I took these for my friend, I do not charge just do it for a hobby but would love feedback on how I can get better. Thanks!
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NCzRi1Nov 01, 2016 20:15 | #1 I took these for my friend, I do not charge just do it for a hobby but would love feedback on how I can get better. Thanks! IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NCzRi1Jessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nogo POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban" 9,193 posts Gallery: 17 photos Likes: 685 Joined Dec 2013 Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS) More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Nogo. (2 edits in all) | Nov 01, 2016 20:58 | #2 The first thing I would do is lessen the impact of the background. Get closer to your subject and open up the aperture more. Philip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,909 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16339 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Nov 01, 2016 21:20 | #3 He's so pale and kind of purplish. You might want to change the white balance for a little less blue, to make a healthier look. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 01, 2016 21:29 | #4 First, the child is cute and I would suspect the parents like the shots. One never can tell when the child has had enough and decides that something else is more interesting than posing for you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nogo POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban" 9,193 posts Gallery: 17 photos Likes: 685 Joined Dec 2013 Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS) More info | Oh look, Gart said it better than I did. The brightness of the lake draws the attention away from the kid. That is why I would try to lessen the background. The background would be OK if it was not for that. Philip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,909 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16339 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Nov 01, 2016 22:32 | #6 Nogo wrote in post #18173396 Oh look, Gart said it better than I did. The brightness of the lake draws the attention away from the kid. That is why I would try to lessen the background. The background would be OK if it was not for that. I agree that the water area is too bright. The trouble is, I don't see how blurring it out more would help. Everything that far back is already blurred, and defocusing won't reduce overexposure. You recommended opening the aperture, which would enlarge the overexposed area, if anything. I think your other suggestion, using flash, has a higher chance of success. Even better, perhaps, would be to choose a different spot for the bench, so that the background won't have so much contrast. The sun on the water is hard to deal with. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nogo POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban" 9,193 posts Gallery: 17 photos Likes: 685 Joined Dec 2013 Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS) More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Nogo. | Basically I was responding on my smartphone as a waiter was placing my food on the table. My suggestions may have been a little rushed, I will admit that. But, the point I was trying to make, that I probably did not state well enough, that the background draws the eyes away from the subject matter is valid. My suggestions were just some of the standard things I would try to correct that type of problem. Philip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 02, 2016 08:14 | #8 Thank you all for the responses it helps me a lot. I do not own an off camera flash (it is on my long list of wants). So I am trying to make the best picture I can with the equipment I have now. I do have a reflector, but I couldn't get it to catch enough light. My bad for setting him by that glare in the water..kick myself for doing that. Thanks again for taking the time to help me out! Jessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gungnir Senior Member More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Gungnir. | Nov 03, 2016 02:57 | #9 A reflector or a little fill flash would help with even skin tone and reduce competition with brightness of the background. More light to the eyes would help hold attention along with added highlights to buttons etc. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 03, 2016 08:39 | #10 Warmed them up a little..to much? IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NMnGAAJessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 03, 2016 10:51 | #11 Especially when shooting RAW we can often somewhat compensate for less than ideal lighting by using layers and masking. This quick example could be much improved with the RAW and some care. Image hosted by forum (822782) © AZGeorge [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. George
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 03, 2016 10:57 | #12 AZGeorge wrote in post #18174692 Especially when shooting RAW we can often somewhat compensate for less than ideal lighting by using layers and masking. This quick example could be much improved with the RAW and some care. Much better...like the face lighter...back to work I go Jessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1089 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||