Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 07 Oct 2016 (Friday) 09:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Opinions please on which edit

 
daystar
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
Post edited over 7 years ago by daystar.
     
Oct 07, 2016 09:17 |  #1

Just looking at the temp & tint, color, shadows & contrast mainly; not a composition, candid vs portrait critque.

Which is more appealing?

Thank you.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/10/1/LQ_817872.jpg
Image hosted by forum (817872) © daystar [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/10/1/LQ_817875.jpg
Image hosted by forum (817875) © daystar [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gart
Senior Member
Avatar
476 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 157
Joined Sep 2007
Location: D/FW metro
Post edited over 7 years ago by Gart. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 07, 2016 11:44 |  #2

My opinion only but I like #1 better. I feel the mid-tone/skin-tone has a bit more range to it. Plus there seems to be more difference in color range between the blue of his shirt to the green of the grass as compared to #2.

Shot #2 seems to lose the mid-tone while the darks are darker such as the area to the right side of his head (as we are looking at it) and the lighter areas are brighter (such as the grass).

Gart




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMp
Goldmember
Avatar
3,721 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 1079
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Northeast US
     
Oct 07, 2016 13:15 |  #3

I prefer #2. The colors look slightly more subdued and the shadows look slightly lifted on his face. I tend to prefer less contrast in portraits, so i may be partial. I also think #2 draws my attention to his face more so than #1.


With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group (external link), as an alternate way of maintaining communication with our members and sharing/discussing the hobby.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Oct 07, 2016 13:37 |  #4

I like #1, (or the one without the tree growing out of his shoulder.) ; )


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Oct 07, 2016 13:46 |  #5

#2 for me. Highlights seem less hot/harsh. Color and contrast are much better in #1, though.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Oct 07, 2016 23:28 |  #6

Looks like a tie so far. I'll break it and choose #1. I like the saturated colors and extra contrast in this photo.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Oct 08, 2016 09:53 |  #7

Thanks everyone!

About #1, what can I do to keep the poppy colors but tone down the hot spots on his face. I use Lightroom 99% of the time - if you can tell me in those terms that would be great! :) Would a brush be enough or is there another/better way?


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Snydremark.
     
Oct 08, 2016 09:59 |  #8

daystar wrote in post #18151544 (external link)
Thanks everyone!

About #1, what can I do to keep the poppy colors but tone down the hot spots on his face. I use Lightroom 99% of the time - if you can tell me in those terms that would be great! :) Would a brush be enough or is there another/better way?

Should be easy enough to just play around with pulling the Highlights slider down a bit (not too far or you'll flatten that uot too much) and the Lights/Highlights sliders on the Tone Curve panel to sort that out. The nice thing about Lightroom is that it's non-destructive, so you can do anything you want there and still be able to revert back to the base file if you want.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Oct 08, 2016 10:04 |  #9

Snydremark wrote in post #18151551 (external link)
Should be easy enough to just play around with pulling the Highlights slider down a bit (not too far or you'll flatten that uot too much) and the Lights/Highlights sliders on the Tone Curve panel to sort that out.

Going to go try that now. ;-)a


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Oct 08, 2016 10:15 |  #10

Adjusted a few sliders on #1. Any better?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/10/2/LQ_818030.jpg
Image hosted by forum (818030) © daystar [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Oct 08, 2016 10:31 |  #11

Now it just looks like #2. Try local adjustment on the face only, although I don't see the need.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Oct 08, 2016 10:47 |  #12

rrblint wrote in post #18151569 (external link)
Now it just looks like #2. Try local adjustment on the face only, although I don't see the need.

yeah, it did loose a little "pop" when I did that...I think the local is the better choice. Thanks!


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Oct 08, 2016 10:57 |  #13

daystar wrote in post #18151581 (external link)
yeah, it did loose a little "pop" when I did that...I think the local is the better choice. Thanks!

local's probably better; you could always add a little back with a contrast adjustment, as well. There are a ton of ways to work with those, best to try several out and see what works best for the results you want to see.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,080 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Opinions please on which edit
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
528 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.