Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 17 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 11:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lesson Learned

 
nicshow
Senior Member
Avatar
524 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Central IL, USA
     
Aug 17, 2016 11:06 |  #1

I negotiated a deal with a regional health care company which was opening a new clinic. They wanted to print and frame the images themselves in order to keep a consistent look across their clinics. So I sold them the right to print one time from my digital files.

I just had the chance to see them yesterday and was mortified. Not only were the prints wrinkly in their frame, they had converted them to black and white or some murky sepia tone (at least those I saw in the lobby area - the ones in exam rooms or other rooms may have not been altered.) Luckily, my name is not on them but I'm still just very disappointed. I spent a lot of time getting the colors right in preparation for printing and could have done the conversion myself had I known they wanted them in B&W/Sepia. One of the images is not all that great except for the color and so now it is just a very mediocre print devoid of any color.

I never considered they would apply additional post-processing and should have included that, I suppose, in my contract with them.

Just an experience to share with others who, like me, may never anticipate severe color correction after selling a digital image.

Nic


My Gear

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/nicshow/ (external link)
http://www.nicshowalte​r.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 487
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
     
Aug 17, 2016 12:06 |  #2

Sorry to hear that your client "destroyed" your photos. Would language in your contract have prevented them from doing so. What will you do to prevent this in the future.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bearmann
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Likes: 57
Joined Feb 2008
Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme.
     
Aug 17, 2016 13:51 |  #3

I think you should print out a few of the photos in color and B&W and show them the difference. Offer, for an additional fee, a reprint of all of their photos and perhaps framing too. I'm sure they don't know what they gave up when they printed and framed the photos themselves.


Barry

http://b-r-s-photo.zenfolio.com (external link) (remove the dashes)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JacobPhoto
Goldmember
1,434 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Jun 2005
Location: La Verne, Cali
     
Aug 17, 2016 14:38 |  #4

nicshow wrote in post #18098198 (external link)
I negotiated a deal with a regional health care company which was opening a new clinic. They wanted to print and frame the images themselves in order to keep a consistent look across their clinics. So I sold them the right to print one time from my digital files.

I just had the chance to see them yesterday and was mortified. Not only were the prints wrinkly in their frame, they had converted them to black and white or some murky sepia tone (at least those I saw in the lobby area - the ones in exam rooms or other rooms may have not been altered.) Luckily, my name is not on them but I'm still just very disappointed. I spent a lot of time getting the colors right in preparation for printing and could have done the conversion myself had I known they wanted them in B&W/Sepia. One of the images is not all that great except for the color and so now it is just a very mediocre print devoid of any color.

I never considered they would apply additional post-processing and should have included that, I suppose, in my contract with them.

Just an experience to share with others who, like me, may never anticipate severe color correction after selling a digital image.

Nic

Hopefully, the price they paid you for a digital print makes you forget your sorrows.

I see 2 ways to approach this:
- The first is to require them to purchase the prints through you, so that you can QC the final product. That could lead to them being disappointed with the final product, since it didn't meet their vision.
- The second approach is to know that in selling them the digital file, there is always a possibility that either the client or the print shop will manipulate the file in a way that you didn't anticipate, resulting in a final product that doesn't meet your standard, but apparently does meet the client's standard.

In the end, you got paid to provide them with what they wanted. I'm assuming the client is happy with the final product. If they weren't happy, then they have the print shop or their own processes to blame, as you simply provided them with the file as requested.


~ Canon 7d / 5D ~ Novatron strobe setup + Vagabond
~ Some L glass, some flashes, the usual

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Aug 17, 2016 14:48 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I don't see a problem here as long as the client is happy with what they purchase. Art is a funny thing where there is no right or wrong. I've gone to enough galleries and have been horrified by the neon saturated colours of some of the images...hurt the eyes looking at them yet obviously the photographer thought they were great and I'm sure someone bought them and proudly hang in their living rooms.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8349
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
Post edited over 7 years ago by Tom Reichner. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 18, 2016 01:04 |  #6

nicshow wrote in post #18098198 (external link)
. . .my name is not on them . . .


JacobPhoto wrote in post #18098378 (external link)
In the end, you got paid to provide them with what they wanted.

Hogloff wrote in post #18098382 (external link)
I don't see a problem here as long as the client is happy with what they purchase.

My sentiments exactly. It doesn't really matter what the prints look like. What matters is that you got paid.

My suggestion is that if you're looking for some kind of personal satisfaction, then you can have some prints made the way you like and hang them in your place.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,308 views & 1 like for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Lesson Learned
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
662 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.