What is DAM?
Hoover.......Rotter......
Nick5 Goldmember More info | Jul 14, 2017 07:53 | #16 Archibald wrote in post #18195269 What is DAM? Hoover.......Rotter...... Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
williaty Member 115 posts Likes: 87 Joined Feb 2017 More info | Jul 15, 2017 00:36 | #17 I got interested in C1P just because the tethering in LR is so god-awful. C1P is vastly, VASTLY superior for tethering. I have no opinion yet on RAW processing/conversion between the two, but I'll never willingly tether in LR again. C1P's DAM is somewhere between hopeless and non-existent. At this point, my feeling is that I'll end up doing tethered capture in C1P, then importing into LR for DAM, probably doing the RAW conversion in LR/ACR, and then any heavy lifting in in PS. I just can't see using LR to manage the files, going back into C1P for RAW processing/conversion, and then going back to the Adobe side for finishing in PS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Jul 15, 2017 00:47 | #18 C1 has been around since 2002 at least,. it is the most evolved RAW converter around. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise Awaiting the title ferry... More info | Jul 25, 2017 00:16 | #19 It should because they don't give it away. I tried it long ago and really liked it but did not buy it. Had already invested in CS2 or 3 and upgraded until CS6. I also use LR but mostly photoshop for hobby shots. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise Awaiting the title ferry... More info | Jul 25, 2017 00:17 | #20 agedbriar wrote in post #18188210 That reminds me of RawShooter, the raw converter that lasted until the 30D, when Adobe bought it out. It was regarded as the sharpest and most detailing converter of the time, reputedly due to its great demosaicing algorithm. But many users complained about muddy skin rendition, me too. Only after switching to another converter did I find out what was causing the muddy skin tones in RawShooter. It was a sharpening preset that you couldn't zero out with the sharpening slider (that option was hidden in preferences) which only sharpened with black halo that was difficult to notice, but muddied the midtones, especially skin. I had to analyze an image at 400% to finally diagnose the issue. I remember RawShooter. I was just learning about RAW back then. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1138 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||