Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 21:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!

 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Sep 16, 2016 09:58 |  #2326

gjl711 wrote in post #18129938 (external link)
Isn't that almost 2 years old? I guess it would be new for Nikon but the sensor has been in market for some time.


No Idea of a newer exmor, but I also don't recall which came first, A7r or D800 ?


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,716 posts
Likes: 4035
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 16, 2016 09:58 |  #2327

eric1 wrote in post #18129945 (external link)
I thought it was in they're latest cam? Maybe been out for 6months? Is that right?

Just looked it up. I guess it was announced June 10, 2015, so 15 months.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
planet5D
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 16, 2016 09:59 |  #2328

Talley wrote in post #18129933 (external link)
Video will be recorded to the card you have set to be the playback card.

Good golly mate! You teach me something new every day! And you'd think i'd know this already but since I rarely use SD cards it was never an issue for me (until now when I start buying SD because they're so much cheaper!) - I tend to lose SD cards since they're so small LOL


Light L16: http://lightRumors.co
the premier community for Light L16 owners

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eric1
Senior Member
Avatar
729 posts
Likes: 32
Joined May 2003
Location: St. Louis, Mo.
Post edited over 7 years ago by eric1.
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:00 |  #2329

gjl711 wrote in post #18129949 (external link)
Just looked it up. I guess it was announced June 10, 2015, so 15 months.

Yeah, I looked hard at the 810, before I bought the 5D4.


Eric
www.pbase.com/ericm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tinshield2016
Member
86 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 118
Joined May 2016
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:01 as a reply to  @ post 18129917 |  #2330

Thank you so much for the video some aw some information there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,716 posts
Likes: 4035
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:03 |  #2331

eric1 wrote in post #18129954 (external link)
Yeah, I looked hard at the 810, before I bout the 5D4.

I shoot an 800 at work and would have switched if I wasn't so heavily invested in Canon glass. I'm at a point where my 5DII needs a refresh so the MkIV looks pretty promising. Not in a hurry so might wait for the 6D refresh.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
planet5D
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:05 |  #2332

tinshield2016 wrote in post #18129955 (external link)
Thank you so much for the video some aw some information there.

Which video? Did I miss one I need to see?


Light L16: http://lightRumors.co
the premier community for Light L16 owners

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tinshield2016
Member
86 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 118
Joined May 2016
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:10 as a reply to  @ planet5D's post |  #2333

The one you posted about assigning the back buttons on focusing, you did give Tally all the credit it was aw some.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:13 |  #2334

welshwizard1971 wrote in post #18129264 (external link)
Is anyone else slightly unsettled by the reviews that are raving about how it's a great DSLR, nearly as good as the D810, which is being replaced any week now, are we about to be left behind again??

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18129914 (external link)
The reviews I am reading might be saying that the sensor is "nearly as good as D810", but they are not saying that about the camera which has a few steps ahead of the D810. These are not the same thing.

If the sensor is better than my 5DII or 7D then I'll be perfectly happy. Who cares that there's possibly something a little bit better somewhere else or just over the horizon? If it bothers you then don't buy this, quite simple! The fact is that for most (or me at least) this represents a significant upgrade from what they have. There's probably never going to be the perfect camera.

I'm also thinking that I might trade in the 7D and keep the 5DII to go with the 5DIV...for weddings (my main realm of photography) I use the 5DII about 90% and have never been entirely happy with the look of the 7D. Sure I'll lose a littel reach but then I could also get the 100-400 for sports and such like...


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:15 |  #2335

umphotography wrote in post #18129898 (external link)
I disagree

People need t grow some kahones. I just climbed Mt Whitney with a 1Dx2, a 70-200 and a 17-35.....These camera are not heavy. My steal toes work boots weigh about the same

even without gear, I probably wouldnt even be able to climb that :-P

maybe I need some growth hormones :twisted:


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eric1
Senior Member
Avatar
729 posts
Likes: 32
Joined May 2003
Location: St. Louis, Mo.
     
Sep 16, 2016 10:35 |  #2336

Mike wrote in post #18129966 (external link)
If the sensor is better than my 5DII or 7D then I'll be perfectly happy. Who cares that there's possibly something a little bit better somewhere else or just over the horizon? If it bothers you then don't buy this, quite simple! The fact is that for most (or me at least) this represents a significant upgrade from what they have. There's probably never going to be the perfect camera.

I'm also thinking that I might trade in the 7D and keep the 5DII to go with the 5DIV...for weddings (my main realm of photography) I use the 5DII about 90% and have never been entirely happy with the look of the 7D. Sure I'll lose a littel reach but then I could also get the 100-400 for sports and such like...

Nothing wrong with a 5D2, but the AF alone is worth an upgrade to the 5D4. The files look much better in the new cam too. I've only had it a week, but I'm happy I upgraded from the 5D3.


Eric
www.pbase.com/ericm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Sep 16, 2016 11:05 as a reply to  @ eric1's post |  #2337

Yeah, my GF tried to take some photos in dim light last weekend with the 5D2 - it hunted for a while and she gave up! Better AF would be a good help!


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PJJ205
Senior Member
348 posts
Likes: 446
Joined Aug 2015
     
Sep 16, 2016 11:06 as a reply to  @ eric1's post |  #2338

According to the keyboard Warriors who have never even seen a 5DIV in person, there are very minimal changes and its not even worth upgrading to. Additionally, the camera is "crippled" and a "minimalist" paperweight. By the way, I sold my 5DIII on and picked up my 5DIV earlier this week. I am very pleased with my new piece of trash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
planet5D
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 16, 2016 11:12 as a reply to  @ PJJ205's post |  #2339

^^ yea i'm very happy to have sold my 5D3 and gotten the IV

And I see many people who were bashing the camera after the announcement who actually try it and are saying "i know I complained when I saw the specs, but after using it, I love it" etc.


Light L16: http://lightRumors.co
the premier community for Light L16 owners

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Sep 16, 2016 11:26 |  #2340

umphotography wrote in post #18129898 (external link)
I disagree

People need t grow some kahones. I just climbed Mt Whitney with a 1Dx2, a 70-200 and a 17-35.....These camera are not heavy. My steal toes work boots weigh about the same

Hah! I work multi-day music festivals carrying the holy trinity of f/2.8 zooms, a couple of primes, two bodies and sometimes a flash. And I'm in my mid-50s. My only wish is that the beer be cold when I get to put my pack down. Sure, less weight would be nice but I'm not about to compromise, and at least for now I'm proud of the equipment that makes up that weight.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,097,992 views & 2,648 likes for this thread, 271 members have posted to it and it is followed by 181 members.
Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1088 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.