Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 25 Sep 2016 (Sunday) 10:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help with Indoor Sports settings/lenses/cameras

 
Nebraska
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Omaha
     
Sep 25, 2016 10:14 |  #1

My daughter started playing middle-school volleyball and shooting these games has been humbling! I'm currently using a Canon 7D and 70-200 2.8 IS lens. To get pics that are okay, I've been using ISO over 4000, usually 5000 but that high ISO is really grainy. I also have a Canon Macro 2.0 macro and wondered if that might be a good lens for indoor shooting or maybe a fast 50/85 prime would be better?

I shoot a lot of outdoor sports (mainly BB) as well as wildlife (probably 90% of my shooting) so my 7D has been great and I've been planning on upgrading to the 7D Mark II but am now wondering if it would be better to keep my 7D for the outdoor pursuits and pick up a FF like the 6D for low-light/indoor shooting?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!


Canon 7D | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM| Canon Speedlite 430EX II
For Sale: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pat.kane
Senior Member
Avatar
693 posts
Likes: 138
Joined May 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
     
Sep 25, 2016 10:50 |  #2

I'm not informed enough about the various bodies to make much of a recommendation, other than to state the 7D Mk II anti-flicker feature might be worth considering if you're experiencing color shift in the gyms you're shooting; however, I think a good first step would be to buy an 85mm f/1.8 lens (used prices seem to be around $250-300). Its focus is fast and the range is useful for volleyball.

Good luck as volleyball is one of the more difficult sports to shoot -- fast action (more so as the girls get older), congested court, net grabs focus, usually poor lighting and the clincher is the often not so flattering facial expressions. The girls loved looking at the photos and laughing at each other, but weren't too interested in prints. Thank goodness for moms as I've done OK on sales. It is a fun sport to shoot though.


1Dx Mk II, 5D4 and some L glass (gear list / feedback)
http://MaxPreps.DMVpix​.com (external link)
http://www.DMVpix.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 25, 2016 10:59 |  #3

If you use the search tool, and enter the term "mini-review" under the title, there is a thread about how to get the most from high iso shots on the 7d. It might provide some relief at the higher ISO spectrum on the the 7d.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nebraska
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Omaha
     
Sep 25, 2016 15:19 |  #4

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18139867 (external link)
If you use the search tool, and enter the term "mini-review" under the title, there is a thread about how to get the most from high iso shots on the 7d. It might provide some relief at the higher ISO spectrum on the the 7d.

I'll make sure to check that out....thank you! Will also take a look at the 85mm f1.8.


Canon 7D | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM| Canon Speedlite 430EX II
For Sale: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bseitz234
Senior Member
Avatar
608 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 381
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Maynard, MA, USA
     
Sep 26, 2016 08:11 |  #5

Not sure what f/2 macro you have, as I was pretty sure all of Canon's macro lenses were f/2.8 (except the 180, which is f/3.5). But that extra stop of aperture may help a lot. On a crop sensor, the 50/85 are a pretty good combo for indoor sports; though there's now the sigma 50-100 f/1.8, which sounds like an ideal lens for these situations. I have found that my 70-200 2.8 works well in well-lit gyms, but I'll often prefer the 85 if the light is especially poor.



-Brian
5 EOS bodies, and constantly growing lens selection.
IG @bseitz234

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 26, 2016 10:01 |  #6

Macros aren't the fastest focusing lenses out there, so I would be a bit leary in using a macro lens for sports. I have the 100L and I would never use it for sports, personally.

The big issue here is probably lack of good lighting in a middle school gym, unless they have upgraded lighting to LED, or other sources. You will want to shoot a custom WB to make processing easier too. Otherwise the color shifts will accent the noise.

A 7D2 will be better definitely, but something to consider would be a good 1D4 as well. I shot indoor high school basketball with one, and it worked very well.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Craign
Goldmember
Avatar
1,196 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 77
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Kentucky
     
Sep 27, 2016 21:00 |  #7

Settings often used for indoor sports, hopefully your gym has good enough lighting. ISO 6400, f/2.8 and 1/640 sec. (shoot Raw for better editing)

Great info on the 7D Mark 2 here: 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos https://photography-on-the.net …read.php?t=1397​980&page=1 over 13,000 posts to wade through

My experience with a 7D Mark II
-Noise cleans up great in Lightroom - DO NOT underexpose for best images
-I have shot at ISO 16000 in an emergency with surprisingly good results
-10 fps is a huge benefit for sports
-Anti-flicker is wonderful if the lights cycle
-Various menu settings can be intimidating
-Battery life is shorter than similar cameras


Canon 7D Mark II w/Canon BG-E16 Battery Grip; Canon EOS 50D w/Canon Battery Grip; Canon SL1; Tokina 12mm - 24mm f/4 PRO DX II; Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS; Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS; Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS; Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM; Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS; Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM; Canon Extender EF 1.4x II; Canon Extender EF 2x II; Canon Speedlite 430EX II Flash
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zivnuska
Goldmember
Avatar
3,686 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 653
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
     
Oct 11, 2016 09:02 |  #8

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18140882 (external link)
A 7D2 will be better definitely, but something to consider would be a good 1D4 as well.

Yes, a 1D Mark IV would be an excellent choice.


Phil


www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com/blog (external link) = My Blog
Gear List
www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com (external link)

"It's not tight until you see the color of the irides."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Oct 11, 2016 10:40 |  #9

Nebraska wrote in post #18139800 (external link)
My daughter started playing middle-school volleyball and shooting these games has been humbling! I'm currently using a Canon 7D and 70-200 2.8 IS lens. To get pics that are okay, I've been using ISO over 4000, usually 5000 but that high ISO is really grainy. I also have a Canon Macro 2.0 macro and wondered if that might be a good lens for indoor shooting or maybe a fast 50/85 prime would be better?

I shoot a lot of outdoor sports (mainly BB) as well as wildlife (probably 90% of my shooting) so my 7D has been great and I've been planning on upgrading to the 7D Mark II but am now wondering if it would be better to keep my 7D for the outdoor pursuits and pick up a FF like the 6D for low-light/indoor shooting?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!

Heya,

Stick to your 7D. If you're already buying a 7D2 regardless, that's even better, you'll be using the same ISO values, but they will be a little bit cleaner. Regardless, no matter what you shoot, you'll need to clean up the files. Check out TeamSpeed's guides and his results. That 7D can be shot no problem at ISO 6400 & 12,800 with proper exposure and proper clean up. See his guides again as reference. Also if you move to 7D2, this is still the case, all the same ideas apply. You will still need clean up.

If you want to give yourself more room on ISO, use a faster lens, like an EF 85mm F1.8. That extra 1 & 1/3rd stop of light is faster than your F2.8, and it's sharper wide open. It focuses very, very fast. The field of view is static, compared to a zoom, but the speed is a really great thing and tighter crops look better anyways. Just get low, below their eye level and shoot up, it will look great.

It's not atypical to be shooting at 1/1000s, F2.8, ISO 12,800. With F2, you could be doing 1/1000s, F2, ISO 6400, or you could even go to 1/640s, F1.8, ISO 3200. This is assuming a dark gym. Definitely meter for what you will need and shoot manual to keep it there. Getting exposure right is the first step to using high ISO values.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bimhoff07
Senior Member
Avatar
585 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ohio
     
Dec 15, 2016 20:58 |  #10

Nebraska wrote in post #18139800 (external link)
My daughter started playing middle-school volleyball and shooting these games has been humbling! I'm currently using a Canon 7D and 70-200 2.8 IS lens. To get pics that are okay, I've been using ISO over 4000, usually 5000 but that high ISO is really grainy. I also have a Canon Macro 2.0 macro and wondered if that might be a good lens for indoor shooting or maybe a fast 50/85 prime would be better?

I shoot a lot of outdoor sports (mainly BB) as well as wildlife (probably 90% of my shooting) so my 7D has been great and I've been planning on upgrading to the 7D Mark II but am now wondering if it would be better to keep my 7D for the outdoor pursuits and pick up a FF like the 6D for low-light/indoor shooting?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!

As an owner of both the 7DII and the 6D, I can't recommend the 6D for sports. The focusing system just isn't designed for it. That said, I've used it for both basketball and volleyball and it worked; it's just far from ideal. I'd much more comfortably recommend the 7DII. As mentioned already, the noise cleans up pretty nicely in Lightroom.


Facebook (external link) | Instagram:@bradimhoffp​hotography | www.bradimhoffphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Dec 16, 2016 03:03 |  #11

The basic indoor sports coverage lens is a 70-200mm f/2.8. Unless you want to invest the time and money in using strobes, the only approach is to use high ISOs. Until imaging technology evolves in a few decades, a good technique for the noise-averse is touse noise reduction software. (external link)

http://imagenomic.com/

Nebraska wrote in post #18139800 (external link)
My daughter started playing middle-school volleyball and shooting these games has been humbling! I'm currently using a Canon 7D and 70-200 2.8 IS lens. To get pics that are okay, I've been using ISO over 4000, usually 5000 but that high ISO is really grainy. I also have a Canon Macro 2.0 macro and wondered if that might be a good lens for indoor shooting or maybe a fast 50/85 prime would be better?

I shoot a lot of outdoor sports (mainly BB) as well as wildlife (probably 90% of my shooting) so my 7D has been great and I've been planning on upgrading to the 7D Mark II but am now wondering if it would be better to keep my 7D for the outdoor pursuits and pick up a FF like the 6D for low-light/indoor shooting?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjbsav
Goldmember
Avatar
1,283 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 806
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Savannah, GA
     
Dec 18, 2016 07:27 as a reply to  @ DC Fan's post |  #12

Do you have any before and after examples?


My name is Ben from Savannah, GA
Canon cameras and glass
Facebook - Brengman Photography (external link) My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Dec 18, 2016 11:21 |  #13

Here's an image processed through Imagenomic Noiseware noise reduction software. Original was at ISO 6400.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/12/3/LQ_829906.jpg
Image hosted by forum (829906) © DC Fan [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

bjbsav wrote in post #18216443 (external link)
Do you have any before and after examples?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjbsav
Goldmember
Avatar
1,283 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 806
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Savannah, GA
Post edited over 6 years ago by bjbsav.
     
Dec 18, 2016 12:15 |  #14

I ran this image through it. ISO 4000

I am shooting again tomorrow night. I will try and push the limits of the software.


Before

IMAGE: https://c4.staticflickr.com/1/778/31719267755_84da90f89a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/QjVx​dP  (external link) 121716 1 JHS NHHS (external link) by Ben Brengman (external link), on Flickr

After
IMAGE: https://c8.staticflickr.com/1/333/30915555183_c2c090a975_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/P6Ui​tv  (external link) 121716 1 JHS NHHS 2 (external link) by Ben Brengman (external link), on Flickr

My name is Ben from Savannah, GA
Canon cameras and glass
Facebook - Brengman Photography (external link) My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,779 views & 2 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Help with Indoor Sports settings/lenses/cameras
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
992 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.