Scrumhalf wrote in post #18188443
I know that the AF system on the 5D4 has been adopted from the 1DX Mark II, but is it identical? Or is it less capable? I was wondering what (if any) capability does one lose/give up when going from the 1DX Mark II to the 5D4. This is primarily for birding.
Would love to hear from anyone who has experience with both bodies.
Thanks!
I made a big change this summer. About 5 years ago, I bought a 300 2.8 II and I used it all the time. After the 100-400 II came out, the 300 only got used a few times per year. So I took the 300 and my 7D2 (along with a couple other items) to my local camera store and traded the stuff plus $900 for a 1DX2. I was going to get a refurbished 6D for my 2nd body, but my wife told me to get the 5D4 instead (I love my wife!). So I've had the 1DX2 and 5D4 for a few months.
Coming from the 7D2, the 7 fps of the 5D4 seems a bit slow. The 14 fps of the 1DX2 is awesome! I don't notice any difference in the focusing of the 5D4 vs the 1DX2. However, on a very subjective basis, I tend to like the images from the 1DX2 a little better than the 5D4. Not sure why; maybe slightly richer colors, better contrast, better detail, I'm just not sure. In any case, my usage has evolved to the 1DX2 + 100-400 II for birds, wildlife, airshows, and pseudo-macro. The 5D4 is portraits, landscapes, cityscapes, and just general walking around.
I never had a 5D3, so I can't make a comparison there. I do enjoy both of these bodies much more than the 70D and 7D2 that they replaced. I find I've lost a little reach by not having a crop body, but I'm fine with that. I'm getting the best image quality I've ever had, and I appreciate that.
If I had to choose one or the other, I would pick the 1DX2 mostly because of the 14 fps for birds and airshows. But if I only had the 5D4, I'd still be a very happy camper. 