Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 01 Nov 2016 (Tuesday) 20:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Little man

 
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Nov 01, 2016 20:15 |  #1

I took these for my friend, I do not charge just do it for a hobby but would love feedback on how I can get better. Thanks!

IMAGE: https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5508/30606409702_c5e05a17f1_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NCzR​i1  (external link) Untitled (external link) by mamaof2wi (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/6/5574/30090695354_d2a33f97dd_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MR1F​oj  (external link) Untitled (external link) by mamaof2wi (external link), on Flickr

Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nogo
POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban"
9,193 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 685
Joined Dec 2013
Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS)
Post edited over 7 years ago by Nogo. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 01, 2016 20:58 |  #2

The first thing I would do is lessen the impact of the background. Get closer to your subject and open up the aperture more.

You could also use a flash to isolate the background. Set the exposure so the background looks like twilight and then properly expose the kid by the flash.


Philip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,909 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16339
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Nov 01, 2016 21:20 |  #3

He's so pale and kind of purplish. You might want to change the white balance for a little less blue, to make a healthier look.

I don't mind the background showing as it does. (Sorry, Nogo. A matter of taste.)

The second pose has the advantage of getting the baby's arms off his chest. In the first shot, the arms make a dark, shadowy area.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
Progress toward a new forum being developed by POTN members:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1531051

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gart
Senior Member
Avatar
476 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 157
Joined Sep 2007
Location: D/FW metro
     
Nov 01, 2016 21:29 |  #4

First, the child is cute and I would suspect the parents like the shots. One never can tell when the child has had enough and decides that something else is more interesting than posing for you.

You will be getting a variety of responses on what could be done. But as OhLook stated, much is a matter of preference.

Now, since you asked for input, what I would consider:
1. Although I prefer the first shot of the two, the reflection off the water is pretty hot. It somewhat draws my eyes over to it subconsciously. A couple things that could help here are to get lower than you did which would then have the tall grass/weeds block the reflection coming off the water.
2. Have you tried/considered flash? A little fill would help to take the grayness(?) look out of the skin on his face. It wouldn't take much and the picture would look wonderful with the highlights in his hair that the sun is producing.
3. Another option, but takes some practice, is to dial back the ambient light (off of Auto mode) and use flash to properly expose Little Man.

If the idea of using flash outdoors is new to you or you are unfamiliar with the concept, here are a few YouTube videos that explain it in a fairly, easy to understand fashion
Link 1 (external link)
Link 2 (external link)
Link 3 (external link)
Link 4 (external link)

Good luck.

Gart




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nogo
POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban"
9,193 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 685
Joined Dec 2013
Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS)
     
Nov 01, 2016 21:48 as a reply to  @ OhLook's post |  #5

Oh look, Gart said it better than I did. The brightness of the lake draws the attention away from the kid. That is why I would try to lessen the background. The background would be OK if it was not for that.


Philip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,909 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16339
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Nov 01, 2016 22:32 |  #6

Nogo wrote in post #18173396 (external link)
Oh look, Gart said it better than I did. The brightness of the lake draws the attention away from the kid. That is why I would try to lessen the background. The background would be OK if it was not for that.

I agree that the water area is too bright. The trouble is, I don't see how blurring it out more would help. Everything that far back is already blurred, and defocusing won't reduce overexposure. You recommended opening the aperture, which would enlarge the overexposed area, if anything. I think your other suggestion, using flash, has a higher chance of success. Even better, perhaps, would be to choose a different spot for the bench, so that the background won't have so much contrast. The sun on the water is hard to deal with.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
Progress toward a new forum being developed by POTN members:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1531051

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nogo
POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban"
9,193 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 685
Joined Dec 2013
Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS)
Post edited over 7 years ago by Nogo.
     
Nov 02, 2016 02:03 as a reply to  @ OhLook's post |  #7

Basically I was responding on my smartphone as a waiter was placing my food on the table. My suggestions may have been a little rushed, I will admit that. But, the point I was trying to make, that I probably did not state well enough, that the background draws the eyes away from the subject matter is valid. My suggestions were just some of the standard things I would try to correct that type of problem.

Looking at the photos on a decent screen now, I can say the best solution to that problem would probably be to add some fill flash as suggested in the second paragraph. Other than that, without doing a reshoot, simply cropping out some of that over exposed area might help.


Philip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Nov 02, 2016 08:14 |  #8

Thank you all for the responses it helps me a lot. I do not own an off camera flash (it is on my long list of wants). So I am trying to make the best picture I can with the equipment I have now. I do have a reflector, but I couldn't get it to catch enough light. My bad for setting him by that glare in the water..kick myself for doing that. Thanks again for taking the time to help me out!


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gungnir
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Suffolk, England
Post edited over 7 years ago by Gungnir.
     
Nov 03, 2016 02:57 |  #9

A reflector or a little fill flash would help with even skin tone and reduce competition with brightness of the background. More light to the eyes would help hold attention along with added highlights to buttons etc.

That said, you captured the emotion brilliantly and parents wouldn't find their attention drifting.


Steve
'Be the person your dog thinks you are'
#freetommy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Nov 03, 2016 08:39 |  #10

Warmed them up a little..to much?

IMAGE: https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5623/30705887566_eaf83cdfd0_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NMnG​AA  (external link) Untitled (external link) by mamaof2wi (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c5.staticflickr.com/6/5525/30705876516_bea874c7cd_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NMnD​j5  (external link) Untitled (external link) by mamaof2wi (external link), on Flickr

Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
     
Nov 03, 2016 10:51 |  #11

Especially when shooting RAW we can often somewhat compensate for less than ideal lighting by using layers and masking. This quick example could be much improved with the RAW and some care.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/1/LQ_822782.jpg
Image hosted by forum (822782) © AZGeorge [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Nov 03, 2016 10:57 |  #12

AZGeorge wrote in post #18174692 (external link)
Especially when shooting RAW we can often somewhat compensate for less than ideal lighting by using layers and masking. This quick example could be much improved with the RAW and some care.


Hosted photo: posted by AZGeorge in
./showthread.php?p=181​74692&i=i6114819
forum: Critique Corner

Much better...like the face lighter...back to work I go :-P


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,709 views & 6 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Little man
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1089 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.