Does this type of thing work or is it old hat?
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Aug 31, 2016 15:39 | #1 Does this type of thing work or is it old hat? Image hosted by forum (810877) © MRphotoIRE [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. "There are no rules for good Photographs, there are only good photographs" Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
98kellrs Senior Member More info | Aug 31, 2016 16:55 | #2 Personally, selective colouring is very old-hat. In this specific case the stained glass windows are over-exposed too, so you're drawing the viewer's eye away from the subject (the couple getting married) and directing the viewer's attention at a weak part of the capture. Ryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 31, 2016 17:05 | #3 Are you aware of the fact that this only makes people look at windows first and totally overlook bride and groom? Website (online) : www.lukaskrasa.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elrey2375 Thinks it's irresponsible More info Post edited over 7 years ago by elrey2375. | Aug 31, 2016 17:12 | #4 I'm going to agree with the previous posters as well. Just doesn't work for me. Always try and expose for the brightest. Much easier to bring up the shadows than it is to retrieve any detail in something that's blown out. Nice shot otherwise, very dramatic and the dress and the couple need to be the focus. http://emjfotografi.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 31, 2016 17:12 | #5 It does draw the eyes away from the bride. Thanks. Those windows were a pain in my shooting all day and now I am highlighting them. What was I thinking "There are no rules for good Photographs, there are only good photographs" Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
98kellrs Senior Member More info | Aug 31, 2016 17:46 | #6 MRphotoIRE wrote in post #18112884 It does draw the eyes away from the bride. Thanks. Those windows were a pain in my shooting all day and now I am highlighting them. What was I thinking ![]() It's ok, you were just trying to "rescue" them as they're blown. Sometimes it's better to just go with the flow and blow them entirely for a different look as you'll never get all aspects perfect. Ryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 31, 2016 19:13 | #7 After the ceremony, I hope you talked them out of any portrait stuff with family or anything else in the church. Early on, we had a couple wanted of course just like mom and dad, portrait stuff in the church. We caught Jesus's feet on the cross in every photo. I see at least you did not have that to contend with. 2-R-6, 1-5D Mark 4, 3-5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 2-7D's, 70D, canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 24-70L II, 85 1.8, 85 1.2, 50mm, 135 mm F2 L, 17-40 , 24-105, Sigma 35 Art and 18-35 1.8, 600 EX's, Elinchrom RX and Phottix 500 strobes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1926 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||