Does anyone have photo examples using the135mmL with the 5D iv they could post. I'm on the fence with this lens and the70-200 mark ii. Also would like to know how the135 performs with the body combo. I shoot a lot with the100mm L and love it.
Nov 24, 2016 13:13 | #1 Does anyone have photo examples using the135mmL with the 5D iv they could post. I'm on the fence with this lens and the70-200 mark ii. Also would like to know how the135 performs with the body combo. I shoot a lot with the100mm L and love it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | Nov 24, 2016 13:18 | #2 I don't have a 5D IV, but a 5D III. I shoot 135 and the 70-200 mkII. The both work incredibly well on 5D III. I'm not sure why the both wouldn't work better on the 5D IV, considering the better AF of that body. The 135 is lightning fast, very, very sharp, renders great color, and has very nice OOF blur. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PJJ205 Senior Member 348 posts Likes: 446 Joined Aug 2015 More info | Nov 24, 2016 17:03 | #3 I have both the 135 and 70-200 lenses and a 5DIV. I'd go with the 70-200 2.8 II. By far my favorite lens! Versatile with the zoom capability, super sharp, colors are amazing, IS is handy... I'd definitely choose that 70-200 over the prime 135, but that's just my opinion.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info Post edited over 6 years ago by windpig. | Nov 24, 2016 17:11 | #4 The 70-200 is a beast when it comes to weight. Certainly more versatile. What are you planning on shooting? Is there a noticeable difference between 2.0 and 2.8 regarding OOF areas (subject separation)? Yes. Maybe consider selling or swapping the 100L for the 135. I've also got the 100L. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 24, 2016 17:22 | #5 I also shoot with both, and they're both awesome on the 5D4. The 135L has it's own unique look when shot at f/2, no doubt. The zoom is amazing in its own right, so very versatile. Image hosted by forum (826169) © MatthewK [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (826170) © MatthewK [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 26, 2016 11:18 | #6 Looking for a shot at135mm at 2.8 using the 70-200 mark ii and also the same shot using the 135mmL prime at f2. Same spot same subject. Anyone have the time and setup to do this for me? So one the fence between the two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 27, 2016 06:12 | #7 In that type of comparison, I suspect the only difference will be in the bokeh, you gain a bit more oof look with the prime but lose image stabilization and zoom flexibility. You obviously save some cash though. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1215 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||