Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 31 Aug 2016 (Wednesday) 16:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2nd birding/wildlife body - 5DsR or another 7D2?

 
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Sep 05, 2016 07:51 |  #31

One more.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/1/LQ_811699.jpg
Image hosted by forum (811699) © johnf3f [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Sep 05, 2016 10:35 |  #32

johnf3f wrote in post #18117453 (external link)
One more.
Hosted photo: posted by johnf3f in
./showthread.php?p=181​17453&i=i11820325
forum: Camera Vs. Camera

The 7DII should be providing you MUCH better results to start out with than that, John; assuming these are uncropped images. Especially with an L prime. If you have MFA'ed the lens/body and this is the best it puts out, I'd have Canon or a reputable local shop check out your AF. You *should* be able to see the individual detail in the lichen and moss on that branch, as well as much more fine detail on the bird's head and around the eye. I've had a couple of different bodies give me this sort of "smeary" result and both have been fixed by a trip to Canon.

If this is as good as your MkII gets I can totally see why you'd go with the 1, instead. I'm still interested in the comparison shots, for sure, though.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Sep 05, 2016 15:49 as a reply to  @ Snydremark's post |  #33

Very early attempts - it's first outing I think!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Sep 05, 2016 16:36 |  #34

johnf3f wrote in post #18117950 (external link)
Very early attempts - it's first outing I think!

Ahhh, gotcha


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Sep 05, 2016 17:43 as a reply to  @ Snydremark's post |  #35

To be honest I haven't used the 7D2 very much with my 800mm lens as I really bought it for travel, light weight and to use with the 100-400 Mk2.

Back in early July a friend borrowed my 7D2 and 300 F2.8 to shoot the Swansea Air Show and she got some remarkably nice shots - the camera can perform! Well at least in her hands :-)


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
power ­ shot
Member
64 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Dec 2012
     
Sep 05, 2016 23:05 |  #36

johnf3f wrote in post #18118076 (external link)
To be honest I haven't used the 7D2 very much with my 800mm lens as I really bought it for travel, light weight and to use with the 100-400 Mk2.

Back in early July a friend borrowed my 7D2 and 300 F2.8 to shoot the Swansea Air Show and she got some remarkably nice shots - the camera can perform! Well at least in her hands :-)

I KNEW it!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Sep 20, 2016 10:38 |  #37

I've gone round and round on this, and I think I'm gravitating back to just getting a second 7D2. Gotta check the used for sale sections, and keep an eye on the refurb store to see if they have a sale. If I can nab one for under a grand, that may be more palatable than a 5DsR for almost 3 grand. My 6D does just fine for non-birding use.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 20, 2016 11:10 |  #38

.

If I were facing this decision, it would be an easy choice - I'd pick the 5DsR over a 2nd 7D2 in a heartbeat.

Why? Well, over the past couple of years I have gotten more interested in prints. And I like prints that do a fair job of filling wall space - like 48" and 60" prints. I know the kind of detail I want to see in my prints, and I find that the resolution that is necessary for that degree of detail is lacking in my current gear. With the puny little 16mp files from my 1D4, I can barely get away wth a 48" print - my clients are happy with the results, but I am not, and I just wouldn't get one for myself because the lack of finely resolved detail is a little dissatisfying.

If I am going to spend hundreds of dollars for a print, I need to be absolutely thrilled with the quality, and that just isn't going to happen with 16 or 20 megapixel files at sizes upwards of 4 or 5 or 6 feet across. And I am just not interested in prints that are any smaller than that - when I see a 36" print, I usually think, "What's the point?"

If I was in your shoes, and already had a camera that wasn't capable of producing very finely detailed 60" prints, and was going to buy another body, then I would choose a body that was capable of producing the kind of prints I want to make. 50 megapixels would be a Godsend for the kinds of images I want to produce!

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Sep 20, 2016 14:25 |  #39

So, hate to throw a monkey wrench back into the works, but the feeling among us early adopters, is that the 5D4 AF set up may be better than everything else we are talking about in this thread. Definitely improved over 5Ds, or 5D3, and looking to best the 7D2!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Sep 20, 2016 14:30 |  #40

Thanks, Tom! Definitely see your point of view!

Jake, I agree, the 5D4 seems to be an awesome body, but I am loath to give up the reach of the 7D2, and the 5D4 is in the mix because of the croppability of the 50MP. I am afraid of losing that with the 5D4.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
Goldmember
Avatar
1,988 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22433
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
     
Sep 21, 2016 03:50 |  #41

It also depends how how 'good' the 5d4 pixels are and how well they crop, as some pixels crop better than others...


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aladyforty
Goldmember
Avatar
4,355 posts
Gallery: 398 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 7463
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Albany: Western Australia
Post edited over 7 years ago by aladyforty.
     
Sep 21, 2016 20:39 |  #42

I was considering selling my 7DII and 5DIII for the 5D4. I want the 10 frames per second and could probably live with the 7FPS but Im unsure about the cropability of 5D4 compared to a slight crop on 7DII for wildlife and find 99% of the time the 7DII produces really good images that clean up really well noise wise.


FUJI XT5 + XT3 & a bunch of Fuji lenses, Mavic Air2 drone
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/25426422@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Sep 26, 2016 16:51 |  #43

Scrumhalf wrote in post #18134267 (external link)
I've gone round and round on this, and I think I'm gravitating back to just getting a second 7D2. ...

I don;t know if you ever made a decision and shelled out for a 2nd body, but as soon as I discovered the AF system on the 5D4 I wanted to come back to this thread.

5D4 AF > Everything else except 1Dx2, and > than frame rate or pixels on target.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,063 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5617
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Sep 26, 2016 17:01 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #44

Not yet.. won't actually make a purchase until the holiday season and (hopefully) some sales!


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,194 views & 11 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
2nd birding/wildlife body - 5DsR or another 7D2?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
919 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.