Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
Thread started 31 Oct 2016 (Monday) 21:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Looking for an inexpensive 100 f/2?

 
Shawn_BS
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey
     
Oct 31, 2016 21:35 |  #1

http://petapixel.com …ens-canon-costs-just-170/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,786 posts
Gallery: 1179 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8355
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Oct 31, 2016 23:32 |  #2

Man I love Yongnuo... they are really taking advantage of the market and I like it, great competition. I may have to look into this thing. I would imagine it's a loud gear motor focus, which is annoying, but I could ignore it if it's sharp wide open. Would be a fun beater lens.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waylandcool
Senior Member
478 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 17
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Far NW Suburbs of Chicago
     
Nov 01, 2016 11:20 |  #3

If its decently sharp and has good bokeh, I may look into picking this up. It seems like a good bang for your buck lens for people just getting into portraits.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,786 posts
Gallery: 1179 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8355
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 01, 2016 11:25 |  #4

The $170 initial price will likely end up around $120~140 too. That's an outstanding cost if the optics are up to snuff, and historically, the YN 50mm F1.8 & YN 35mm F2 have been optically very good with good bokeh too. The cost savings come from the all-plastic build and the gear/wire (whichever it is) focus motors which are not super fast and are sort of loud. If you can tolerate that these days, they're excellent bargain lenses.

I will have to really see/hear how this one is, because for about $100 more, you can get the Canon 100 F2 used, and have USM speed focus.

Still very interesting.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Nov 01, 2016 19:38 |  #5

I have the EF 100f2, and it may be my favorite lens for what I do. If this is a direct clone with similar performance, then it would be a great buy. I'm curious about the AF though, the fast USM on my lens is one of the reasons I like it so much. And yeah, mine was only $270 used, so this isn't quite the bargain it might seem.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
10,670 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 2358
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Nov 15, 2016 06:34 |  #6

Yongnuo is the new Sigma and Sigma is the new Zeiss


My entire hobby of gear lust has temporarily been shifted into overload. Please be patient while my mind tries to get back onto the road to recovery. We do apologize for any inconvenience this may cause....
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
12,154 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2923
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
     
Dec 11, 2016 22:49 |  #7

.

MalVeauX wrote in post #18172910 (external link)
. . . . . for about $100 more, you can get the Canon 100 F2 used, and have USM speed focus.

Yeah, no kidding! The Canon 100mm f2 is so doggone cheap, it wouldn't seem to make any sense to go with a 3rd party lens.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hqqns
it's really hard to keep up
Avatar
10,946 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 739
Joined Mar 2010
Location: I've seen it. It's rubbish.
     
Dec 11, 2016 23:05 |  #8

Talley wrote in post #18184925 (external link)
Yongnuo is the new Sigma and Sigma is the new Zeiss

Lol, you're funny.


subby

Wife|Son|Daughter|Comp​uters|Cameras|Lenses|A Home|Pans|Spatula|No Frogs

"42"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Myboostedgst
Goldmember
Avatar
1,883 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 622
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
     
Dec 11, 2016 23:07 |  #9

I had the Canon Yongnuo 50mm lens. Wasn't good, AF was terrible and the build quality was horrendous. IQ was ok, not even as good as the 50 STM. Since those two costed so similar, wasn't worth buying the Yongnuo.

I just bought the Yongnuo 35mm F2 for Nikon since there is no 35mm lens for Nikon less than $200 (for full frame). AF is not bad, not as good as my 50mm f1.4, but not too bad in poor light. IQ is actually good, almost as good as my 50 1.4 in my very limited testing and poor light. Build quality is much better than the Canon 50mm version. I actually wanted a very lightweight plastic lens since this is going to be for video work on my glidecam. So far seems to be a great option for Full Frame users who don't want to drop the $400+ on the Nikon 1.8 FF lens.

*One note however. I first mounted the lens and it hunted, simply would not catch focus at all. I was about to film the hunting, so I took the lens off to test my 50 1.4 to make sure that it would catch focus on the same subject. It immediately caught focus, so I swapped back to the Yongnuo lens. Went back to focus on the same subject and it instantly caught focus. I have read about this before. Every so often people have to remount the lens on the body to get it to actually be able to focus. I haven't used the lens much to be able to have it happen again, but as long as it doesn't do it often, it won't bother me for $94.


Andrew | Facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
D750, 24-70, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8G, 70-200 VRII, 300 F2.8 AF
Founder of www.midwestautomotive.​net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D-Jordi
Member
71 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Barcelona. Spain
     
Dec 14, 2016 11:28 |  #10

There seems to be a number of recent eBay listing for the lens now, starting at 199$

Wonder if this one is going to AF in live view...


Cameras: EOS M & M3 --- Lenses: 22mm EF-M, 18-55mm EF-M, FD 50mm f/1.4, EF-S 55-250mm IS II, Sigma 600mm f/8
Disclaimer:The fact that I'm slightly color blind with a crappy monitor and have little or no clue about PP doesn't prevent me from enjoying holding a camera - it just makes it harder to make my photos look normal to you...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,418 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Mar 14, 2017 19:33 |  #11

Talley wrote in post #18184925 (external link)
Yongnuo is the new Sigma and Sigma is the new Zeiss

Exactly, you have to manually focus both Sigma and Zeiss to get in focus shots.  :p


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,469 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4554
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 14, 2017 20:00 |  #12

The Canon lens is amazing!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,254 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 3377
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland OR USA
     
Mar 14, 2017 20:09 |  #13

FEChariot wrote in post #18301169 (external link)
Exactly, you have to manually focus both Sigma and Zeiss to get in focus shots.  :p

Lol...


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,171 views & 6 likes for this thread
Looking for an inexpensive 100 f/2?
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is HealthNskin
857 guests, 419 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.