Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Nov 2016 (Friday) 17:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

shooting a efs lens on a full frame

 
jlstan
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:01 |  #1

Is there any mechanical interference a person would have to worry about if you were to mount a efs lens on a full frame or is it you will just get vignetting? Im wanting to try my 50-100 sigma on my 5D to see what results i get with that combo but I'm worried about damaging the shutter or something.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gart
Senior Member
Avatar
476 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 157
Joined Sep 2007
Location: D/FW metro
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:12 |  #2

I have not tried it myself but I have heard varying responses.

First one is that a Canon EF-S lens will not mount to a full frame body due to mounting tabs or something.

Next, third-party(?) lens such as Sigma doesn't necessarily use different mounts between EF-S and full frame. The lens may be manufactured for EF-S but the mount may be generic to a Canon body without the EF-S restriction.

Last, if it does fit, you take the risk of the mirror hitting the lens as it flips up. Some people have said there is a way to take a bit off the mirror holder and it will work while others said it hasn't been a problem. The EF-S lenses by Canon mount deeper into the camera body than a non EF-S lens.

I may be wrong but this information is what I have heard about the question.

Gart




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:12 |  #3

If the rear element moves, don't use the lens on FF.

I think most third party lenses will be fine.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:18 |  #4

EF-S 18-55 beside EF 70-200 2.8

The extra depth is what messes things up.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/3/LQ_825285.jpg
Image hosted by forum (825285) © Left Handed Brisket [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:23 |  #5

Im thinking its not worth the risk. Thanks for the input




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Nov 18, 2016 17:28 |  #6

jlstan wrote in post #18188354 (external link)
Im thinking its not worth the risk. Thanks for the input

I've mounted third party S lenses on FF with no problem.

Only issue is the few mm of extra depth needed for the way canon designs their EFS lenses. No extra depth? go for it.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Post edited over 6 years ago by DreDaze.
     
Nov 18, 2016 20:04 |  #7

jlstan wrote in post #18188354 (external link)
Im thinking its not worth the risk. Thanks for the input

Third party lenses are EF mounts...so there is zero risk

I know others have mounted the 18-35 f1.8, and it was pretty usable at 35mm... I wonder how usable the 50-100 would be


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 18, 2016 20:07 as a reply to  @ DreDaze's post |  #8

So all sigma specific to crop will also mount to full frame without mechanical damage?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Nov 18, 2016 20:24 |  #9

jlstan wrote in post #18188494 (external link)
So all sigma specific to crop will also mount to full frame without mechanical damage?

yeah...do you have an ef-s lens? or another EF lens...you can look at the mounts and see the difference...all third party mounts are EF...with most EF-s lenses it's just a plastic baffle that physically prevents you from mounting it to a FF camera...you can pull that out and mount it fine though...this is only with metal mount lenses though

when you line up the dot on the lens you line it up with the dot on the camera and not the square right?


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 18, 2016 20:56 |  #10

so could a person shoot a crop specific lens with a extension tube to take care of the vignette issue? This was shot at 100mm f1.8 iso 6400 using the Sigma 50-100. If I could solve the vignette issue it could be a fun lens on a full frame too.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/3/LQ_825307.jpg
Image hosted by forum (825307) © jlstan [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Post edited over 6 years ago by DreDaze.
     
Nov 18, 2016 21:09 as a reply to  @ jlstan's post |  #11

that was shot on your 5D? the vignette doesn't look too terrible to me...there are some instances where it is really black, like you can see the circle, yours isn't like that

the problem with an extension tube is that in makes it hard to focus on anything that is a couple feet away...it's really only good for macro uses

people do mount 1.4X TC on the end of crop specific lenses to mount them to FF without any vignetting...although typically i feel like this is mainly done with wider lenses for landscapes where you don't care about the loss of a stop...something like a sigma 10-20mm with a 1.4X becomes a cheap 14-28mm lens on a FF

your lens would be a 70-140mm f2.5...so even then you'd be a 1/3 of a stop faster than any 70-200mm which could be useful

just the fact you can get 100mm f1.8 on a FF camera is kinda cool though, i don't think there's any other way to achieve that...yeah maybe the corners aren't super sharp...but if you're shooting f1.8 who cares about corner sharpness


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Feb 2012
     
Nov 18, 2016 21:20 |  #12

50mm F1.8 Ive been wanting 1.4x to use with my 150-600 so maybe this is all the more reason to get it so I can see how the 50-100 + 1,4x combo on the 5d would work

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/3/LQ_825312.jpg
Image hosted by forum (825312) © jlstan [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,299 views & 1 like for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
shooting a efs lens on a full frame
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1215 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.