Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Sep 2016 (Saturday) 16:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Crop 50mm equivilent EF-S lens?

 
STIC
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,627 posts
Gallery: 360 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 985
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
     
Sep 28, 2016 02:44 |  #61
bannedPermanent ban

Cheers for that...


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 28, 2016 09:47 |  #62

mwsilver wrote in post #18142421 (external link)
I've had that same Sigma lens for years and have really enjoyed it, but the design does have some focus issues and it vignettes significantly at f/1.4 and its soft at the edges. The build quality is excellent though. I much prefer my Canon 35mm f/2 IS. The Tstop light transmission of the Sigma is 1.8 to 1.9 depending on the body its mounted on. The Tstop of the Canon is 2.0. So even though the Sigma is technically a whole stop wider than the Canon, the amount of additional light it lets through is almost negligible. The Canon is also much sharper in the center and especially from edge to edge and is a much better lens over all. The Sigma at f/1.4 will provide a shallower DoF even if it doesn't take in any more light than the Canon. I'm not knocking the older Sigma really, but it is easily bested by more current offerings.

I have often thought about selling my 30/1.4 ex or the 35 IS but it kills me to think that I will only be able to get $250 tops for the 30. It would cost around $300 more to buy a new 35 IS. I'll probably do it down the road but not until I have a full frame camera. Hopefully the 6d2 will have the specs I want.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
     
Sep 28, 2016 13:41 |  #63

FEChariot wrote in post #18142701 (external link)
I have often thought about selling my 30/1.4 ex or the 35 IS but it kills me to think that I will only be able to get $250 tops for the 30. It would cost around $300 more to buy a new 35 IS. I'll probably do it down the road but not until I have a full frame camera. Hopefully the 6d2 will have the specs I want.

Believe me, I understand. In the meantime it's not like the Sigma won't get the job done. Many people have been using it happily for years. I've always enjoyed mine and still use it occasionally on my 60D.. It's just that if you can live with f/2 vs f/1.4, the Canon 35 f/2 IS is so much better. And being able to hand hold it at very slow shutter speeds is just the icing on the cake.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dochollidayda
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2077
Joined Aug 2012
     
Sep 28, 2016 16:23 |  #64

mwsilver wrote in post #18142881 (external link)
Believe me, I understand. In the meantime it's not like the Sigma won't get the job done. Many people have been using it happily for years. I've always enjoyed mine and still use it occasionally on my 60D.. It's just that if you can live with f/2 vs f/1.4, the Canon 35 f/2 IS is so much better. And being able to hand hold it at very slow shutter speeds is just the icing on the cake.

Agreed. 35 F2IS, most don't know how good that lens is until they use one. Its a gem of a lens and IS is a killer. Bang on focus and sharp as tack.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,784 views & 9 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
Crop 50mm equivilent EF-S lens?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
737 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.