Please help...

I tried to tweak my monitor's settings and preferred to what I see from it right now... However, I am worried if I am within the "tolerable" calibration.

In my screen, this image is crisp and well exposed, could you tell what you see in yours? Exposure and Color Balance in particular.
By the way, I see it a bit warm in my monitor. Thanks in advance guys.

I am not too sure what you are looking for?? What I see is a reasonably well balanced image. If it were my image, there are perhaps a few things I would tweak, but nothing necessarily major. I don't see it as being a "bit warm" but that could be my monitor or my preferences.

I see what appears to be somewhat unnaturally saturated skies of a blue lnot usually seen in nature. Overall color balance seems to be neutral (not cool, not warm)

Thank you sirs...

Looks good on my monitor, but I do agree with Wilt on the blue sky:

Wilt wrote in post #18124317
I see what appears to be somewhat unnaturally saturated skies of a blue lnot usually seen in nature. Overall color balance seems to be neutral (not cool, not warm)

Beekeeper wrote in post #18124729
Looks good on my monitor, but I do agree with Wilt on the blue sky:

Thanks... I see it as over saturated too. Maybe I over tweaked the dehaze slider.

How about this one? I reduced the dehaze level and increased the contrast and clarity...

Still seeing a bit too much saturation in the natural colours. Some like that, actually I like that sometimes, but this just seems to overdo it a little. In LR I would consider maybe pulling the Blue Primary Saturation slider back a bit in the Calibration tab. If you did not want to do it there, then I would go with the blue and maybe purple saturation slider, as well as possibly a little negative on the green slider too in the HSL tab.

Alan

It looks OK to me, but I might back off on the contrast a bit. Personally, I'd have deleted that image before I got to that point? ; )

I just took a shot from a trip to the Czech Republic this summer, and from that shot I only the skies overlooking a large lake, to represent the range of blue that can be captured without exaggerated color saturation, simply as a basis of comparison to OP before and after. The wide AOV afforded a good representation of how the blue saturation varies across the sky, even without a CPL in front of the lens!

.

I agree that the blue sky was way too saturated in the first image, and that it is still too saturated in the revised version.

The exposure looks fine. The color temperature looks fine, too....if anything it is a wee bit cool (based on the soil and grass).

.