THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Sep 07, 2016 21:00 | #1 Image hosted by forum (812295) © Evertking [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hinson Goldmember More info | Sep 07, 2016 22:06 | #2 Evertking wrote in post #18120446 Hosted photo: posted by Evertking in ./showthread.php?p=18120446&i=i109597511 forum: Critique Corner Nice work. Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 08, 2016 07:34 | #3 I'm liking that...for your own knowledge, try moving the flash to various places. The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
olafsosh I am a nice and fluffy dude More info | Sep 08, 2016 08:18 | #4 Yes, quality image. - Olafs Osh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DThriller Goldmember More info | Sep 08, 2016 14:25 | #5 I think you need to play around with the white balance a little bit http://www.facebook.com/DPhillipsStudios
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MartinDixon Slit-scan project master More info | Sep 08, 2016 16:59 | #6 The doll rather steals the attention from the subject(s) flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bob_r Goldmember More info | Sep 08, 2016 17:15 | #7 osh_sekta wrote in post #18120881 Yes, quality image. Just a slight "meh" - either put the gel on the flash or warm up the lit part in the post - different temperatures are really apparent :] I agree with Olafs. Hope you don't mind, but I did a very quick edit just so you could see the difference. If you want me to delete this, let me know. Image hosted by forum (812447) © bob_r [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PineBomb I have many notable flaws More info Post edited over 7 years ago by PineBomb. | Sep 08, 2016 18:54 | #8 Martin Dixon wrote in post #18121457 The doll rather steals the attention from the subject(s) Despite its sinister inference, I do think it bears a lovely rim light. -Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | Sep 08, 2016 18:56 | #9 bob_r wrote in post #18121476 I agree with Olafs. Hope you don't mind, but I did a very quick edit just so you could see the difference. If you want me to delete this, let me know. The area on her cheek where his arm cast a shadow from the flash and her right arm are going to need special attention. This Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 08, 2016 22:26 | #10 bob_r wrote in post #18121476 I agree with Olafs. Hope you don't mind, but I did a very quick edit just so you could see the difference. If you want me to delete this, let me know. The area on her cheek where his arm cast a shadow from the flash and her right arm are going to need special attention. No..no.. THANKS for showing me that. I'm VERY new to this. And I LOVE the corrections you made. Now, just tell me how to do it. Lol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DagoImaging Goldmember More info Post edited over 7 years ago by DagoImaging. (2 edits in all) | Sep 09, 2016 07:01 | #11 One way to balance the color after the fact in your image... Image hosted by forum (812553) © DagoImaging [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2016 07:11 | #12 The method w/ guassian blur works best if you remove the subject from the background first w/ a quick patch (content aware) Image hosted by forum (812554) © DagoImaging [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. then use the mask on the blurred layer. Image hosted by forum (812555) © DagoImaging [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hinson Goldmember More info | Sep 09, 2016 07:24 | #13 Evertking wrote in post #18121755 No..no.. THANKS for showing me that. I'm VERY new to this. And I LOVE the corrections you made. Now, just tell me how to do it. Lol Thanks Another method you can try is a simple levels white balance. Here I opened the levels properties, grabbed the white eye dropper (bottom of the three) and clicked on the baby's white waist band. I normally do this first, because it's quick and easy and in many cases will be the only adjustment needed. Image hosted by forum (812560) © Hinson [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1273 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||