sthayer5 wrote in post #18126783
I have a canon T4i body and i want to shoot the night sky and the stars. I do have a Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 USM II, which i have been using but i want to purchase another lens. So i need is some advice on a great lens to shoot with my T4i.
Thanks
Heya,
Well, there's a few ways to look at this. You could get a fast F2 or F2.8 lens, a prime, that is sharp wide open and fast aperture for night sky long exposure. $300~400 easy. Or, you could consider a tracker mount, around $300 or so, which will allow you to increase exposure time upwards of 4 minutes pretty easily, without trails, even with modest telephoto focal lengths, let alone wide angles, this way you can use all your lenses, not just fast ones, for the night sky & stars. It ultimately opens more doors.
If you just want a lens, take a look at the Rokinon 16mm F2 (this is for APS-C), its' really fast for what it is, and wide enough to get 30 seconds at F2. That extra stop of light is a big deal.
If you want to explore a tracker, look to the Sky-watcher Star Adventurer. Similar cost. But it allows you to do much longer exposures, lifting the need for high ISO and lifting the need for fast aperture, so you can have more fun with any lens basically. It can handle heavy payloads of big serious lenses too, let alone light weight wide stuff.
If you're really into the night sky, go with the tracker. It will serve you more and longer.
+++++++++++++++
I did similar with a T4i. I still use my T4i for astro. Here's the kind of results I was able to get, without much effort, using a tracker and any lens I pleased (these are all T4i):
85mm
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/kPpDSi
DPP_0782
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
35mm
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/kPrHsE
DPP_0778
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
35mm
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/JL7D9P
MilkyWayAntares762016
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
16mm
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/nS8keV
IMG_5174
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
Trackers really open the door, so you can use any lens really, even slower ones, because you can overcome the
time limitation before trails happen, as the tracker moves at the same speed as the planet's rotation. It's a lot easier with wider lenses. I found 85mm and lower to be literally a cake walk to get working. You don't need fancy hard to do alignment, it helps and you can get into it and do it nicely and get even better results, but honestly, these things can be pointed North, and adjust a knob to your latitude, and start imaging 60s to 120s with reckless abandon.
I was using an Ioptron skytracker in the above examples. It's good. But now that the Sky-watcher star adventurer is out and matured, I'd suggest that one instead (it didn't exist when I got mine). Same cost! The sky-watcher is better in every way and can be upgraded and has accessories. Best $300 you'll spend in astro short of having a camera at all.
How it looks using one:
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/zLAM2A
IMG_8851
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/HUsH18
20160705_224831
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/JL7EEp
20160706_233233
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
1/10 • f/1.7 • ISO 640
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/JL7EMi
20160706_233206
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
Very best,