Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 23 Nov 2016 (Wednesday) 12:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My first portrait session

 
GumbyBN
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 23, 2016 12:07 |  #1

Hey guys, I'm new to portrait photography so I asked my friend if I could take some pictures of her to practice. I got a bit that I liked, but I wanted to get some constructive criticism on them so I can get better. So here are a few of my favorites. I used minimal editing, just used basic adjustments in Lightroom.

Thanks in advance for replies! Let me know what you think or would have done different. :-)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/4/LQ_826001.jpg
Image hosted by forum (826001) © GumbyBN [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/4/LQ_826002.jpg
Image hosted by forum (826002) © GumbyBN [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 6 years ago by Alveric.
     
Nov 23, 2016 13:52 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Try centering the subject to avoid the bad framing you got in #2.

Also, try getting your subjects farther away from the background, especially if your lens isn't capable of very wide apertures.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonofjesse
Senior Member
Avatar
692 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
Nov 23, 2016 16:56 |  #3

Welcome and great start to this wonderful journey. I like the lighting in the first one, the 2nd one seems a hair bit dark to me.

I would get a used 50mm 1.8 for portaits and start shooting.

Good luck.


FeedBack
Feedback 2
Feedback 3
Feedback 4
Feedback 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EightEleven
Car enthusiast and an all around nice guy
1,676 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 143
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Northeast Georgia
     
Nov 23, 2016 18:52 |  #4

I second the 50mm.. You can order them for around $125, get the STM version.. If your town is large enough the local Best Buy might have one in stock..
https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …02_ef_50mm_f_1_​8_stm.html (external link)

http://www.bestbuy.com …k/7963106.p?sku​Id=7963106 (external link)


Ron Snarski
flickr (external link)
C&C always welcome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
98kellrs
Senior Member
Avatar
841 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 710
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Perth, Australia
Post edited over 6 years ago by 98kellrs.
     
Nov 23, 2016 18:58 |  #5

A new lens won't help with composition or exposure issues. Keep using the 25-135mm until you figure out which focal length you naturally gravitate towards and start to develop your own style. Some people tend towards 35mm, others 50mm, others 85mm and others 135mm. Find which one (or two) you enjoy shooting at most, and work from there with lens selections.

Watch out for cropped off fingers and awkwardly cropped limbs as seen in #2.

As Alveric said, to make your subject stand out, you need to isolate them from the background. This is typically done by adding distance between the subject and whatever is behind them. Try some shots along a footpath, or across an open park, while I'm sure the lake behind her in #2 looked nice in person, in a photograph it's a busy distraction.


Ryan
Nikon D800
Fujifilm X-T1
RSK Photography Facebook - Automotive Photography page (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 6 years ago by Alveric.
     
Nov 23, 2016 23:30 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

I'm with 98kellrs: gear is not the answer here. Besides, there's no such a thing as a 'portrait lens': all lenses are portrait lenses.

Whilst the zoom lens might not be the best for 'creamy bokeh' :rolleyes: it does give the flexibility to try several variants and different views of the same subject, without the hassle of swapping lenses. One can always (for the most part) place the subject several fathoms away from the background to obtain a pleasant out-of-focus blur.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,579 posts
Likes: 993
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Nov 23, 2016 23:53 |  #7

Good start. Now, back up, shoot at 135mm and study the difference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tyguy
Senior Member
Avatar
510 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 290
Joined Sep 2014
Location: Calgary, Canada
     
Nov 24, 2016 15:07 |  #8

The 50mm would be great if you have some extra cash burning a hole... Your current lens is just fine though (as tex mentioned, try it at 135mm).

The first one is slightly green (maybe the second one as well) and both are a bit underexposed. Fix that in Lightroom and they're pretty good!


-Tyler
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
1,997 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 1327
Joined Nov 2012
Post edited over 6 years ago by DagoImaging. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 24, 2016 15:25 |  #9

I agree w/ most of the comments above.

I'd say work on them in post processing to lighten the subject as she's under-exposed in comparison to the background.
Framing does need work on these. I'd crop the second into a landscape.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/4/LQ_826155.jpg
Image hosted by forum (826155) © DagoImaging [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GumbyBN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 24, 2016 17:50 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #10

Okay cool, cropping and positions for the subject are something that I need to learn. I just let her pose herself during the shoot since I wasn't sure of any good poses.

I do own a 50mm f/1.8 that I didn't even think about using that could go lower than what was shot, but when I use this lens I will try that. Should I get her far away from the foreground as well?

Thanks for your input! I appreciated it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GumbyBN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 24, 2016 17:56 as a reply to  @ sonofjesse's post |  #11

Thank you, I usually shoot cars or landscapes so it will be nice to shoot some people and see where that goes. I did like the lighting on the first as well, and after I posted I realized that the second was darker. I found that I struggled with consistency on exposures and white balance throughout the set I picked out, so I'll work on that.

I do own one, but totally spaced using it because I was more focused on composition of the shots. I will try that next time and try out some of the other lenses so I can see how they perform.

Thank you, I appreciate your input!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GumbyBN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 24, 2016 18:01 as a reply to  @ EightEleven's post |  #12

I do have one, but I'm not sure if I have the STM version. It's at home, so I won't be able to check if I do. What is the difference if it doesn't?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GumbyBN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 24, 2016 18:06 as a reply to  @ 98kellrs's post |  #13

I do agree the gear won't help, but it doesn't help that I want to buy more and more. :lol: I will look through the shots and see what's the most common. I don't think I shot any at 135mm though, I did tend to gravitate towards the smaller distances thinking back.

I didn't even think about those, I will check those out.

Okay, that makes sense. The goal is to create depth, correct? It did look nice, but I see now that it is a distraction a bit.

Thank you for your advice!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GumbyBN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 24, 2016 18:12 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #14

I do enjoy the zoom lens since most the time when I'm shooting people it is my nephew and he is constantly moving. I will try the larger distances to see how they turn out, I did have one that I liked that was distant. I haven't really tried bokeh but I am intrigued!

Thanks for your advice! This was the one that I liked that was a larger distance away.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/11/4/LQ_826174.jpg
Image hosted by forum (826174) © GumbyBN [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GumbyBN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
17 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Taylorsville, Utah, United States
     
Nov 24, 2016 18:13 as a reply to  @ texkam's post |  #15

I will definitely try that. I do have a 100mm-300mm that I will throw on one day that will make me focus on those larger distances.

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,014 views & 5 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
My first portrait session
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1074 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.