When you are looking at a 1:1 photo in lightroom, what size print would be equivalent?
eddieb1 Senior Member 986 posts Likes: 227 Joined Apr 2013 Location: Oregon More info | Oct 12, 2016 13:46 | #1 When you are looking at a 1:1 photo in lightroom, what size print would be equivalent?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KSoze Goldmember More info Post edited over 7 years ago by K Soze. | Oct 12, 2016 13:51 | #2 Well, how many pixels in your image and then what is the dot spacing of your monitor? How many DPI are you going to print at? I try to make art by pushing buttons
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Oct 12, 2016 14:08 | #3 Permanent banMy 22" diagonal monitor is 19" wide. At screen resolution of 1920, we have about 100 pixels per inch. A 6000 x 4000 (24mp) 80D photo would need to be printed 60"x40" to equal your 1:1 view.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanMarchant Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy? 5,634 posts Gallery: 19 photos Likes: 2056 Joined Oct 2011 Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts. More info | Oct 12, 2016 19:47 | #4 eddieb1 wrote in post #18155139 When you are looking at a 1:1 photo in lightroom, what size print would be equivalent? Your question has no meaningful answer because there is no relationship between viewing a digital file on a screen and the size of a physical print, no matter what zoom level you view at. It doesn't matter how many pixels your monitor has per inch of physical screen.... your printer doesn't know or care. Dan Marchant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Oct 12, 2016 20:42 | #5 Permanent banDan Marchant wrote in post #18155437 Your question has no meaningful answer because there is no relationship between viewing a digital file on a screen and the size of a physical print, no matter what zoom level you view at. It doesn't matter how many pixels your monitor has per inch of physical screen.... your printer doesn't know or care. Digital pixels don't equal dots of ink. Physical print size is defined by the number of dots of ink per inch deposited by the printer onto a sheet of paper. This is controlled by the printer driver/software and is unrelated to the number of pixels on your monitor screen. If you have a digital image that is 3,000 pixels wide and you zoom in to 1:1 and then print the image at 1,000 dots per inch the print will be 3" wide. If you print it at 100 dots per inch it will be 30" wide. Great, detailed answer, and true. But the OP is asking what size PRINT would be the same size as 1:1 on his screen. Post #3 provides one answer. The answer for the OP depends on: camera used, and screen size/resolution.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanMarchant Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy? 5,634 posts Gallery: 19 photos Likes: 2056 Joined Oct 2011 Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts. More info | Even so I stand by my answer. Zooming in to 1:1 will tell the OP nothing meaningful about the physical print size of an image and their monitor is irrelevant/meaningless. To explain..... Dan Marchant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. | Oct 13, 2016 00:14 | #7 Dan Marchant wrote in post #18155437 Your question has no meaningful answer because there is no relationship between viewing a digital file on a screen and the size of a physical print, no matter what zoom level you view at. It doesn't matter how many pixels your monitor has per inch of physical screen.... your printer doesn't know or care. ...The only info the OP needs to know to calculate the size of the print is the pixel dimensions of the image file and the DPI of the printer. The monitor is irrelevant and unnecessary.. Since OP failed to mention his screen resolution and horizontal size, we'll have to speak hypothetically...I have a 2560 horizontal resolution screen across 23.25". Let us assume I use a 5DIII, which is 5760 pixels horizontal. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction. 13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info Post edited over 7 years ago by tzalman. (2 edits in all) | Oct 13, 2016 00:36 | #8 This is so easy to see approximately. All you need is a ruler and very minimal math. Photograph the ruler (0-12) so it just fills your frame horizontally. Display it at 1:1 (100%) and scroll to the left side. What number appears on the right side? Let's say 3. So you are looking at a quarter of the image's horizontal dimension. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
birderman Goldmember 1,052 posts Likes: 44 Joined Mar 2011 Location: London, UK More info Post edited over 7 years ago by birderman. | Oct 18, 2016 09:12 | #9 To add to what others have already said: Birderman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 666 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||