Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Nikon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Nikon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Sep 2016 (Monday) 09:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Need a new, full frame zoom lens for wedding photography

 
Cleveland-Wedding-Photographer
Hatchling
Avatar
9 posts
Joined Sep 2016
     
Sep 12, 2016 09:39 |  #1

Suggestions? Shooting with a 750 and need something that will allow me to stay on the outskirts of a wedding ceremony and still get the "money shots" when the time called for it.

If you have a favorite prime, I'd like to hear what/why for that too!


Shawn Moreau
Cleveland, Colorado, Destination Wedding Photographer (external link)
Moreau & Company Wedding Photography
Located in Cleveland, Ohio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,648 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 595
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Sep 12, 2016 18:25 |  #2

70-200 maybe. I think one guy on these forums (umphotography maybe) uses a Sigma 120-300 for the same sort of scenario you are asking about.

Primes, well I guess it depends how far back you are and how you want to frame the shot. I reckon anything from the new Nikkor 105 and up could be used to great effect


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZ ­ Pix
Senior Member
559 posts
Likes: 84
Joined Jan 2010
     
Sep 12, 2016 22:23 |  #3

In my opinion (however limited when it comes to weddings), nothing beats a 70-200 2.8 for doing exactly what you described. You can do a bunch with an 85mm 1.4 or 1.8, and I would guess even with a 105mm or 135mm prime, but if the goal is to stay on the outskirts and snipe, the pro zoom is where it is. I know someone who does quite well sneaking around with his 200mm F2, on one body and 85mm 1.4 on another, but that's a different category of shooter all together. What's in your wallet?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cleveland-Wedding-Photographer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
9 posts
Joined Sep 2016
     
Sep 13, 2016 08:06 as a reply to  @ smythie's post |  #4

I love the 70-200! It really is amazing. I have a close friend who let's me borrow his whenever we shoot weddings (and he's not using it of course). My fear is that I'll invest in the 70-200 and then find out that there's a better option out there.


Shawn Moreau
Cleveland, Colorado, Destination Wedding Photographer (external link)
Moreau & Company Wedding Photography
Located in Cleveland, Ohio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cleveland-Wedding-Photographer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
9 posts
Joined Sep 2016
     
Sep 13, 2016 08:09 |  #5

AZ Pix wrote in post #18126154 (external link)
In my opinion (however limited when it comes to weddings), nothing beats a 70-200 2.8 for doing exactly what you described. You can do a bunch with an 85mm 1.4 or 1.8, and I would guess even with a 105mm or 135mm prime, but if the goal is to stay on the outskirts and snipe, the pro zoom is where it is. I know someone who does quite well sneaking around with his 200mm F2, on one body and 85mm 1.4 on another, but that's a different category of shooter all together. What's in your wallet?


I'm glad to hear that. I have my eye on the 70-200, but want to make sure that there's not a secret amazing alternative that I'm unaware of... because I'd find out about it 2 days after my purchase.


Shawn Moreau
Cleveland, Colorado, Destination Wedding Photographer (external link)
Moreau & Company Wedding Photography
Located in Cleveland, Ohio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,648 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 595
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Sep 13, 2016 08:26 |  #6

If you want flexibility in the telephoto region, there's not really much better, particularly if you match it with a D810. The big Sigma I mentioned gives a bit more range but at a big weight disadvantage and so it's much harder to handhold for a long period.

I strongly doubt you'll be disappointed with the 70-200 VR2


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eth3rton
Goldmember
Avatar
1,156 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 108
Joined Oct 2008
Location: KY, USA
     
Oct 15, 2016 08:11 |  #7

The 70–200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR (external link) (VR3) was recently announced as well.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BAngene
Junior Member
Avatar
29 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined May 2016
Location: Miami, FL USA
     
Jan 13, 2017 11:41 |  #8

The 70-200 2.8 VR is going to be the best bet here Shawn. That is because you will be on the outskirts like you want and you will be able to nail the shots even in low light. I've never had a better lens for doing what you are talking about and it will be $2k well spent if wedding photography is what you do all the time. Then when you decide you want to do some sports on the side in a dimly light gym, you'll also find this lens will be your best friend.


Miami wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
olsonsview
Hatchling
1 post
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2017
     
Jan 15, 2017 06:31 |  #9

I am a retired wedding photographer. For the task you described: you would be hard pressed to beat the 70-200 range of fast VR zooms, f2.8, that Nikon has produced. I used one for years, and it never failed to get me amazing shots in even very dim light. The VR feature was indispensable, and the f2.8 constant aperture made focus precise. I tried third party zooms, but was never as satisfied as I was with the Nikon product. It was a lot of money for me to spend when my children were in college, but I consider that lens a good investment to this day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Boringjay
Junior Member
22 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2017
     
Apr 11, 2017 21:03 |  #10

i would recommend nikon 24-70




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,466 views & 2 likes for this thread
Need a new, full frame zoom lens for wedding photography
FORUMS Nikon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Nikon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mphunt
775 guests, 265 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.