Loving back my primes 50 1.4A & 85 1.2L (background blur vs 70-200 II @ 200mm)

Mostly I do fashionshoots on a nice location, so for most shots I don't like to blur out the background completely at f1.4 or f1.2.
Last week I did again a shoot with 24-70 2.8L & 70-200 2.8L II, and I can blur out the background also at 200mm f2.8 for closeups.

I didn't want the hassle to switch too many lenses as I like to concentrate on the shoot too.
I think i'm losing my love for the best primes ever, help

Would you shoot with a 24-70 & 70-200 and even take some time to take some relaxed pics with a Sigma 50 1.4Art (halfbody/fashion) and/or a Canon 85 1.2L (portrait) on top of them ?
Switching 3-4 lenses seems a bit much... maybe I forgot the special wow effect of the primes, I don't know

I used the 24-70 for the 24mm (to have some shots of the model with a big abandoned train next to her) and the 70-200 for the close-ups at 200 2.8

I'd say that if you're shooting fashion on seamless and outdoors and never going past 2.8, keep the zooms. If you find yourself needing f2, f1.4, go with the primes. I will generally grab my 24-70 and 70-200 for seamless shoots because I'm usually living around f5.6.

A second body perhaps.