Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 25 Sep 2016 (Sunday) 12:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Difference result on or off camera

 
cubatahavana
I still don't see it
Avatar
1,945 posts
Gallery: 262 photos
Likes: 1770
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Sep 25, 2016 12:56 |  #1

I just got a yn685 and I'm getting completely different results when bouncing with the flash on the camera and off camera. I am using ETTL and off camera all works as intended, giving me a good exposure. If I put the flash on the camera hotshoe, it under exposes . Any idea of why? Both shot in Manual mode 1/200 f4 iso 100


Off camera bounced

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/4/LQ_815928.jpg
Image hosted by forum (815928) © cubatahavana [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

On camera bounced

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/4/LQ_815929.jpg
Image hosted by forum (815929) © cubatahavana [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

My Flickr (external link)
My website (external link)
My instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colin ­ Glover
Goldmember
1,376 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southport nr Liverpool United Kingdom
     
Sep 25, 2016 13:31 |  #2

If I didn't know otherwise, I'd've said it didn't fire. What camera mode were they shot in? Green square, P or A semi auto mode? What's it like in manual mode at say 1/32? Or 1/16? If it doesn't fire in manual you have a hotshoe fault. Were you using a trigger or the cameras built in transmitter to fire the off camera flash? If it was the cameras built in transmitter I'd say might be a faulty hotshoe, my 600D is like this. My 70D is fine. If it fires in manual it might be your iso is too low. P mode usually selects a slower shutter to let more light in. Raising ISO will help in P mode, as will EV. It might take a combination of the two. Alternatively, when on camera, you should be able to add positive FEC on the gun itself whilst in TTL mode. Many flashes need this, and I suspect the Yongnuos are no different. The strobist website will help more with this.


Canon EOS 70D, Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 18-55 ii, EF 55-200 USM ii, EF-S 75-300 iii, Tamron 28-80, Sigma 70-210. Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, EF-S 55-250, Raynox Macro adapter, Neewer filters (CPL, UV, FLD & ND4), Fuji HS20 EXR (30X zoom ) & cable release, Yongnuo 560 iii & Luxon 9800A manual flashguns for the Fuji, Hama Star 63 tripod, Hongdek RC-6 remote control, Velbon DF 40 www.point-n-shoot.co.uk website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cubatahavana
THREAD ­ STARTER
I still don't see it
Avatar
1,945 posts
Gallery: 262 photos
Likes: 1770
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Sep 25, 2016 13:38 |  #3

Colin Glover wrote in post #18140021 (external link)
If I didn't know otherwise, I'd've said it didn't fire. What camera mode were they shot in? Green square, P or A semi auto mode? What's it like in manual mode at say 1/32? Or 1/16? If it doesn't fire in manual you have a hotshoe fault. Were you using a trigger or the cameras built in transmitter to fire the off camera flash? If it was the cameras built in transmitter I'd say might be a faulty hotshoe, my 600D is like this. My 70D is fine. If it fires in manual it might be your iso is too low. P mode usually selects a slower shutter to let more light in. Raising ISO will help in P mode, as will EV. It might take a combination of the two. Alternatively, when on camera, you should be able to add positive FEC on the gun itself whilst in TTL mode. Many flashes need this, and I suspect the Yongnuos are no different. The strobist website will help more with this.

Hey, thanks for the answer. Found that this is a common fault on YN flashes. Changed evaluative metering to average solves the issue 100%. Was shooting in manual mode, iso 100 f4 1/200. The ettl was working perfect with the flash attached to the YN622, but underexposing when connected to the camera (only on shots >80-90mm, wide shots were metered correctly). Flash manual mode worked perfect, all the rest worked perfect. So far I am liking this product a lot. Much cheaper than the canon ones


My Flickr (external link)
My website (external link)
My instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colin ­ Glover
Goldmember
1,376 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southport nr Liverpool United Kingdom
     
Sep 25, 2016 14:19 |  #4

Good. Indoors you can up iso to say 800 or at a push 1600 to get better shots. And a softbox diffuser will help. I have a Polaroid one which is cheap as potato chips, and gives a good light.


Canon EOS 70D, Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 18-55 ii, EF 55-200 USM ii, EF-S 75-300 iii, Tamron 28-80, Sigma 70-210. Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, EF-S 55-250, Raynox Macro adapter, Neewer filters (CPL, UV, FLD & ND4), Fuji HS20 EXR (30X zoom ) & cable release, Yongnuo 560 iii & Luxon 9800A manual flashguns for the Fuji, Hama Star 63 tripod, Hongdek RC-6 remote control, Velbon DF 40 www.point-n-shoot.co.uk website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
     
Sep 25, 2016 18:34 |  #5

Interesting as I have a couple of these. So far I've only used them off-camera, paired with my YN 622C-TX. I won't be able to test this until next weekend, but I'll see if I get the same issue on camera.


Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cubatahavana
THREAD ­ STARTER
I still don't see it
Avatar
1,945 posts
Gallery: 262 photos
Likes: 1770
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Sep 25, 2016 18:52 |  #6

frozenframe wrote in post #18140280 (external link)
Interesting as I have a couple of these. So far I've only used them off-camera, paired with my YN 622C-TX. I won't be able to test this until next weekend, but I'll see if I get the same issue on camera.

Off camera worked flawlessly.


My Flickr (external link)
My website (external link)
My instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
     
Sep 25, 2016 18:56 |  #7

cubatahavana wrote in post #18140298 (external link)
Off camera worked flawlessly.

Yes, I did understand that in your OP, and found the same. What I haven't done is use them on camera, so that's what I'm going to test to see if I too have the same problem. Sorry, I should have made my post more clear.


Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by frozenframe. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 01, 2016 23:17 |  #8

Well, I tested one of my YN685s, on-camera ETTL bouncing. I bounced off ceiling, off walls, and well, mine does not have this problem. I was getting proper exposure. I tried in a room lit with single ceiling mounted florescent light, and a dark room, lit only by a dim table-top light.
Couple of images to show ETTL bouncing is working. Don't look at the content, all I could find to shoot this time of the night. My model (wife) is asleep. ;-)a

This is what was lighting the room, ie; ambient.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/10/1/LQ_817012.jpg
Image hosted by forum (817012) © frozenframe [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

ETTL Bouncing off ceiling

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/10/1/LQ_817013.jpg
Image hosted by forum (817013) © frozenframe [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cubatahavana
THREAD ­ STARTER
I still don't see it
Avatar
1,945 posts
Gallery: 262 photos
Likes: 1770
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Oct 02, 2016 10:52 as a reply to  @ frozenframe's post |  #9

And you have it in evaluative?


My Flickr (external link)
My website (external link)
My instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 02, 2016 11:36 |  #10

cubatahavana wrote in post #18139985 (external link)
I just got a yn685 and I'm getting completely different results when bouncing with the flash on the camera and off camera. I am using ETTL and off camera all works as intended, giving me a good exposure. If I put the flash on the camera hotshoe, it under exposes . Any idea of why? Both shot in Manual mode 1/200 f4 iso 100


Off camera bounced
Hosted photo: posted by cubatahavana in
./showthread.php?p=181​39985&i=i89036545
forum: Flash and Studio Lighting


On camera bounced
Hosted photo: posted by cubatahavana in
./showthread.php?p=181​39985&i=i107299137
forum: Flash and Studio Lighting

frozenframe wrote in post #18145863 (external link)
Well, I tested one of my YN685s, on-camera ETTL bouncing. I bounced off ceiling, off walls, and well, mine does not have this problem. I was getting proper exposure. I tried in a room lit with single ceiling mounted florescent light, and a dark room, lit only by a dim table-top light.
Couple of images to show ETTL bouncing is working. Don't look at the content, all I could find to shoot this time of the night. My model (wife) is asleep. ;-)a

This is what was lighting the room, ie; ambient.

Hosted photo: posted by frozenframe in
./showthread.php?p=181​45863&i=i242135649
forum: Flash and Studio Lighting


ETTL Bouncing off ceiling

Hosted photo: posted by frozenframe in
./showthread.php?p=181​45863&i=i262020783
forum: Flash and Studio Lighting

It almost looks as if OFF camera the communication happened via radio, but ON camera there was a faulty connection via the hotfoot causing it not to work.
Was your non-bounce shot with flash On- or Off-camera, frozenframe?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cubatahavana
THREAD ­ STARTER
I still don't see it
Avatar
1,945 posts
Gallery: 262 photos
Likes: 1770
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Post edited over 7 years ago by cubatahavana.
     
Oct 02, 2016 12:53 |  #11

Wilt wrote in post #18146199 (external link)
It almost looks as if OFF camera the communication happened via radio, but ON camera there was a faulty connection via the hotfoot causing it not to work.
Was your non-bounce shot with flash On- or Off-camera, frozenframe?

Would a faulty connection not show in average and evaluative metering? As well it only happens on focal lengths over 80


My Flickr (external link)
My website (external link)
My instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 02, 2016 14:16 |  #12

cubatahavana wrote in post #18146261 (external link)
Would a faulty connection not show in average and evaluative metering? As well it only happens on focal lengths over 80

I have seen a faulty connection cause the flash to stay in 'TTL' mode rather than it detecting the ETTL camera and going instead into 'ETTL' mode. But in that situation the TTL should result in overexposure because the ETTL camera is incapable of measuring light during the exposure and sending the quench ('enough flash output') signal to the TTL flash...the ETTL camera can only send the signal 'give me (predetermined level) of flash output' to the ETTL flash.

The direct flash appears to NOT have 'triggered' the flash at all (dark shot), indicating that the simple Trigger (central pin) and Ground (lateral contact on the foot) were both not properly connected to the sync circuit in the camera. Your shot appears to be a total lack of flash, not an insufficient amount of light from the flash.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cubatahavana
THREAD ­ STARTER
I still don't see it
Avatar
1,945 posts
Gallery: 262 photos
Likes: 1770
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Oct 02, 2016 14:32 |  #13

Wilt wrote in post #18146325 (external link)
I have seen a faulty connection cause the flash to stay in 'TTL' mode rather than it detecting the ETTL camera and going instead into 'ETTL' mode. But in that situation the TTL should result in overexposure because the ETTL camera is incapable of measuring light during the exposure and sending the quench ('enough flash output') signal to the TTL flash...the ETTL camera can only send the signal 'give me (predetermined level) of flash output' to the ETTL flash.

The direct flash appears to NOT have 'triggered' the flash at all (dark shot), indicating that the simple Trigger (central pin) and Ground (lateral contact on the foot) were both not properly connected to the sync circuit in the camera. Your shot appears to be a total lack of flash, not an insufficient amount of light from the flash.

So, Would you recommend to send the flash back? I just don't understand why one mode works and the other doesn't. My 430EXII works perfectly in both modes. Feck it, back it goes to amazon.


My Flickr (external link)
My website (external link)
My instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by frozenframe.
     
Oct 02, 2016 14:33 |  #14

Wilt wrote in post #18146199 (external link)
It almost looks as if OFF camera the communication happened via radio, but ON camera there was a faulty connection via the hotfoot causing it not to work.
Was your non-bounce shot with flash On- or Off-camera, frozenframe?

The non-bounce shot was just actual ambient light, flash shut off. Then I shot with the flash, on-camera, bouncing off the ceiling. I didn't even attempt off-camera because until last night, I've always shot off-camera and had no problems with it that way.


Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
     
Oct 02, 2016 14:37 |  #15

cubatahavana wrote in post #18146156 (external link)
And you have it in evaluative?

I may have left it on spot-metering, that's what I used to get the ambient shot. I just turned the flash on and fired another shot using ETTL on the flash.


Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,574 views & 3 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Difference result on or off camera
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1038 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.