24-105mm f/4L IS II:
- Weight 795g
- Total length 118mm
- Maximum diameter of 83.5mm
- Filter Size 77mm
- $1099
16-35mm f/2.8L III:
- Weight 790g
- Total length 127.5mm
- Maximum diameter of 88.5mm
- Filter Size 82mm
- $2199
Aug 20, 2016 13:47 | #1 24-105mm f/4L IS II:
16-35mm f/2.8L III:
5DII + 6D | 16-35/4.0L IS | Σ35/1.4A | 40/2.8 | Σ85/1.4A | 70-200/2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rantercsr Goldmember  More info Post edited over 7 years ago by rantercsr. | Aug 20, 2016 14:44 | #2 Been kinda holding off on current 16-35 f4 version in hopes this one woould have IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 20, 2016 18:41 | #3 that 24-105 can be a real winner for canon with that price tag. It's about as heavy as the 24-70ii though. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 20, 2016 23:47 | #4 Only $1099 for the new 24-105mm? That means the current version's price is gonna go way down. Looks like I'm finally getting an L lens Gear: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=18556308
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Aug 21, 2016 00:07 | #5  Permanent banScottboarding wrote in post #18101412  Only $1099 for the new 24-105mm? That means the current version's price is gonna go way down. Looks like I'm finally getting an L lens  You can do better for less. The 24-105 STM is now on the refurb page.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I want a lens with weather-sealing for my 7D. And I love constant aperture lenses. I love my Sigma 17-50mm, but it's not weather-sealed, and I rarely use the 17mm end of it. I'm going to get a FF body somewhat soon and I don't currently have any normal zoom lenses that would work with it. Gear: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=18556308
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Aug 25, 2016 22:00 | #7 The Sigma 24-105A ruined any desire I had or would have for any 24-105L. Not to mention I was pretty disgusted with the Canon version I tried before the S. And the Sigma is still less expensive. Just saying. My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yeah the Sigma version looks great. I really wish it had weather sealing. I want just one lens with weather sealing and I'll be happy. It seems the only affordable options for weather sealing are the 24-105mm f4 and the 17-40mm f4; neither of which being optically great. Gear: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=18556308
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 28, 2016 19:10 | #9 I bought a used 24-105 lens literally days before this one was announced.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jethr0 Goldmember  More info | Aug 28, 2016 19:27 | #10 Rainyday wrote in post #18109580 I bought a used 24-105 lens literally days before this one was announced.  I picked one up last week. 2014 mfg for a bit less than a third of what the current new copy sells for. www.jefflowe.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1286 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
