Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Nov 2016 (Friday) 16:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Post processing - Landscapes vs Portraits

 
dhornick
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 376
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Omaha, NE
     
Nov 18, 2016 16:52 |  #1

So here's a question, about portrait photography post processing. I mainly shoot landscape/sports or action photos. rarely do I shoot people or portraits. However, I'm finding that changing quickly with the arrival of our new (first) grand daughter.

The way I see landscape post processing as compared to portrait post processing it is so different and I have no clue as to how to do the later. I feel my processing is really pretty darn good but when it comes to trying to process a portrait or sit-in or a group of people I just never get it right.

I'm not necessarily talking about the colors, hue or saturation though. It just seems to me when you see a professionally processed portrait it has a softness or even a glow to it.

How is that softness or glow achieved in Lightroom?


Darrell
6D | 16-35mm f/4 L | 8-15mm Fisheye L | 24-105mm f/4L | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 100-400mm f/4.5 5.6L | Speedlights 430EX III, 600EX II RT & ST-E3-RT transmitter.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,708 posts
Gallery: 1101 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8042
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:31 |  #2

Heya,

Well, you can process it up (over expose the skin, smooth it out).

Or you can just use soft light (flash bounce) and get it without any work in post processing.

I tend to not process skin myself. I capture it as it is. It's a memory for me. I will clean up blemishes and stuff on formal portraits. But for the every day spontaneous stuff with family, I want the little flaws. When I shoot skin, I tend to expose up, or to the right, just a bit. It softens skin. I also change white balance as that helps a lot with perception too. That's with natural light. When I use lighting (which is often), I simply expose normally as a big light source naturally will produce a nice, soft glowing skin (bounced flash is just great for this).

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 460
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Nov 18, 2016 18:20 |  #3

I never shoot people without using this...http://xritephoto.com/​colorchecker-passport-photo (external link)

How is that softness or glow achieved in Lightroom?

Check YouTube.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ashleykaryl
Member
204 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Aug 2009
Post edited over 1 year ago by ashleykaryl. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 19, 2016 11:46 |  #4

Many professional images of babies I see online don't actually look terribly good to me. They are just blasting the skin with heavy handed editing using some skin portrait plugin. Moving along...

The ColorChecker PassPort mentioned by Chauncy is like a Swiss army knife for colour and will be useful with your landscapes as well. You could first use it to create an accurate white balance, then use the classic target for camera calibration and between the two parts you'll have technically excellent colour. Finally you can use the creative target as a guided instrument to tweak your output for a particular look.

Follow these steps and the skin tones will look pretty good without artificial softening and it's worth remembering that a baby's skin is already super soft. It doesn't need tricks in Photoshop.

An alternative would be the the ExpoDisc for setting an accurate white balance, however you can tweak this with the included gels to produce warmer skin tones. They used to make one purely for portraits that I have and like it a lot. One advantage of the ExpoDisc is that they can be used in all sorts of weather. It won't be ruined by a chocolate covered finger print either.

Soft reflected lighting or warm diffused daylight, plus accurate exposures should ensure some pretty good results.


X-Rite Coloratti Pro, Phase One Ambassador
Author of Colour Management Pro
https://colourmanageme​ntpro.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,424 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 942
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Nov 19, 2016 12:02 |  #5

Garbage in, garbage out.

It's more about the capture than the processing. Having the right light and using it well. Likewise with the aperture settings on the camera.

I don't do heavy post-processing on portraits, aside from minor retouching to remove some stray hairs or temporal imperfections like a pimple or shaving cut. I leave all the other features untouched, yes, including the wrinkles. What you are is what you get.

With newborns you don't really need any smoothing or lowering of clarity values: their skin is already smooth as silk. Just find yourself a location with an uncluttered background, a large light source such as a north-facing window, and shoot.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,314 views & 4 likes for this thread
Post processing - Landscapes vs Portraits
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is aperture20
683 guests, 390 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.