Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Sep 2016 (Wednesday) 13:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

-= 5D Mark IV owners unite! Post photos and discuss.

 
white ­ venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1254
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
     
Apr 16, 2017 20:29 |  #2581

I finally had some time to shoot baseball with the 5D4

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2805/34083816695_4d23865f1d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TVSt​eZ  (external link) 5D4_8310 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2835/33699530910_f087d25155_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TkUU​t1  (external link) 5D4_8198 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2888/33953771981_a0157b69b5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TJnX​tK  (external link) 5D4_8356 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

Now I have the itch for a 300 2.8...

Gear List~Website (external link)~Facebook (external link)~500px (external link)~flickr (external link)
Feedback-1 2345

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2791
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Apr 16, 2017 20:41 |  #2582

white venom wrote in post #18329792 (external link)
Now I have the itch for a 300 2.8...

Nice shots... don't go 300 go 400 2.8 trust me.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
white ­ venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1254
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
     
Apr 16, 2017 21:01 as a reply to  @ Talley's post |  #2583

I was going to go 300 and a 1.4 teleconverter when needed


Gear List~Website (external link)~Facebook (external link)~500px (external link)~flickr (external link)
Feedback-1 2345

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
Goldmember
Avatar
1,786 posts
Gallery: 122 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 19465
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
     
Apr 16, 2017 21:17 |  #2584

white venom wrote in post #18329811 (external link)
I was going to go 300 and a 1.4 teleconverter when needed

Great combo and eminently more hand holdable vs the 400 2.8.


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Avatar
4,303 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 200
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Apr 17, 2017 05:52 |  #2585

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #18329769 (external link)
Beautiful photos!
I never considered the f/4. I'll have to give it some thought.

Thanks. I never thought i would replace the f/2.8 but ive wanted a macro lens for a while, and I'm really too lazy to take one out along with my normal lenses, so this seemed ideal. I must admit ive been blown away with the IQ so far. Close enough to the f/2.8 that i wont notice any real drop in IQ, although of course ill loose a stop of light. IS will make up for that in most cases though (for me anyway).


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon EOS-M50 | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edmidlifecrisis
Goldmember
Avatar
4,219 posts
Gallery: 242 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 31514
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Palm Beach County, FL
     
Apr 17, 2017 06:43 |  #2586

dave_bass5 wrote in post #18330032 (external link)
Thanks. I never thought i would replace the f/2.8 but ive wanted a macro lens for a while, and I'm really too lazy to take one out along with my normal lenses, so this seemed ideal. I must admit ive been blown away with the IQ so far. Close enough to the f/2.8 that i wont notice any real drop in IQ, although of course ill loose a stop of light. IS will make up for that in most cases though (for me anyway).

I have one I have been using with my 6D for a while (a fine combination) and it seems to work well on the 5 also, no reason it shouldn't! I like this lens a lot. The IS and the higher ISO capabilities of the FF don't seem to penalize the lack of an f2.8. Great lens and not too bulky or heavy and the additional near focus ability is a plus. Also I like black "L" lenses way better then the "whites"....:)


Ed
https://www.sandhillim​ages.com/ (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127634200@N05/ (external link)
https://500px.com/edtl (external link)
Instagram @elsdvm90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rwmson
Senior Member
Avatar
680 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Likes: 1274
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Exit 4, NJ USA
     
Apr 17, 2017 06:54 |  #2587

South Jersey marshlands, Saturday morning.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


yeah, I gots some stuff.
Roger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACESFULL82
Senior Member
Avatar
740 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Likes: 1449
Joined Aug 2013
Location: texas
     
Apr 17, 2017 07:00 |  #2588

white venom wrote in post #18329811 (external link)
I was going to go 300 and a 1.4 teleconverter when needed

Thats what i shoot with, the 300 F2.8 IS II, add on a 1.4 or 2x teleconverter and theres really no loss in IQ. I shoot baseball and football when i need the 2.8 then add on the 2X tele and cover airshows. THe 400 would be nice but i couldnt justify the extra $, and for what i paid for this, its quiet a bit. Lol


Canon crap and Canon lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
Avatar
4,432 posts
Gallery: 879 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 11338
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Applecross, Scotland
     
Apr 17, 2017 07:42 |  #2589

Some shinty from the weekend.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2886/33675176690_260f655cfe_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TiL5​NE  (external link) Kinlochshiel v Beauly (external link) by Annie MacDonald (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2889/34019272046_bd8625b04e_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TQaE​nd  (external link) Kinlochshiel v Beauly (external link) by Annie MacDonald (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bwhip
Senior Member
Avatar
707 posts
Likes: 1903
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Idaho, USA
     
Apr 17, 2017 08:21 |  #2590

Took a little ride yesterday...

IMAGE: http://bwhip.com/galleries/BlogPhotos/oregonride_041617/6U4A7655-Edit.jpg

IMAGE: http://bwhip.com/galleries/BlogPhotos/oregonride_041617/6U4A7669.jpg

IMAGE: http://bwhip.com/galleries/BlogPhotos/oregonride_041617/6U4A7702-Edit.jpg

bwhip's blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
Avatar
4,224 posts
Gallery: 416 photos
Likes: 12973
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Gainesville, GA
     
Apr 17, 2017 09:41 |  #2591

I know there has been a lot of talk regarding the high ISO ability of the 5DIV. Unless I'm shooting during twilight I almost never see anything above 200 anyway, so historically that hasn't mattered to me a lot. On the few occasions I've used higher ISO's previously I have never been too happy with the results. I got out over the weekend and tried something (needed to basically due to high water flow) and shot this image at ISO 800.

Now, I'll have to say that when processing the image it took quite a bit more work than I typically have to do. I noticed a loss of detail in some of the elements that are further away, and of course there was more noise to deal with, particularly in the darker shadow areas. With shots like this, I typically have to pull up the exposure overall a decent amount, and the shadows even more to keep from clipping portions of the water.

Overall I'm pretty impressed. While I had much rather have this image at ISO 50-200, it ended up being very usable. I certainly wouldn't want to go that high unless I needed to, but it has the ability.

I realize this doesn't apply for people shooting subjects that typically need the quicker shutter speeds, but for a landscape image I find this pretty impressive from an image quality standpoint.

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Waterfalls/i-bxPQKCf/0/X2/IMG_17102-170415-X2.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …02-170415-X2.jpg&lb=1&s=A  (external link) on Smugmug

John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,668 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
     
Apr 17, 2017 10:31 |  #2592

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18323519 (external link)
The Last Muscle car! Nice.

there's one on steroids that's about to be released.

http://www.dodge.com/d​emon.html (external link)


www.tinnitus-photography.com (external link)
Facebook link (external link)

gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
3,029 posts
Gallery: 1307 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 21104
Joined Feb 2014
     
Apr 17, 2017 12:51 |  #2593

narlus wrote in post #18330232 (external link)
there's one on steroids that's about to be released.

http://www.dodge.com/d​emon.html (external link)

and it's PROPERLY engineered from the start for quarter mile runs (tires/suspension/etc)


https://chrismarkes.sm​ugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Avatar
4,303 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 200
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Apr 17, 2017 16:29 |  #2594

edmidlifecrisis wrote in post #18330069 (external link)
I have one I have been using with my 6D for a while (a fine combination) and it seems to work well on the 5 also, no reason it shouldn't! I like this lens a lot. The IS and the higher ISO capabilities of the FF don't seem to penalize the lack of an f2.8. Great lens and not too bulky or heavy and the additional near focus ability is a plus. Also I like black "L" lenses way better then the "whites"....:)

Yeah, totally agree, especially about the white lenses.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon EOS-M50 | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
View_Finder
Senior Member
Avatar
512 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 1309
Joined May 2010
Location: Ohio
     
Apr 17, 2017 19:50 |  #2595

dave_bass5 wrote in post #18330529 (external link)
Yeah, totally agree, especially about the white lenses.

What did I miss? What's wrong with the white lenses???


R5, 5D4, 7D2, 50D: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400L IS II, 100 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/4L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, Σ14A, Σ35A, Σ85A
http://viewfinder.us/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,725,430 views & 44,683 likes for this thread
-= 5D Mark IV owners unite! Post photos and discuss.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is tushrk
893 guests, 269 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.