I have been looking for a true hiking backpack for use as a photography pack for a while. Most photography backpacks in my experience are not really designed to carry a relatively heavy load for long periods of time. On the other hand, most hiking packs aren't designed with the photographer in mind. To that end, I decided to look for hiking packs that could be modified for photography use. To do this, the packs neeeded to have the following characteristics:
1. They needed to be true hiking packs, i.e. had the support systems to allow for carrying relatively heavy loads for long periods without discomfort
2. They needed to be rear loading to enable someone to put the pack on the ground, retrieve the photo gear and put the pack back on without getting one's back dirty
3. They needed to have adequate room above the photo gear to accommodate other daily gear - a ziploc back with a lunch and or snacks, and a jacket, rain shell, etc. for layering.
After a lot of reviews and searching on the web, I settled on the Gregory Tarhee 45, a ski/mountain pack. It seemed to fulfil all the 3 criteria listed above.
I'm not going to talk at length about the virtues of the pack for hiking/mountaineering/skiing. These can be found on numerous reviews online by googling the name of the pack.. I will add a few here below, as well as a Youtube video of how the pack can be used for backcountry skiing and mountain trips.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4rs9oRoVLI![]()
https://thebigoutside.com …ry-targhee-45l-snow-pack/![]()
http://www.backpackgeartest.org …%20Nancy%20Griffith/#LRPT![]()
In particular, there is a review of the pack being used precisely for what I wanted it for - as a photography/hiking pack. Here it is:
http://www.highwaytourcollective.com …ist/photographers-daypack![]()
Well, on to my review.
I ordered the pack from campsaver.com. I paid $125 for it, which seemed reasonable when compared to "photo" packs for similar use.
http://www.campsaver.com/gregory-targhee![]()
It is listed for $140 but you can find coupons floating online that will give you a bit of a discount. Just google for it.
I also ordered a photo gear insert from eBay. This one:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/171752477625![]()
It cost me about $19.
The pack is great. It really is designed for backcountry ski trips as well as mountain rescue, etc. and it has all kinds of doodads, tieoff points, etc. for carrying skis, snowboards, snowshoes, poles, avalanche rescue gear like shovels, etc. etc. You can watch the video and read the dedicated reviews for all that stuff. I don't think I'll use half that stuff, but certainly snowshoes may come in handy for hiking in winter.
Here is a photo of the pack:
The entire back of the pack (in black in the photo) opens up as a panel with a zipper giving full access to the storage area:IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LR36YK
Here is the insert:IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LNvKm5
The insert could accommodate a Rokinon 14/2.8, a 6D with a 24-70 II attached and a 70-200 F4 IS. That illustrates the rough size of the insert.IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LV6zeG
The insert could be placed easily in the storage compartment with some room on either side, probably enough to stuff a flash in if needed, although I didn't try.IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LNvK9b
There is a fair bit of room on top of the insert in the main compartment, seen in photo below. I managed to stuff a fleece jacket, a water bottle and a ziploc back with a few granola bars in it. There are also external pockets to accommodate more stuff if needed.IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LNvLwm
Since this is a ski pack, there are all kinds of strap and hooks to attach skis to the pack, and I used one of them to hang a tripod. It worked reasonably well. I didn't cinch things down enough and I am sure it would be fine and secure.IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/L1V7th
So, how did the pack perform?
I used the pack loaded pretty much as I described it (minus the tripod) on 2 days of hiking in Mt. Rainier NP. I spent 1 day doing the 6 mile Paradise Rim trail, and the 2nd day doing a 4 mile hike at Sunrise. The pack performed flawlessly and was as comfortable as any pack designed for hiking. The pack distributed the weight well on my hips and did not feel a burden to carry.
Being a ski pack, it has room for a bladder for drinking water but no side pouches for bottles (since they would freeze in the cold). I don't drink from a bladder, so I may need to come up with some kind of tie-off/cinch scheme to attach a bottle to the pack, but I view that as a minor inconvenience that can be worked around.
All i all, I am very happy with the pack and I think any backcountry photographer might want to go check one out at a hiking/skiiing store to decide for him/herself.
Thanks for reading and I hope this was useful!










