Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 21:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!

 
sipowicz
Member
198 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Finland
     
Oct 22, 2016 00:18 |  #4021

Has anybody noticed inconsistent focusing / sharpness when shooting using the timer?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quack ­ Me ­ Up
Senior Member
262 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Rogers, MN
     
Oct 22, 2016 10:16 |  #4022

I plan on buying the 5d to go along with my 7dii. I was wondering if anyone here has used the 600 f4 IS ver I along with the 1.4 extender ver iii on the 5d? Just want to know if the focusing seems to be noticeably slower etc when using the extender? I will be using it mainly for birds. I wouldn't think it would be noticeably different than an 800 5.6 or at least that's what I'm hoping.
Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randy98mtu
Goldmember
Avatar
3,952 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 2045
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Oct 22, 2016 12:14 |  #4023

Hmmm. The wife might be caving. Trying to downplay it. It's like getting a fish on the line. Don't want to scare it off.


Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
Donate for Forum Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,669 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 646
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Oct 22, 2016 13:05 |  #4024

sipowicz wrote in post #18163547 (external link)
Has anybody noticed inconsistent focusing / sharpness when shooting using the timer?

I haven't - but I am finding liveview AF surprisingly flaky. It will refuse to even attempt to focus if my 100L macro is way out of focus, and in moderately low light conditions I've found you really need to find an edge for it to lock on (whereas the viewfinder is fine on the same target).

I was shooting using a 2s timer today (no apparent problems), but are you seeing odd issues with a longer timer (or do you mean the interval timer)?


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
Post edited over 7 years ago by FEChariot. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 22, 2016 13:22 |  #4025

randy98mtu wrote in post #18163868 (external link)
Hmmm. The wife might be caving. Trying to downplay it. It's like getting a fish on the line. Don't want to scare it off.

The strategy that I have been using is to start plugging the next model up from what you really want. If you want a 5d4, start talking about the 1dx2 for a month. If you want the 100-400 II, start talking about the 200-400. Then about a week before the purchase, tell her you feel you don't really need the higher priced one and say you want the cheaper one. She thinks you are then 'saving' money. If you really want a 1dx2 or 200-400, you might need to start talking about cars...


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,669 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 646
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Oct 22, 2016 13:24 |  #4026

FEChariot wrote in post #18163909 (external link)
The strategy that has been to start plugging the next model up from what you really want. If you want a 5d4, start talking about the 1dx2 for a month. If you want the 100-400 II, start talking about the 200-400. Then about a week before the purchase, tell her you fell you don't really need the higher priced one and say you want the cheaper one and you really don't need the more expensive one. If you really want a 1dx2 or 200-400, you might need to start talking about cars...

...or cinema lenses ;-)a


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Oct 22, 2016 14:15 |  #4027

sploo wrote in post #18163912 (external link)
...or cinema lenses ;-)a

Or girlfriends...


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randy98mtu
Goldmember
Avatar
3,952 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 2045
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Oct 22, 2016 14:17 |  #4028

Yahtzee! Depth of field shot taken with the 7 Plus.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/10/4/LQ_820616.jpg
Image hosted by forum (820616) © randy98mtu [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
Donate for Forum Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,669 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 646
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Oct 22, 2016 14:33 |  #4029

Talley wrote in post #18163949 (external link)
Or girlfriends...

It's very expensive to upgrade those though, and there's no service centre where you can send them for fault fixing.

They also have a tendency to hit you if they read posts like this.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Oct 22, 2016 14:35 |  #4030

sploo wrote in post #18163959 (external link)
It's very expensive to upgrade those though, and there's no service centre where you can send them for fault fixing.

They also have a tendency to hit you if they read posts like this.

Or worse when your married and they read posts like that lol


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,669 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 646
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Oct 22, 2016 14:36 |  #4031

Talley wrote in post #18163961 (external link)
Or worse when your married and they read posts like that lol

Fortunately my boss isn't looking over my shoulder at the moment; hence the reason I felt I could get away with it ;-)a


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sipowicz
Member
198 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Finland
     
Oct 22, 2016 19:13 as a reply to  @ sploo's post |  #4032

I was on a tripod shooting a still object. I got sharper photos by pressing the shutter button on normal one shot mode than using the 2s timer. Shooting on manual mode so the settings were pretty much the same. I found that strange but I did not do extensive testing to see what was going on.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Oct 23, 2016 09:25 |  #4033

Went out today with my new body and 500f4...I took 330 shots of some deer that were about 20-25 meters from me, got home and checked the images in Lightroom and only had about 10 images that were sharp !!!
Exactly the same problem as the body that I returned thinking that it was faulty...
The shots that were sharp do not have the detail that I used to get with this lens and my 6D...Images used to be rich and full of detail...with the 5D4 the images seem to lack the same amount of detail and look a bit flat... Could my lens be the problem?? I would not have thought so as it performed perfectly on the 6D...
The weather here in the UK is pretty poor at the moment so it is hard to go out and test in ideal light but I am going to give my 70-200II a good testing on the camera and see what that lens performs like...I dont have another body so Im not able to test my 500 on another camera..
I truely wish I had not sold my 6D to "upgrade" to the 5D4....it is feeling like the most expensive mistake I have ever made..


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Oct 23, 2016 11:44 |  #4034

don1163 wrote in post #18164467 (external link)
Went out today with my new body and 500f4...I took 330 shots of some deer that were about 20-25 meters from me, got home and checked the images in Lightroom and only had about 10 images that were sharp !!!
Exactly the same problem as the body that I returned thinking that it was faulty...
The shots that were sharp do not have the detail that I used to get with this lens and my 6D...Images used to be rich and full of detail...with the 5D4 the images seem to lack the same amount of detail and look a bit flat... Could my lens be the problem?? I would not have thought so as it performed perfectly on the 6D...
The weather here in the UK is pretty poor at the moment so it is hard to go out and test in ideal light but I am going to give my 70-200II a good testing on the camera and see what that lens performs like...I dont have another body so Im not able to test my 500 on another camera..
I truely wish I had not sold my 6D to "upgrade" to the 5D4....it is feeling like the most expensive mistake I have ever made..

Don't be frustrated. I've seen your issues/struggles. I have a question though... why go out and shoot 300 shots and then wait to come back to lightroom to check focus? Do you (when getting an new camera) not chimp and zoom into 100% and really put every lens through it's paces before you go out and shoot? I do. I typically take ~ 100-150 photos around the house, outside, indoor, outdoor, various lighting etc with every single lens to get a feel for how it acts. Sometimes lenses will front focus in fluorescent lighting and back focus in daylight... or focus differently on different bodies OR at different focus distances as well. Right know I know how every single one of my lenses acts. it took me a bit more time with the 200L and 1.4xIII combo but I've slowly dialed it in.

One thing to consider is my 200L F2... on my 5D3 it took a +1 mfa... on my 5D4 it took a +13. throw on the 1.4xIII and it's now at a +11 to a +12 which I'm slowly trying to figure out exactly which one works better.... again I've seen with the TC it focuses different near infinity than it does near MFD. A range of around +9 to +12 is where it's operating most at... I have to dial in the proper MFA for the distance I will be using it most at unless I send off to Canon for correcting (both lens, tc and body).... but if I do that then every third party lens will then need readjusting.

The LCD on the 5D4 is very very good. Exactly what I see with focus errors in the LCD I see on my monitor in lightroom. There shouldn't be any reason not to chimp to dial in a lens.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Oct 23, 2016 12:11 as a reply to  @ Talley's post |  #4035

I didnt just go out and shoot 300+ shoots before checking focus in Lightroom......I spent most of the previous day shooting various things around the woods and field where I live and setting up a target at home in order for it to be right when I went out today...
I was shooting and chimping and adjusting mfa while I was shooting the deer today.....I does not seen to matter what it is set at I just do not get good results...
I went out after posting earlier and shot with my 70-200 and got much better results so I suspect it is some sort of issue between my 500 and the 5D4....Maybe the lens could benefit from a service or being sent in to Canon to be set up with the body..


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,107,787 views & 2,648 likes for this thread, 271 members have posted to it and it is followed by 181 members.
Canon 5D Mark IV -- Time to Discuss!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1109 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.