New Canon EOS M5 Mirrorless

Iggy12 wrote in post #18198330
Looks nice and clean for ISO 6400

It's bright thats why. Go shoot 6400 F2 and 1/60 and post again...

Talley wrote in post #18198532
It's bright thats why. Go shoot 6400 F2 and 1/60 and post again...

i think that'd be even brighter...more like all white...

DreDaze wrote in post #18198543
i think that'd be even brighter...more like all white...

lol

meaning go shoot in light that my setting would provide proper exposure.

Kai posted his review on his new YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=PhHpV0kc7as

Looks great... if they only had a few more lens selection

35 F2 IS pancake and some constant aperture zooms... even if they are F4.

Talley wrote in post #18198732
Looks great... if they only had a few more lens selection

35 F2 IS pancake and some constant aperture zooms... even if they are F4.

+1. 35 F2 would really make me consider this.

Talley wrote in post #18198732
Looks great... if they only had a few more lens selection

35 F2 IS pancake and some constant aperture zooms... even if they are F4.

I'm really hoping for 40mm plus, can skip IS too...but something faster than f2.8

can you shoot at low ISO with a the 50mm f/1.8/f/1.4 (if you have that) on an adapter.... wide open.. would love to see the results... asking because when i get my MT i will be using with the 40mm lens, 35mm and 50mm EF lenses.

Talley wrote in post #18198099
Eat that dog owners

Well I wouldn't want to eat it, but I m sure my dogs would love to.

Talley wrote in post #18198532
It's bright thats why. Go shoot 6400 F2 and 1/60 and post again...

What do you mean?

thc1979 wrote in post #18199218
What do you mean?

If your outside in the sun taking photos at ISO 6400 1/100 and F11 for a proper exposure they will always look better than indoor/outdoor night time shots that are shot at ISO 6400 1/100 and F2 for a proper exposure

ISO 6400 in alot of light looks good because the bright light hides the noise better

ISO 6400 when you "NEED" it for proper exposure in a lower lit venue will look worse due to dim light.

thc1979 wrote in post #18199218
What do you mean?

he's saying shoot in a dark environment where you NEED 6400, like a dark reception hall or church, etc.

Hrm,

The more I follow this camera, the more I hope Canon releases a 22mm F2 II with a faster autofocus mechanism. Being able to have a field of view I'm used to with my full frame & 35mm would be excellent for an "everything" camera. F2 is just icing on the cake. The heel is the slow AF performance of the 22mm F2 STM regarless of which camera it's on, it's just not slow. The 40 STM & 50 STM focus faster, significantly, even though they're still not that fast, and are noisy. The 18-55 STM focuses really fast and is totally silent. Finding a way to reboot the 22mm F2 to be as fast as the 40/50 STM would be sufficient for me.

The idea of being able to have the M5 be a small camera with a small lens for every day, travel, etc, would be great, and being robust enough to attach bigger lenses and use it as I would normally my other dSLR would just make it a better general purpose camera. I will be very curious how it performs with telephoto lenses for action.

Very best,

They just need to contact Fuji to make their lenses in an EF-M mount lol.... problem solved.

BlakeC wrote in post #18199319
he's saying shoot in a dark environment where you NEED 6400, like a dark reception hall or church, etc.

I see what you mean. I had it in Aperture priority and auto ISO. I'll try it