Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 21:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!

 
sploo
premature adulation
2,664 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 641
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Sep 15, 2016 05:39 as a reply to  @ post 18128652 |  #2176

Hangerhead wrote in post #18128636 (external link)
I appreciate the detail in the post...but aren't the 2 kit lens variants both f4 IS (so the 24-70 and the 24-105 are both SI f4)

Ah. Sorry! I thought you were talking about the 24-70II - I forgot about the f/4 IS!

AFAIU The 24-70 f/4 IS isn't great around 50mm, but otherwise it's a perfectly good lens (with a useful macro/minimum focus distance). I'd hope (maybe) that the new 24-105 f/4 IS II would be better across the range (but I've not seen any tests).

Mike wrote in post #18128648 (external link)
How is that so cheap??!!

That kit from B&H is $4599, which is £3473, but I suspect there are grey channels through which the gear can be acquired for low costs. £3199 is suspiciously low though.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Sep 15, 2016 06:05 |  #2177

Talley wrote in post #18128472 (external link)
I've been shooting raw only for some stupid reason so I switched to R+J tonight and never would of thought the JPG looked this good.

Seriously I have NEVER seen JPG from a canon look like this. I'm floored.

When I got my 80D, the jpeg quality, and the adjustment options was one of the things I immediately noticed. The default Jpeg picture style is not much different from earlier Canons but now that you can change the sharpness fineness and threshold it gives you much better control over the jpeg quality.
On my 80D my custom picture style is:

- Picture style: Faithful
- Strength: 5
- Fineness: 2
- Threshold: 3
- Contrast: 0
- Saturation: +1
- Color Tone: 0

This gives a nice, detailed image without the sharpening halos. Looks a bit more like my Sony jpegs (both from my A7RII and RX100). Sony's jpegs are so good in my opinion that it takes a good effort to achieve them if you start from RAW :)


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rantercsr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,791 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 9531
Joined Mar 2014
     
Sep 15, 2016 06:39 |  #2178

Talley wrote in post #18128134 (external link)
which allows me to use APS-C glass ;)

Have you tried this ?

Im curious to see how it looks..
Ive already found myself a ff camera that fills in the video needs..
Im sure later sometime ill have the 5d4 to replace my 5d3

Im also wondering why some people are saying 1.64 crop in 4k.. i thought it was 1.74.. i searched and im even seeing something on canon usa web site refer to the crop as 1.74

Probably doesnt sound like much .. but i think that little bit would make for some very noticable vignettes


My portraits IG (external link)
MY flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,664 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 641
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Sep 15, 2016 06:53 |  #2179

rantercsr wrote in post #18128704 (external link)
Have you tried this ?

Im curious to see how it looks..
Ive already found myself a ff camera that fills in the video needs..
Im sure later sometime ill have the 5d4 to replace my 5d3

Im also wondering why some people are saying 1.64 crop in 4k.. i thought it was 1.74.. i searched and im even seeing something on canon usa web site refer to the crop as 1.74

Probably doesnt sound like much .. but i think that little bit would make for some very noticable vignettes

The look should be similar to what you'd get with the lens on a crop body - a lens isn't affected by the sensor that's behind it (i.e. it still projects the same image). I.e. a Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 on the 5D4 in 4K crop would look like a Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 on an APS-C body (albeit with just a bit more cropping).

The confusion over the cropping comes from how you calculate it. The 5D4 horizontal resolution is 6720 pixels. UHD is 3840, but DCI 4K is 4096 (see https://en.wikipedia.o​rg/wiki/4K_resolution (external link))

The 5D4 records 4K in the latter format, which is a 6720/4096=1.64x crop. If you further crop the video down to UHD width then it's 6720/3840=1.75x crop.

However, some people calculate based on the diagonal resolution, so there are further variations.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neilyb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,200 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Munich
     
Sep 15, 2016 07:00 |  #2180

sploo wrote in post #18128679 (external link)
That kit from B&H is $4599, which is £3473, but I suspect there are grey channels through which the gear can be acquired for low costs. £3199 is suspiciously low though.

There exists a deal between Hong Kong and UK which allows imports with no taxation, once the gear is in the UK it can then also be sold in the EU, again without taxation (but not if it is imported into the EU from HK...). Of course that will end with Brexit. But these cameras and lenses will not be supported by Canon in UK or EU.


http://natureimmortal.​blogspot.com (external link)

http://www.natureimmor​tal.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:19 |  #2181

Neilyb wrote in post #18128730 (external link)
these cameras and lenses will not be supported by Canon in UK or EU.

And that right there is why I'll stick to paying a little bit more!


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,664 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 641
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:22 |  #2182

Neilyb wrote in post #18128730 (external link)
There exists a deal between Hong Kong and UK which allows imports with no taxation, once the gear is in the UK it can then also be sold in the EU, again without taxation (but not if it is imported into the EU from HK...). Of course that will end with Brexit. But these cameras and lenses will not be supported by Canon in UK or EU.

I didn't know that. I got my 5D3 from HDEW Cameras in the UK (a grey import) but I've never had any problem with it being CPS registered or serviced (IRC it's even registered with Canon as being purchased from HDEW), so I assume it didn't come in via that route.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:30 |  #2183

Neilyb wrote in post #18128624 (external link)
After looking through the DPR samples one thing is sure, the 5Ds and 5DsR are monsters for pure detail, they destroy the 5D4. Which raises doubts as to which body I really should buy. Granted the 4K, crop for me is actually useful as a wildlife shooter, looks great and with the whole dual-pixel gig actually usable for everyday stuff. The DR of the 5D4 is looking very nice, even if it still trails the other two major bodies with Sony sensors.

But as a primarily landscape body the 5DsR looks like the one to buy. Not only cheaper, especially now prices are starting to drop and used models are available, but that detail. The DR is not actually all that bad, and when it is firmly planted on a tripod it hardly matters. Wifi, GPS and NFC are minor things which might be useful twice a year.

There really should have been a 5D4 R to make the best of that sensor.

Oh boy. Choices, choices.

Now you make me wondering! But I think that I may still go for 5D4 as better AF & DR are more important for me :-)


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
planet5D
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:33 |  #2184

amoergosum wrote in post #18128618 (external link)
I'm shooting stills & video so I am disappointed by the video specs (heavy 4K Crop, no 120fps 1080p, old Motion-JPEG codec etc.).
I'm actually thinking about continuing to use my 5DIII for stills and purchasing the Panasonic GH5 for video (hopefully it gets released soon).


Let's see about the specs.
Here are some rumors:

- no crop for 4K (the Mark IV records 4k with a 1.74 crop factor which is a higher crop factor than Panasonic’s micro four thirds mount with a speedbooster attached)
- 4:2:2 10 bits internal recording
- 1080p 120fps
- 5 axis image stabilization

So... your big deal is that the 5D4 has a 'heavy' crop for 4k video yet you're wanting to compare a RUMORED MFT camera with a 16mp sensor (2.3 crop factor) and the addition of a speedbooster (which 'enhances' the crop down to about 1.7-1.8) to a full frame 30mp sensor with a crop factor for 4k of 1.74

And the "old" MJPEG works really well and many say it has better results than heavily compressed H.264 video.

The problem for me is the Panasonic GH4 looks like "Video" where the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV looks much more like cinema (opinion of course)... and I'd much rather have the 4k out of the 5D4.

Sounds like you’re a vide guy - so buy a video camera.

BTW I would love to see Canon add 5-axis to their cams.


Light L16: http://lightRumors.co
the premier community for Light L16 owners

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sourcehill
Senior Member
Avatar
483 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 80
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Boston
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:34 |  #2185

So I've been shooting with the 5d4 for a couple days and here are my thoughts...

AF is super snappy and it seems to drive the lenses harder than my 5d3.

Love the shutter sound and feel. Much more inline with the 5dsR.

Why in the holy F did they not have the selected AF point light up? I'm sure a million event shooters have been asking for this. Isn't this Canon's 'event' camera?

Why can't I set certain buttons to just meter? They give me the option to have the shutter button only meter but I want that to also single-shot AF. I don't want to drive the lens every time I meter. I have BBF set up for servo. I've assigned the * button to 'AF-OFF' so basically pressing it just wakes the camera up and meters. 'AF-OFF' doesn't really have a purpose unless I'm using one of their huge telephotos, correct? Does anyone know a better way to have a button purely meter?

Lastly, outer points seem to be just fine.


I like gear and I have too much.
Check out my current work on Instagram @immichaelcarmen
redwoodandrye.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (8 edits in all)
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:55 |  #2186

sourcehill wrote in post #18128825 (external link)
So I've been shooting with the 5d4 for a couple days and here are my thoughts...

AF is super snappy and it seems to drive the lenses harder than my 5d3.

Love the shutter sound and feel. Much more inline with the 5dsR.

Why in the holy F did they not have the selected AF point light up? I'm sure a million event shooters have been asking for this. Isn't this Canon's 'event' camera?

Because it is a non-trivial set of hardware/firmware changes to light up just the one AF point. Imagine an LCD screen where you have lots of LCD boxes that appear or disappear. You have one red LED above that LCD screen. It lights up the entire screen, not just the one AF box that might have its matrix activated. For the 1DX2, they had to go back to introducing individual LEDs for each AF point.

https://learn.usa.cano​n.com …red_af_illumina​tion.htmlp (external link)

The 1D series is the pro events camera. The 5D is more a prosumer model, like the 7D.

For metering, I divorce the AF completely off the shutter button. I simply don't want it to focus when I hit the shutter. I half-press the shutter to re-meter though. I have AF set up on the back buttons, I use AF-on, now that there is a dedicated button for it as of the 7D. Basically I want a dedicated button to meter, one to AF, one to lock exposure, etc.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Avatar
2,713 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 724
Joined Jul 2007
     
Sep 15, 2016 08:57 |  #2187

sourcehill wrote in post #18128825 (external link)
Why in the holy F did they not have the selected AF point light up? I'm sure a million event shooters have been asking for this. Isn't this Canon's 'event' camera?

Uhoh, maybe I'm confused on how they supposedly improved the light-up viewfinder. I thought this was enhanced over the 5D3 :(


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.com (external link)
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SereneSpeed
Goldmember
1,081 posts
Likes: 2535
Joined Jan 2013
     
Sep 15, 2016 09:01 |  #2188

With the changes to the UI as a result of the touch screen, did Canon leave us with a way to review the last image at 100%, at the AF point, with a single touch like you could on the 5D3?


https://www.danbcreati​ve.com (external link) - Commercial Work
http://unabashedbeauty​.com (external link) - Boudoir/NSFW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 15, 2016 09:03 |  #2189

Colorblinded wrote in post #18128855 (external link)
Uhoh, maybe I'm confused on how they supposedly improved the light-up viewfinder. I thought this was enhanced over the 5D3 :(

The 1DX2 completely re-engineered the AF indicators vs the rest of the LCD focus display. I think the thought was that this was somehow going to trickle back down to the lesser models.

https://learn.usa.cano​n.com …red_af_illumina​tion.htmlp (external link)

I suspect this will remain a 1D series differentiator, due to the complicated and more costly solution it has to combat the issue.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Sep 15, 2016 09:04 as a reply to  @ SereneSpeed's post |  #2190

What if you hit the magnify button, does it still do what it did before, presuming you configure zoom to start at the AF point at some predetermined zoom level?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,097,994 views & 2,648 likes for this thread, 271 members have posted to it and it is followed by 181 members.
Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1119 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.