Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 31 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 16:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2nd birding/wildlife body - 5DsR or another 7D2?

 
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 31, 2016 16:13 |  #1

I usually don't request body advice like this but I am really torn, having gone back and forth on this.

I currently have a 6D and a 7D2, and use the 7D2 with the 100-400 II for birding and general wildlifey stuff. The 6D takes care of the other stuff - landscape, family, etc.

I recently purchased a 500 II, and have been considering getting a 3rd body so that I can carry two birding-capable bodies with me in the field. I was amost convinced that I should get the 5DsR to put on the 500 II, so that I can leave my 7D2 on the 100-400 II. But now, i am wondering if I should just get a 2nd 7D2 instead. I know all the pros and cons and have gone round and round on this. The noise and DR differences between the two in the 800-1600 ISO regime where I usually reside when birding are not that compelling to me. I know that with the 5DsR, I get this amazing croppability as well as the ability to use it as a high res FF body for other applications like landscape. But I can save almost 2 grand with a 7D2 and wait for the 5DsR Mk II iwth the onchip ADC to (hopefully) come out.

Help me make this decision! :D


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 488
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
     
Aug 31, 2016 16:27 |  #2

I vote for a 1D IV.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 31, 2016 17:22 |  #3

Nah, I don't want a 1D4. I don't see the motivation to go backwards. It's either another 7D2 or the 5DsR.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Aug 31, 2016 18:22 |  #4

While the 5DsR would offer a ton of cropability, that is also extra work that goes into your workflow for each image you're processing out of that body. If you already anticipate needing to crop to begin with, I would just stick with a second 7DII and do less of that work in post. If you think you'll be able to take advantage of more of the frame and still get good shots of the birds, I'd say go for it.

Most likely, if the question is really that serious, why not check a 5DsR out from LensRentals or BorrowLenses and spend a weekend or so shooting/processing both, side by side and see how they fair?


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 31, 2016 18:23 |  #5

Yeah, I might do that. Thanks for the suggestion.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 31, 2016 19:15 |  #6

7D2 is also a lot less $, and more capable AF. (on paper)

For the price point of the 5Ds, there is also now 5D4, which would mean 6D is totally redundant and stays at home or back up only.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 31, 2016 19:18 |  #7

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18113004 (external link)
7D2 is also a lot less $, and more capable AF. (on paper)

For the price point of the 5Ds, there is also now 5D4, which would mean 6D is totally redundant and stays at home or back up only.

Thanks Jake! Yeah, the 6D to 5D4 migration is a separate thing that I will revisit once the 5D4 is available and prices have descended to reasonable levels and/or the camera is available at the refurb store. I'm in no hurry - my 6D is fantastic for what I do with it.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
virsago_mk2
Senior Member
Avatar
600 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Perth (Australia) & Semarang (Indonesia)
     
Sep 01, 2016 05:03 |  #8

5DsR for birding? Really?

7D2 is way better choice for this. Crop factor & FPS helps a lot.


Gear: Here | Portfolio: Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
medd63
Senior Member
589 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 566
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 01, 2016 10:47 |  #9

I believe the 5DsR is being considered because of the "croppability" of the 50np images.


6D, 7D2, T4i, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 100mm Macro f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 50mm f/1.4 IS, EF-S 55-250, 1.4 II TC, Kenko Extension Tubes, MeFoto Globetrotter & Roadtrip Tripods, Lightroom CC, Photoshop CC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
6,863 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Likes: 1484
Joined May 2011
Location: Gainesville, Florida
     
Sep 01, 2016 11:49 |  #10

Scrumhalf wrote in post #18112898 (external link)
Nah, I don't want a 1D4. I don't see the motivation to go backwards. It's either another 7D2 or the 5DsR.

I sort of hesitated responding to your post. Having owned both the 7D2 and the ID IV, I can only say.... I still have the ID IV. I don't really consider it older technology only because I've gotten better results from the ID IV than I did the 7D2. I have quite a few birding books and ..... they seem to have one common denominator: the 1D IV. There are so many amazing photographs in them shot with the ID IV. The birding books yet to be published will no doubt be filled with shots from the IDX and IDX ll... as well as the similar Nikon bodies.

You love your 7D2 and that's great. I've seen some excellent photographs posted here taken with it. The only reason I'm commenting at all is to say, there are several reasons why a used ID IV still holds the value it does today.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition | Editing Encouraged

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Sep 01, 2016 12:03 |  #11

Sorry, what I posted didn't come out right. I am by NO means knocking the 1D4. Heck, there's a guy over on FM that posts eagle photos with his 40D that are among the best that I have EVER seen. When I say "old," it is not as a pejorative but rather just a recognition of the fact that it is a 2009 camera and I would prefer to buy models that have benefited from technology improvements over the last few years.

And yes, I am considering the 5DsR because it is easier to track and hold BIF in the FOV with a FF camera and crop in post.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Sep 01, 2016 13:35 |  #12

Scrumhalf wrote in post #18113691 (external link)
Sorry, what I posted didn't come out right. I am by NO means knocking the 1D4. Heck, there's a guy over on FM that posts eagle photos with his 40D that are among the best that I have EVER seen. When I say "old," it is not as a pejorative but rather just a recognition of the fact that it is a 2009 camera and I would prefer to buy models that have benefited from technology improvements over the last few years.

And yes, I am considering the 5DsR because it is easier to track and hold BIF in the FOV with a FF camera and crop in post.

With the 7DII and 100-400II combo, the easiest thing I've found is setting Zone AF and 200mm, acquiring the subject and then zooming in to 400mm once you have your target. It's sort of like shooting BIF in easy mode. Still tough as hell on, say, Swallows or Kingfishers...but they're gonna be buggers no matter what. And, you still have to have the handholding technique, etc necessary to minimize your camera shake and such; but definitely helps get around the relatively narrow FOV when shooting a long lens on a crop body.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Sep 01, 2016 14:07 |  #13

I do the same thing, Eric! Doesn't work as well on my 500mm though! ;)


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Sep 01, 2016 14:15 |  #14

Scrumhalf wrote in post #18113787 (external link)
I do the same thing, Eric! Doesn't work as well on my 500mm though! ;)

Fair :)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShadowHillsPhoto
Senior Member
Avatar
534 posts
Gallery: 174 photos
Likes: 1265
Joined Aug 2015
Location: Schoharie, NY
     
Sep 02, 2016 10:15 |  #15

virsago_mk2 wrote in post #18113356 (external link)
5DsR for birding? Really?

7D2 is way better choice for this. Crop factor & FPS helps a lot.

Yes, really. Arthur Morris uses one regularly, go spend some time on the Birds as Art site and you will see what it is capable of. 7D2 fps is nice but there is no crop advantage, you can crop the 5Dsr in post and equal the 7D2 in terms of pixels on target. On top of that, if you aren't in a reach limited situation and can fill the frame with either camera, the 5Dsr walks all over the 7D2.

If it was a choice of one or the other as your only body then sure, go with a 7D2 for the versatility. In this case the OP has a 7D2 already, so the 5Dsr is a very strong contender for a second body. That said, my personal choice for about the same money is to pair a 1DX with the 7D2, which I feel gives better flexibility.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,195 views & 11 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
2nd birding/wildlife body - 5DsR or another 7D2?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
919 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.