Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 21:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!

 
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 25, 2016 00:49 |  #3076

Talley wrote in post #18139400 (external link)
So weird for me to say this....

I'm really really really really liking the live view focusing performance and small histogram feature. The face detection is great. I may end up turning Sony if sony performs like this

welcome to two years ago, sony goes and does one further, nevermind the face detection, sony can do that with any canon lens, but with native lens, it'll focus on the eyeball.

You can also register faces so in a crowd, the face detection picks out your kids first.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Zip
My neighbours are looking at me a bit strangely
Avatar
1,394 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 1982
Joined Aug 2015
     
Sep 25, 2016 00:59 |  #3077

Charlie wrote in post #18139526 (external link)
welcome to two years ago, sony goes and does one further, nevermind the face detection, sony can do that with any canon lens, but with native lens, it'll focus on the eyeball.

You can also register faces so in a crowd, the face detection picks out your kids first.

I have made a horrible error getting the Canon.

Your images have convinced me I should have got a Sony.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
1,627 posts
Gallery: 360 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 985
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
Post edited over 7 years ago by STIC.
     
Sep 25, 2016 02:47 |  #3078
bannedPermanent ban

Even I, feet planted firmly in the 20th century, can see that those Sony's are putting out some NICE images...


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
1,627 posts
Gallery: 360 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 985
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
     
Sep 25, 2016 02:48 |  #3079
bannedPermanent ban

Talley wrote in post #18139488 (external link)
^^^ /facepalm

Aha...

That moment when you realise I was right... :p


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
manderson
Member
202 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Abingdon, MD USA
     
Sep 25, 2016 03:51 |  #3080

mike_d wrote in post #18139440 (external link)
Wow that sounds incredibly inefficient.

I am certain there are Lightroom features I should learn which may be helpful, but I haven't taken the time. I am not a professional photographer, I do not have thousands upon thousands of photographs, and I am just now starting to dabble in multiple frames per second with my friend's model rocket club. I do not batch process as I view each photograph as individual and deserving of singular attention to processing.

Zoombrowser imports and organizes photos directly into the Pictures folder by year and date, and this is fine for me. I can easily scan through and eliminate undesirable photographs so items I import into Lightroom are only those I intend to work with. Is there a way for Lightroom to automatically open a specific folder when you select Import? I don't think so. Navigating folders in Lightroom for import is a pain. Of course, there may be a better way I am not aware of. My computer is set up with SSD for OS and apps only in order to optimize overhead. All user data is mapped to RAID 1 TB hard drives. Zoombrowser is intuitive enough to import directly into the "Pictures" folder which has been remapped to one of the RAID data drives. I see nothing very intuitive about Lightroom, but I am really not attempting to bash it. There are books, and Lynda.com has some training videos I have intended to watch for some time. I am certain there are redeeming features I will find useful.

I have worked in IT for over thirty years and have spent a great deal of time organizing server data for hundreds of users. I only wish I could help some of the people still using XP crossover to Windows 10. It is a very competent and much improved OS, you just need to learn how to turn things off. The first thing you should do is go into the GPO and turn off the stupid Cortana, then secure it by turning off all social media functions, and finally optimize performance. Most of our friends who are still using XP would be very comfortable with my computer.

However, we have digressed from discussing the 5D Mark IV. I just pre-ordered mine from B&H Photo. :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Sep 25, 2016 04:05 |  #3081

Just going to pop over to the Computer Forum and see if there are any posts about the 5D4  :p


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
Goldmember
Avatar
1,987 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22409
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
     
Sep 25, 2016 04:28 |  #3082

Note to self....next time you want to run RAWs from a new camera through Lightroom you must install the new version of Lightroom...... Just downloading the new version is not enough..... D'oh!!!!!


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
22,933 posts
Gallery: 457 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 15502
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU
     
Sep 25, 2016 04:58 |  #3083

manderson wrote in post #18139592 (external link)
Zoombrowser imports and organizes photos directly into the Pictures folder by year and date, and this is fine for me. I can easily scan through and eliminate undesirable photographs so items I import into Lightroom are only those I intend to work with.

On my Mac it was always called ImageBrowser. I still use it to download my images from the camera. It's great for the first selection round and is capable of showing where the focus point was when taking the shot. However, ImageBrowser is no match for Lightroom when it comes to organising images. And Lightroom's search tools are simply superb and the reason I switched from Bridge to LR. With LR any search is instantaneous. I can select all my images, enter any search perimeter and it will find the images immediately, without any delay. Whether I search on a specific lens, a specific camera, focal length, exposure settings, keywords, labels, ratings (and combinations of these), you name it, LR finds them instantaneously. It's completely brilliant.


Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,098 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland
Post edited over 7 years ago by John_T.
     
Sep 25, 2016 05:09 |  #3084

...and the LR Metadata Library Filter as a tool for what you have done with what when and how is simply invaluable for so many uses and insight...


Canon : EOS R : 5DIV : 5DS R : 5DIII : 7DII : 40 2.8 : 50 1.4 : 35L : 85L : 100L IS Macro : 135L : 16-35L II : RF-24-105L IS : 70-200L II : 100-400L IS II : 1.4x & 2x TC III : 600EX-RT : 580EX : 430EX : G1XII : Markins Q10 & Q3T : Jobu Gimbal : Manfrotto Underware : etc...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luxx
Senior Member
478 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2013
Location: St Louis
     
Sep 25, 2016 05:45 |  #3085

Im still looking for opinions on low light , high ISO noise. I've heard one vote for 1/2 a stop better (talley) than 5d3. Anyone else? Please don't direct me to comparison sites. I'm looking for the opinions of folks actually using the camera.

I'm getting the feeling that the 5d4 increased low ISO DR and has crazy good af but maybe didn't improve high ISO noise all that much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
Goldmember
Avatar
1,987 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22409
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
Post edited over 7 years ago by graham121.
     
Sep 25, 2016 06:25 |  #3086

So became a fully paid up card carrying member of the club today, and no turning back either as the 6D and 1D4 have already sold too.

first thing was to go through the menus and customise it as close to my 7D2 as possible...very easy just relaying what was on the 7D2 across to the 5D4. ( oh and to stop the 7D2 from getting jealous it was fitted out with a brand new grip today too ).

Most noticeable first impression ..... How good is it having 61 AF points on the 100-400 mm II with the 1.4 III ? Even though the light was m'eh it was crisp and precise with all the points I used.

And here is something that dawned on me when I was going through the images afterwards. Being able to compose and focus using any of the available AF points can allow filling the frame with more of the target.....rather than having to just us the centre point.

And that means more pixels on target. And with even more to play with to start with I think I am going to enjoy this combo for birding and airshows.


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Sep 25, 2016 06:25 |  #3087

Has anyone on here bought a 5D4 grey import?
Due to the price for this camera in the UK a grey import seems a very tempting offer...I havent noticed and problems on the forum that would indicate a serious hardware problem, so most issues that may arise should be able to be sorted with a firmware update which shouldnt be an issue...
I realise that you wont get a proper Canon warranty with a grey import but the suppliers I have been looking at all offer a 3 year warranty, with the first year of that being done at a Canon service centre...
Is there any reason not to take a chance ? I have owned Canon cameras and lenses since the early 80s and have never yet had to send any equipment in for repair...
Peoples thoughts on this would be interesting...


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
Post edited over 7 years ago by Mike.
     
Sep 25, 2016 06:58 |  #3088

How do I get the "Format Card" option into my custom menu? I can't seem to find it to add it.

Also, is there a way of making the AE lock button and the AF Select button act as zoom in and out buttons (like my other bodies) or am I stuck with touchscreen zooming?

I have a gallery of photos with various lenses from yesterday with some tricky exposure (shooting towards the setting sun) if anyone wants a look, plus low and high ISO ranges here: https://www.flickr.com​/photos/mikegphotograp​hy/albums/721576731372​15252/with/29913969905​/


Here's one example of shadow recovery from me:

SOOC:

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8310/29619575600_6fa4abc018_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/M8o4​TW  (external link) Whitstable-0013 (external link) by Michael Green (external link), on Flickr


After LR:

IMAGE: https://c7.staticflickr.com/9/8210/29879005526_7cbee7fd69_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MwiH​nG  (external link) Whitstable-0012 (external link) by Michael Green (external link), on Flickr

www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,664 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 641
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Sep 25, 2016 07:21 as a reply to  @ Mike's post |  #3089

gabebalazs wrote in post #18139409 (external link)
You do have a point regarding software. I really hate "change for change's sake", and Microsoft excels at doing that, or at least so it seems. There are a bunch of things in Win10 that are different from Win7 but many are a backwards step. Take folder view for example. In Win7 (and XP?) I was able to see photo data/info at the bottom of the folder, it was resize-able and was a tremendous help when handling files and quick-checking files. AND, if I desired, I could turn on a preview pane/window on the right within the folder to see the photos larger in a preview. Now, MS just had to screw it up. No info/data at the bottom of the folder any more. Not even optional any more. You have the option of "details pane" OR "preview pane" on the right (or neither). It cannot be moved to the bottom. I searched initially whether I could move it to the bottom. Nope, not possible. Nevertheless, I also found thousands of others who were ticked off since this has totally screwed up their workflow (including mine).
And that's just one thing. Obviously, there are many cool and useful things about Win10, but why change stuff that worked great before???

Yea - the lack of photo info on the bottom bar really bugs me in Windows 10. It's like taking away the zoom in/out functionality from the two top right buttons (on the 5D3 vs the 7D). The bar (or buttons) don't appear to be being used for anything else in the relevant mode, so why remove something that was useful and add nothing in return.

STIC wrote in post #18139474 (external link)
Again, I don't even let ANY program organise anything for me.

I have separate remote hard drives that I download my photo folders to, named by date taken...that's all the organisation I need to find anything I want, instantly.

I use Photoshop CS3 (simply because I have the entire CS3 Design suite), why upgrade...what does photoshop NOT do for me?

And, that goes the same for XP!

Note: I do exactly the same (download photos from the cards to named/dated folders). I then add those folders to my Lightroom catalog (nothing moves on disk unless I specifically tell it to). The benefits are that you can then add keywords to photos to help find something later, plus it pulls the metadata from the EXIF section in the images. Ultimately that makes it easy to then, for example, find all the photos of a dog taken on a 7D in 2012 with a 70-200 at f/5.6 that I'd rated at least 4 out of 5 stars. Note that I don't think I have any dog photos from 2012 with a 70-200, but you get the idea ;-)a

It might be worth picking up one of Scott Kelby's recent Lightroom books; until I read one I didn't realise just how powerful (and useful) LR is. I do probably >95% of my edits in LR now, and only rarely need to dip into Photoshop.

As for what Photoshop doesn't do for you: the issue is not knowing what you don't know. Later versions of Photoshop (I'm talking up to CS6, which is what I run) added some useful features - for example, I've found Content Aware Fill to occasionally be a hugely useful feature (that saves a lot of time). I'm aware later CC versions have a lot more stuff I'd probably find useful, but I don't really want to rent my software, and again, I don't know what I don't know (though if I looked I'd probably be too tempted).

My $0.02 on Windows: XP was good, but the 64-bit version of Windows 7 probably was the pinnacle, and is well worth an upgrade. Windows 8 was a mild abomination, and Windows 10, whilst improved, has retained some of the schizophrenic mismash of features added in 8.

don1163 wrote in post #18139644 (external link)
Has anyone on here bought a 5D4 grey import?
Due to the price for this camera in the UK a grey import seems a very tempting offer...I havent noticed and problems on the forum that would indicate a serious hardware problem, so most issues that may arise should be able to be sorted with a firmware update which shouldnt be an issue...
I realise that you wont get a proper Canon warranty with a grey import but the suppliers I have been looking at all offer a 3 year warranty, with the first year of that being done at a Canon service centre...
Is there any reason not to take a chance ? I have owned Canon cameras and lenses since the early 80s and have never yet had to send any equipment in for repair...
Peoples thoughts on this would be interesting...

Whilst I didn't test the warranty, I've had no problems getting CPS service (and obviously registering with CPS) for a 5D3 and TCs that came from HDEW cameras.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Sep 25, 2016 07:34 |  #3090

eleazar123 wrote in post #18139451 (external link)
Hey everyone, so I picked up a Mark IV today (yay!), But I have this weird issue going on. I'm sure I'll wake up in the morning and everyone will be laughing at my noobish question, but I'm pretty stumped.

See below for 2 sample pictures. I get that set of dark rings on 95% of my pictures. It's also there in live view. But then other times it's nowhere to be found (ie hasty sunset picture attached). If it's something super simple, everyone have a free laugh on me :) The only lens I've tried so far is my Sigma 35m art.
Hosted photo: posted by eleazar123 in
./showthread.php?p=181​39451&i=i116888909
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by eleazar123 in
./showthread.php?p=181​39451&i=i166007025
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Posted about this about a week ago with pictures. Turn off peripheral correction and it's gone.


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,097,529 views & 2,648 likes for this thread, 271 members have posted to it and it is followed by 181 members.
Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1435 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.