Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
Thread started 08 Sep 2016 (Thursday) 05:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Trying to understand Lightroom's HDR

 
beano
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
Post edited over 7 years ago by beano.
     
Sep 08, 2016 05:06 |  #1

I've just started playing with Lightroom's HDR function and am a little confused by the results.

I'm using 3 imaged 2 stops apart and when I merge them, lightroom produces an image with the highlights at -100, Shadows boosted and exposure boosted!?! Due to the boost in shadows and exposure, there is noise in the image. What I don't understand is why? The 3 images should cover the entire dynamic range, so there should be no need to boost, or subtract anything!?! This leaves me with absolutely no control once I get back into Lightroom.

Any pointers from the more experienced Lightroom users out there would be very much appreciated..


Thanks


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
Avatar
4,544 posts
Gallery: 917 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 12006
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Applecross, Scotland
     
Sep 08, 2016 06:06 |  #2

I've got exactly the same issue - lots of noise in areas which 'should' have been properly exposed if extracted from the correct image. Hopefully someone will chime in with a solution.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aparis99
Senior Member
Avatar
278 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 63
Joined Nov 2006
Location: KY
Post edited over 7 years ago by aparis99.
     
Sep 08, 2016 15:01 |  #3

You must have AutoTone checked. That's just a starting point and takes care of some of the basics it seems, Highlights -100, Shadows at +70, whites up 15 and blacks down 15 or so is usually what I see.
My issue with LR HDR is how in the world it handles white balance sometimes. It's difficult to get decent outdoor shots from my experience. Also, even indoor from time to time really gets messed up.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812427.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812427) © aparis99 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

My Site - www.apimagery.com (external link)
Canon R5 (x2), Canon RF 15-35 f/2.8L IS, Canon RF 24-70 f/2.8L, Canon RF 70-200 f/2.8L, Canon RF 100-500L, Sigma Art 35 f/1.4, Canon 85 f/1.8, Canon 100 f/2.8L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Sep 08, 2016 15:56 |  #4

I think I may have had auto tone checked, as it looked better in the preview, so I'll try it again without.. Thanks.
As for the white balance issue, I saw a tutorial that said to sync the shots and adjust the white balance before merging the HDR. Have you tried that?


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aparis99
Senior Member
Avatar
278 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 63
Joined Nov 2006
Location: KY
     
Sep 08, 2016 16:09 as a reply to  @ beano's post |  #5

Yes, but Adobe's own words describes how it carries over, so if you make pre-adjustments, only a few items come over, and they affect all of them. It's pretty confusing, but basically, change it all you want, but it's going to just combine the 3 RAW files as they are.


My Site - www.apimagery.com (external link)
Canon R5 (x2), Canon RF 15-35 f/2.8L IS, Canon RF 24-70 f/2.8L, Canon RF 70-200 f/2.8L, Canon RF 100-500L, Sigma Art 35 f/1.4, Canon 85 f/1.8, Canon 100 f/2.8L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Monkey ­ moss
Goldmember
Avatar
1,341 posts
Likes: 1998
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Bristol, England
     
Sep 25, 2016 01:43 |  #6

Hi, as mentioned above, the auto tone box is checked on. However it's possible you might have the same problem I'm getting. I've just finally signed up to LR CC and the HDR function goes though the motions of blending, but then just produces a dng of one of the original photos. See my query on the LR help forum below if interested. If you have the same problem it would be worth commenting...

https://forums.adobe.c​om/message/8986650#898​6650 (external link)


Jon :cool::oops::D:cry::confused::(:lol:
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jabtas
Goldmember
Avatar
3,058 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 2407
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Teesside UK
     
Sep 25, 2016 03:30 |  #7

I found LRs built-in HDR to be a very poor 2nd to a dedicated HDR program

Check out Nik HDR Efex Pro, in fact the whole Nik suite is a great addition, works seamlessly as a LR addon and its free


Tim
Some Canon stuff, some Sigma stuff and yet more Canon stuff
My Gallery - http://www.pbase.com/j​abtas (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KaosImagery
Goldmember
Avatar
1,543 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1955
Joined Sep 2009
Location: near Saratoga Springs, NY
     
Sep 25, 2016 08:24 |  #8

I recently shot some very high end Trex decks for friend who builds them. We only had two days to shoot 15 locations because he was on a deadline to enter the photos for a national deck design competition, so I had no control over what time of day we could shoot and many locations where heavily treed or backlit.

I mostly shot 3 image brackets at 2EV apart on the 5D3 and used LR CC to create the HDRs. The DNG created by LR looked very much like the evenly exposed image but I found it had alot more headroom when pushing and pulling shadows and highlights. Simply adjusting the sliders did not give ideal results. I had to use the brush tool and selectively dodge and burn areas to get the best results.

Even lightening dark shadows worked pretty well with one exception - objects that were in movement. Many of these decks had umbrellas, wind chimes and other such items movement from the wind. For some reason, when bring shadows up on these items, I did get quite a bit of noise, I think it was the way LR handled the ghosting. If I used the lightest setting for ghosting, the result was little or no noise, but at times the movement was obvious so I had to retouch some of those images in PS to correct for that.

I do have Photomatix and Nik HDR Efex, which may have produced better end results, but the workflow through LR for this time critical project was much faster, I had nearly 100 images to edit in about 8 hours to make the deadline.


Website (external link) flickr (external link) FaceBook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Oct 02, 2016 02:41 |  #9

jabtas wrote in post #18139583 (external link)
I found LRs built-in HDR to be a very poor 2nd to a dedicated HDR program

Check out Nik HDR Efex Pro, in fact the whole Nik suite is a great addition, works seamlessly as a LR addon and its free

Gonna give Nik HDR Efex a try.. im not getting the results i want from lightroom and im wondering if thats why..


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,529 views & 1 like for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Trying to understand Lightroom's HDR
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1055 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.