Nice! and that answered my next question! ie: how does it do with moving subjects?
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Sep 09, 2016 14:11 | #16 Nice! and that answered my next question! ie: how does it do with moving subjects? GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2016 14:31 | #17 I'm sure I got more misses than hits but the camera/adapter does focus very fast even when using the Canon lens. Now if only Sony would come out with a native 70-400 for the FE mount like they have for A mount. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-Duck- my head is usually in the way More info | Sep 09, 2016 15:01 | #18 Let me say, for all those "naysayers" who look down on these cameras, you have presented a very strong argument for them. Very impressive. "If you didn't learn something new today, you wasted a day."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ardeekay Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 09, 2016 17:50 | #19 Being somewhat critical only because I'd like to learn more about this camera. Detail is only fair-any specific reasons for the slow ss and low iso? The 5000iso in the earlier shots seems to give you a lot of range here. As said, interested. Rog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 7 years ago by navydoc. (2 edits in all) | Sep 10, 2016 05:01 | #20 ardeekay wrote in post #18122636 Being somewhat critical only because I'd like to learn more about this camera. Detail is only fair-any specific reasons for the slow ss and low iso? The 5000iso in the earlier shots seems to give you a lot of range here. As said, interested. Thank you! No specific reason. I saw the hummingbird at the feeder through my patio's sliding door so I grabbed my camera that just happened to have the 100-400 lens still on it from earlier in the day. I had the camera set up for AV mode and auto iso with a minimum shutter speed of 1/125 and that works fine for static shots. My feeder is in the shade so I also had an exposure compensation of +0.3 dialed in. Image hosted by forum (812782) © navydoc [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ardeekay Cream of the Crop More info | Thanks, Gene. I'm often caught with the wrong settings because I didn't have time or didn't think to change. Also interesting they are as curious about us as we them. Have been nose-to-nose with a hummer on several occasions. Rog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2016 06:29 | #22 Thank you for the information! Jack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2016 07:51 | #23 jack_dorsey wrote in post #18123134 Thank you for the information! How well does the rig work if you turn IS off on the lens? I have a Canon 400 5.6 lens than I'd like to use with a light lens with IS in the body. I've been dealing with Sciatica from a herniated disk. So at times I've been using my SL1 with the 400 5.6 which I find much more comfortable than my 7D II and 100-400 mark II. If I can get IS in the working in a camera, I'll make the change. Jack Before I try to answer your question, it's important to understand that what makes all this possible is the adapter used to connect the Canon lenses to the Sony body. I use the Metabones Smart Adapter IV. There are now other 'smart' adapters out there that are cheaper but I still think Metabones works the best. Here's what photography blogger Brian Smith has to say about these adapters. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2016 12:39 | #24 I guess this could be considered to be part of my birding setup. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ardeekay Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 10, 2016 17:58 | #25 Very ingenious, Gene. Love the look of it, too. Rog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2016 18:24 | #26 ardeekay wrote in post #18123657 Very ingenious, Gene. Love the look of it, too. Thanks. Hopefully, I'll be able to post a pic of a hummer splashing around in it and having fun soon. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thank you! Your info along with the Brian Smith blog provides me a good start toward making decision. I've got a lot to check out before making a decision. I'll wait a bit to see if the latest medical approach helps reduce my sciatica. Jack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1673 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||