Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 07 Sep 2016 (Wednesday) 21:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PhotoClam PC-40

 
Mudhog79
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 169
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southeast Louisiana
     
Sep 07, 2016 21:26 |  #1

Hello All,

I have a quick question about my tripod setup. I have a fiesol 3441T tripod with a PhotoClam PC-40 head. I have been using a Canon XSi rebel on it with a 17-55mm f2.8 or a 55-250mm f4/5.6. I loosen the tension knob on the head when i have the camera mounted, i get whatever i am shooting framed the way i want it, while holding the lens i tighten the tension know. When i let go of the lens after doing this i notice the focal point drops down. Is this normal for this setup? I am asking b/c i have just upgraded to a Canon 7D Mkii (thanks to the wife) which is a heavier camera and would like to eventually get a larger telephoto lens (Canon 400mm f5.6 or of the likes) and am concerned the droop will be worse. I am thinking of selling my pretty much brand new ball head for something else if this is how this head functions.

Thanks for any and all input.


Canon EOS 7D Mark II, EFS 55-250mm IS, EF 50mm f/1.4, EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS, 430 EXII Speedlite, Fiesol 3441T, Photo Clam PC-40NS
FramedMoments (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sawsedge
Senior Member
Avatar
853 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 108
Joined Dec 2011
Location: United States
     
Sep 08, 2016 20:33 |  #2

Here are the possibilities:

One is normal settling because you are adding force to the system while you hold the camera, and when you let go, you remove your input and the system settles.

Two, all ballheads shift a little bit during lockdown, even the best ones. I saw it happen with my Kirk BH-1 under tension (it did it less without tension), and it happens a bit with my Arca-Swiss Z1. It bugs me when when I'm trying to be precise with closeups (I'm still thinking about a geared head for that). This test shows the shift... https://www.dpreview.c​om …d-sized-ball-heads-tested (external link)... and this... https://www.dpreview.c​om …ans-top-ball-heads-tested (external link)

Three, if the ballhead isn't strong enough (which I don't think is the case with that model), it can droop/sag over time.


- John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mudhog79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 169
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southeast Louisiana
     
Sep 08, 2016 21:38 as a reply to  @ sawsedge's post |  #3

Thanks,

It is probably just the fact that i am supporting the weight, locking in the focal point, locking the ball in place then loading up the whole system. It got to be frustrating when i was trying to shoot some macro shots for a 52 week photo challenge. Yes i picked the specific model i have based on the weights of what i thought i would be shooting at the time.

Thanks


Canon EOS 7D Mark II, EFS 55-250mm IS, EF 50mm f/1.4, EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS, 430 EXII Speedlite, Fiesol 3441T, Photo Clam PC-40NS
FramedMoments (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Sep 09, 2016 17:33 |  #4

There are very few ball heads (that I have come across) that will not sag to some extent. I am not familiar with your particular model but I have found that both my Sirui K40X and Triopo RS3 give little if any sag depending on the camera + lens used.

This effect can be reduced/eliminated by balancing your set up better. A quick and dirty solution may be to attach a long QR plate to your camera. It will be inconvenient but it would allow you to move your camera backwards and forwards to achieve a better balance. Something like this (or a little shorter) would do - cheaper than a new head but you will be taking it on and off quite a lot!

http://www.ebay.co.uk …d43b58:g:UWEAAO​SwV0RXv7B9 (external link)

Sorry about the picture quality but I just put this together quickly so you could get the idea and my good camera is in the shot!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812697.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812697) © johnf3f [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mudhog79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 169
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southeast Louisiana
     
Sep 09, 2016 20:53 |  #5

johnf3f wrote in post #18122615 (external link)
There are very few ball heads (that I have come across) that will not sag to some extent. I am not familiar with your particular model but I have found that both my Sirui K40X and Triopo RS3 give little if any sag depending on the camera + lens used.

This effect can be reduced/eliminated by balancing your set up better. A quick and dirty solution may be to attach a long QR plate to your camera. It will be inconvenient but it would allow you to move your camera backwards and forwards to achieve a better balance. Something like this (or a little shorter) would do - cheaper than a new head but you will be taking it on and off quite a lot!

http://www.ebay.co.uk …d43b58:g:UWEAAO​SwV0RXv7B9 (external link)

Sorry about the picture quality but I just put this together quickly so you could get the idea and my good camera is in the shot!
Hosted photo: posted by johnf3f in
./showthread.php?p=181​22615&i=i151657041
forum: Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support

Thanks for the feedback John, my ball head looks very similar to what you are running. I will look into what you have proposed as a possible solution as well.

Thanks again.


Canon EOS 7D Mark II, EFS 55-250mm IS, EF 50mm f/1.4, EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS, 430 EXII Speedlite, Fiesol 3441T, Photo Clam PC-40NS
FramedMoments (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Sep 10, 2016 18:03 as a reply to  @ Mudhog79's post |  #6

The ball head (Sirui K40X) is quite a bit more substantial then the Photoclam PC 40. If you had one of these Sirui heads then the problem would not exist. Unfortunately that would involve spending money (as well as carrying the extra weight) and we don't like that sort of thing!

Using a longer QR plate mounted fore and aft is, as I said, a quick and dirty solution - but it works and is very cheap!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mudhog79
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 169
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southeast Louisiana
     
Sep 10, 2016 21:51 |  #7

johnf3f wrote in post #18123661 (external link)
The ball head (Sirui K40X) is quite a bit more substantial then the Photoclam PC 40. If you had one of these Sirui heads then the problem would not exist. Unfortunately that would involve spending money (as well as carrying the extra weight) and we don't like that sort of thing!

Using a longer QR plate mounted fore and aft is, as I said, a quick and dirty solution - but it works and is very cheap!

Thanks i have been looking at the longer QR plates, not sure what you mean by more substantial but they both have the same published weight load of 77 lbs. The Sirui does weigh a good bit more and had a larger ball. Cost wise they are comparable. I am going to try your suggested route, if that doesn't sit well still i may look into an Acratech which is what i was originally looking at. I just couldn't afford it at the time.

Thanks again.


Canon EOS 7D Mark II, EFS 55-250mm IS, EF 50mm f/1.4, EFS 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS, 430 EXII Speedlite, Fiesol 3441T, Photo Clam PC-40NS
FramedMoments (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sawsedge
Senior Member
Avatar
853 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 108
Joined Dec 2011
Location: United States
     
Sep 11, 2016 15:37 |  #8

The load ratings are meaningless. Only one company that I know of publishes their testing methodology (Really Right Stuff). The rest just publish numbers.

Arca-Swiss claims the Z1 can handle around 130 lbs, but I doubt it is any stronger than the Kirk BH-1, the Sirui K-40X, or the RRS BH-55, which have lower "ratings".

Try this... using your tripod on a solid surface at a wide stance so nothing can fall... see if you can lock the head down just tight enough that the gear doesn't flop over. Then very carefully tighten the knob further and see if the head shifts. You need to avoid touching anything else while you try it.

The other thing is, your ballhead needs to be strong enough to hold your gear at any angle. I assume the Photoclam is strong enough but maybe not? Try various angles and make sure it doesn't creep.


- John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Sep 11, 2016 15:53 |  #9

As Sawsedge correctly observes the weight ratings are meaningless - it's the same with tripods.

Strong though my Sirui K40X is it is certainly not fit for a 77lb load or half that!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,795 views & 1 like for this thread, 3 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
PhotoClam PC-40
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1427 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.