. So decisions, decisions. I may take the plunge and order one of the waterproof ones I've seen.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Aug 14, 2016 08:50 |  #2

Heya,

Solar chargers are fine. It's the battery setup that matters with them. Basically you use solar to do long chargers into a larger capacity battery (think deep cycle battery). You use that battery to recharge your devices. It will have tons of juice to recharge your phone, batteries for cameras, etc. When you're stopped some where you just throw up the solar panels and slowly recharge it. The battery will be big and heavy, but if you need enough juice to go quite a long while and the means to slowly recharge it, that will work. A lot of people do this for portable observatories and RV's, etc. It works.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Aug 14, 2016 09:59 |  #3

So I assume your out hiking away from any power source. The trouble with solar chargers is that they work when the sun is up which is also usually the time your hiking. When you set camp for the night, the sun is gone and your batteries are dead.
Another option is getting a hand crank generator. They are cheap, reliable, and can be used anytime. There are both the small, USB type good for phones and such, or larger ones that you pedal capable of 120 vac.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all)
     
Aug 14, 2016 10:29 |  #4

Ad for 30000mAh unit, but with 'real' 12000mAh rating...where do these guys get factors for TIME?

Marine suppliers of solar chargers for boats rate their products in mA or A, but leave out the time factor. After all, we might only have full sun and the panels exposed at proper angle to the sun for 5-6 hours per day. If the panel cannot be at right angle to the sun, like at 45 degrees to sun, its efficiency drops to 70%. Unless you put your phone and solar panel on the ground all day, it is not really going to get much suitable exposure even on your back. which is not the same as mounted all day on the top of an RV. And even then think about what fraction of time is with sun overhead at more than 45 degrees...6 hours during summer?!...as I write this, it is 8:35am and the sun is still at avertical angle of less than 45 degrees

Then there is the shading factor, where a panel's full sun rating is much less efficient in less than ideal conditions. A light overcast might drop it from full sun 100% down to 70%, and heavy overcast to 25%.

IF a product claims that it can provide 5V at 1A current, and do so well enough to charge a phone for 6 hours, that is 30000mAh, but it is storing electricity into its own battery in order to make such a claim.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
Post edited over 7 years ago by CameraMan.
     
Aug 14, 2016 11:12 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #5

gjl711 wrote in post #18095182 (external link)
So I assume your out hiking away from any power source. The trouble with solar chargers is that they work when the sun is up which is also usually the time your hiking. When you set camp for the night, the sun is gone and your batteries are dead.
Another option is getting a hand crank generator. They are cheap, reliable, and can be used anytime. There are both the small, USB type good for phones and such, or larger ones that you pedal capable of 120 vac.

The one I was looking at actually has a battery in it. You charge the battery in the device then you use the battery to charge your phone.

Something similar to this...

http://www.ocm.com …bybroduf6r5ibk2​g5sp3c.jpg (external link)

You charge it up, then you can (supposedly) charge your phone 3 - 4 times from a fully charged device.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drmaxx
Goldmember
1,281 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Jul 2010
Post edited over 7 years ago by drmaxx. (3 edits in all)
     
Aug 14, 2016 11:40 |  #6

Solar charging stations are usually rated in W (power). mAh doesn't make a lot of sense. At least that's the way they sell you solar cells over here in Europe. For hiking, you typically buy a 5W or 10W module at a certain voltage (typically 5 V or 12 V).
Just to give you an idea about the energy you need to charge a LP6 battery (7.2 V, 1800 mAh = 12.96 Wh of Energy). You loose about 20% for charging the LP6 directly from the Solar cell -> 12.96*1.2 = 15.5 Wh. With a 5W panel you theoretically need a little more then 3 hours to charge your battery.

BUT: The rating is for standard situation (1000 W solar energy per square meter, vertical on the cell and 25 °C). In reality you never get that. Either it is way less then 1000 W/m2 (Arizona full sun) or then it is way above 25 °C and heat decreases efficiency substantial or then the sun is not vertically above the solar cells. Additionally, the ratings are similar to battery ratings. Very often they are substantially off. Additionally, if you have an other battery pack in between, then you loose an other 20% for charging this battery.

In practice this means, the example above takes 2 - 5 times longer - even if you have your pack exposed to sun - depending on where you are and what quality solar pack you have.

My conclusion was, that for most temporary uses you are better off with a large power bank.


Donate if you love POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Aug 26, 2016 09:14 |  #7

CameraMan wrote in post #18095132 (external link)
So, I've been wondering what mobile photographers do to keep their phones charged up while they're away from any stationary charging locations

My question is how many times will you have to recharge your phone before you're at an outlet again?

Battery backups can be fairly inexpensive and work very well if you get a quality model. I use a Sharkk brand 10,000mAh battery that has two put put jacks (1A and 2.1A). I can get about 4-5 recharging out of it no problem. Like I said, if you do go that way get a QUALITY brand. Stay away from the cheap Chinese eBay crap ones as they will really embellish the mAh ratting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
proimages
Senior Member
Avatar
319 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
     
Aug 26, 2016 10:36 |  #8

charging a phone by solar is doable, couple cool fold out solar panels on the market. Slow and impractical is key word.. Also there is a gas stove that charges usb..that said..I do a lot of motion control work in the field and could never carry enough panels to be effective so a generator is on my list. I use a deep cycle and can charge cameras, laptop phone and a number of 10000mAH before it dies..works out to 80000mAH. I have it setup as a second battery in my car and it wasn't charging properly (lasted a full weekend in the field before dead..) also take into account that an inverter will also suck up a bit of that resource.


Proimages.com (external link) - DarrinNupuf.com (external link) - Nupufnudes.com (external link) - video stock (external link)
_______________
PHOTO - VIDEO - ACTION SPORTS - MOTION CONTROL - TIME LAPSE - BACK COUNTRY - FINE ART

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 26, 2016 11:57 |  #9

I bought one. It charged my phone twice so far (while it was left on), I've charged a speaker and my iPod one time as well. I'm pretty sure the charger caught some sun rays a few times since charging it fully the first time. I'm pretty happy with it at the moment.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,811 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Solar Powered Charger
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1669 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.