Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 28 Nov 2016 (Monday) 06:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

shooting in Manual mode

 
sanil
Senior Member
Avatar
658 posts
Likes: 1561
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Hyderabad - Deccan
     
Nov 28, 2016 06:51 |  #1

I shoot exclusively in Aperture mode. I feel that shooting in manual mode may open up some possibilities. How do i Start doing it ? Any suggestions / Methodologies?

Thank you

Anil


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/anilsarvepalli​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Nov 28, 2016 09:52 |  #2

You shoot a lot of birds, so I assume that you don't want to manual focus, but use M for exposure? I use my hand as the known target + a 4/3 compensation in the viewfinder:
Need an exposure crutch?

And for those who might ask "Why?": Post #47


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Nov 28, 2016 10:00 |  #3

sanil wrote in post #18196779 (external link)
I shoot exclusively in Aperture mode. I feel that shooting in manual mode may open up some possibilities. How do i Start doing it ? Any suggestions / Methodologies?

Thank you

Anil

Many of us shoot M mode with auto ISO. It gives full control over aperture and shutter speed. ISO is usually a less critical parameter with today's excellent sensors, plus there is noise reduction in post-processing. Give it a try.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 488
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
Post edited over 6 years ago by Larry Johnson. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 28, 2016 10:26 |  #4

Good choice. I never understood why people shoot in AP mode.
You first need to understand how to "meter" your camera. I like to refer to it as calibrating. It just makes more sense to me.

You don't want to blow the highlights (white feathers) on your subject, so meter off of something white in the same light as your subject, and open up 1 to 1-2/3 stops on the meter. Use Spot metering mode.

Turn on your highlight alerts. If you see blinkies, then stop down a little either with shutter, aperture or ISO. Then ignore your meter until the light changes. Shoot when your subject is in the light, not in the shadows. For more in depth info, google " how to calibrate camera highlight alerts" or something similar.

Watch your histogram. Overexpose as much as you can without allowing it to touch the right side of the histogram.

Don't worry about the exposure of the background. The goal is to expose your subject to your liking.

Read chapter 6 for a better explanation. http://www.digitalbird​photography.com/conten​ts.html (external link)

Also learn about metering using an 18% gray card.

Auto ISO is NOT manual mode. The camera will still make decisions for you in this mode.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 28, 2016 10:52 |  #5

sanil wrote in post #18196779 (external link)
I shoot exclusively in Aperture mode. I feel that shooting in manual mode may open up some possibilities. How do i Start doing it ? Any suggestions / Methodologies?

Thank you

Anil

Heya,

It requires you to control your meter regardless of modality selected and target some values that stop motion if necessary, and expose enough of the subject to work with in post without over-exposing and blowing out highlights (and thus losing data, you can recover shadow stuff easier and cleaner than trying to deal with totally lost data due to blown highlights). I like to spot meter in manual and I look for the darkest and brightest things I can to get an idea of what kind of range I'm dealing with. White is the ideal for the brightest thing to meter, or near white so that you don't over-expose to the point of data loss. Then look for the darkest things you may expose for. You could expose just for highlights. But you can also look at the light and dark metering points and target something between them, but that requires a good sensor with high dynamic range. When in doubt, simply expose up as much as you can without blowing highlights, and you'll have a good workable RAW file to process.

I target a shutter speed for motion stopping when I'm doing in-flight. I like shutters between 1/1000s and 1/2000s. I adjust aperture & ISO based on those needs. When in-flight, I stop down my aperture a bit to get better depth of field and sharpness. I compensate my shutter & aperture with ISO. I expose my histogram to the right but stop where highlights blow out. When I'm shooting something stationary, I open my shutter more and relax ISO and allow my shutter to fall slower and utilize mount & image stabilization to get data that way for a cleaner image (as this is often for me in lower light such as under canopy).

I find that I can use aperture priority or manual back and forth though. I use manual when the situation is too difficult even for a spot meter, such as shooting into a bright sky with a dark bird, or shooting a bright bird against a dark background. When the light is more diffuse and the bird and background are closer in exposure values, AP can handle it fine for me (exposing to the right still, as I dial in a little +EC and shoot RAW for recovery).

Regardless of the approach, in full manual, you have to watch the changing light conditions, clouds, etc. If you set it once and just shoot all over, you will get all kinds of mixed results. It's a dedicated way to approach things without automation to get the exposure close to what you want. If you're frantically moving from one place to another and firing off shots, semi-automation is likely more helpful (like AP) if you control your meter and understand what its doing so that you can influence the semi-automation.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sanil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
658 posts
Likes: 1561
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Hyderabad - Deccan
     
Nov 30, 2016 10:49 |  #6

Shall try shooting in manual mode and post some pictures ... later this week.

One of the techniques i read else where and tried..

to take metering of grass in the same light as the bird .. null the meter .. to begin with...

then if the bird is white ... under expose by couple of stops and if the bird is dark over expose by couple of stops.. ..

if the light become brighter increase the no of stops ...

i was shooting birds flying on the water (which is lit bright with sun) and had miserable results.. could nt figure out why?


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/anilsarvepalli​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:14 |  #7

sanil wrote in post #18199145 (external link)
Shall try shooting in manual mode and post some pictures ... later this week.

One of the techniques i read else where and tried..

to take metering of grass in the same light as the bird .. null the meter .. to begin with...

then if the bird is white ... under expose by couple of stops and if the bird is dark over expose by couple of stops.. ..

if the light become brighter increase the no of stops ...

i was shooting birds flying on the water (which is lit bright with sun) and had miserable results.. could nt figure out why?

Just watch for blinkies. If there are blinkies, then reduce the exposure.

Following rules of thumb might work sometimes, but they fail if they result in blinkies.

Sometimes there is not enough time to adjust the exposure, so you just do what you can.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
Post edited over 6 years ago by John Sheehy.
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:18 |  #8

sanil wrote in post #18196779 (external link)
I shoot exclusively in Aperture mode. I feel that shooting in manual mode may open up some possibilities. How do i Start doing it ? Any suggestions / Methodologies?

Auto-ISO in M mode with HTP (Highlight Tone Priority) enabled is my go-to. HTP gives a stop of headroom for when you don't have time to perfect the embedded JPEG exposure, and does not give horrific shadow results with newer cameras with lower banding noise when HTP causes very low ISOs, especially newer cameras with the off-sensor ADC.

Keep your Av value wide open, unless you need DOF or your lens is sharpest stopped down a little; adjust shutter speed a little bit depending on lighting, with the knowledge of how the lighting drives the ISO at that shutter speed, to help decide with trade-offs. Even though my ISO might vary from 200 to 16,000 (7D2 ISO range for HTP), my aperture generally only varies by a stop or so and is almost always wide-open, and shutter speed is set for lighting and subject activity, but generally over a much smaller range than ISO. With a relatively calm bird in shade, I might drop to take a few shots at 1/100 or sometimes slower. Out in the sun, and with BIFs, shutter speed can be 1/800 to 1/2000.

You have to be careful about leaving the camera set to slow shutter speeds from the shade when you move to bright areas, though, as that can cause blown ISO 200 images. Unfortunately, the cameras don't seem to have a shutter speed escape option to raise the shutter speed when it would cause over-exposure. Eventually, we should have enough flexibility in settings that we can pretty much define what the Av, Tv, and ISO settings are for a range of light levels, and make the camera do what we would do if we had the time to do it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sanil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
658 posts
Likes: 1561
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Hyderabad - Deccan
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:19 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #9

no blinkies were there during that shooot.. while I was photographing .. in manual mode..


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/anilsarvepalli​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 488
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:24 as a reply to  @ sanil's post |  #10

There are two methods for metering; 1. metering your white subject, 2. metering off of something neutral gray (i.e. grass) and then adjusting up or down depending whether your subject is light or dark. The "ah ha" moment for me regarding metering and learning how to shoot in manual mode was learning that, when in any auto mode, the camera will make all of your images neutral gray (or approx. 18% gray). Read Sandpiper's explanation in this thread; https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1371483

and here's another that may help. https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17826397

Become an expert at metering your camera, then you can think about shooting in other modes. You'll be better off for it.
Also, if you push the histogram to the right as I've suggested in another thread, remeber that you'll have to shift the exposure back in post processing, so you'll need Lightroom or other editing software to allow you to do so.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:26 |  #11

John Sheehy wrote in post #18199174 (external link)
Auto-ISO in M mode with HTP enabled is my go-to. HTP gives a stop of headroom for when you don't have time to perfect the embedded JPEG exposure, and does not give horrific shadow results with newer cameras with lower banding noise when HTP causes very low ISOs, especially newer cameras with the off-sensor ADC.

Keep your Av value wide open, unless you need DOF or your lens is sharpest stopped down a little; adjust shutter speed a little bit depending on lighting, with the knowledge of how the lighting drives the ISO at that shutter speed, to help decide with trade-offs. Even though my ISO might vary from 200 to 16,000 (7D2 ISO range for HTP), my aperture generally only varies by a stop or so and is almost always wide-open, and shutter speed is set for lighting and subject activity, but generally over a much smaller range than ISO. With a relatively calm bird in shade, I might drop to take a few shots at 1/100 or sometimes slower. Out in the sun, and with BIFs, shutter speed can be 1/800 to 1/2000.

You have to be careful about leaving the camera set to slow shutter speeds from the shade when you move to bright areas, though, as that can cause blown ISO 200 images. Unfortunately, the cameras don't seem to have a shutter speed escape option to raise the shutter speed when it would cause over-exposure. Eventually, we should have enough flexibility in settings that we can pretty much define what the Av, Tv, and ISO settings are for a range of light levels, and make the camera do what we would do if we had the time to do it.

I'm sure everybody knows what HTP means...


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:33 |  #12

Larry Johnson wrote in post #18196903 (external link)
Auto ISO is NOT manual mode. The camera will still make decisions for you in this mode.

I disagree. Auto-ISO with manual Av and manual Tv is as "Manual" as it gets, because you are never compromising those two manual setting to adjust relative "exposure". Aperture determines real photographic parameters, and the exposure time does, too. "Exposure" and "ISO" are semantic/logistic nuisances that interfere with true manual photography, which is what you would have if you had a camera with no variable "gain" per se; just a photon-counting sensor and Av and Tv controls, where there is only absolute exposure, and no relative under- or over-exposure. No highlight clipping possible, and no low exposure issues other than shot noise, the texture of captured light.

Choosing photographically-relevant parameters, manually, is what makes manual manual; not circumventing current technological capture issues.

I've never understood the common desire to reduce complex things to simple things, and create innuendo out of thin air in the process. Manually setting the f-number or physical aperture is manual. Setting the shutter speed manually is manual. Setting the ISO manually is also manual, but it is not about photography, per se; it is about limitations of the camera's capture ability.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:58 |  #13

John Sheehy wrote in post #18199186 (external link)
I disagree. Auto-ISO with manual Av and manual Tv is as "Manual" as it gets, because you are never compromising those two manual setting to adjust relative "exposure"...

I totally disagree. Anytime the camera chooses to adjust the exposure, it's not what we mean when we say "Manual exposure".


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 30, 2016 11:58 |  #14

Archibald wrote in post #18199182 (external link)
I'm sure everybody knows what HTP means...

I edited my post to spell out HTP (Highlight Tone Priority).

HTP is something that people avoid, and that is partly my fault, as I was one of the first people warning against using it in photography forums and Usenet when the feature was first introduced. HTP works by the camera metering for ISO 200, calling it 200, but using ISO 100 RAW digitization and RAW levels. It is supposed to be understood by the converter that the normal whitepoint and graypoints are one stop lower. IOW, if white were 8000 RAW number above black without HTP, it is 4000 with HTP. Some converters will ignore this, and just render the default conversion a stop too dark.

The reason it can be problematic is that cameras with lots of shadow banding noise at base ISO or very low ISOs, it can cause banding to be visible in "normal" conversions, because it is a one-stop under-exposure. It is even more problematic when f-numbers are low, below 2.8 for larger pixels and about 2.0 for smaller pixels, because then there is hidden under-exposure, and ISOs like 125 are under-exposed 1/3 stop more, so ISO 250 with HTP and an f/1.0 lens can really bring up banding noise.

With slower telephoto lenses f/2.8 and greater, higher ISOs, and camera lacking in banding noise, and especially ones with off-sensor ADCs, this just isn't an issue. It does not increase noise except in the deepest shadows of the lowest ISOs, and with more recent Canons, that extra noise generally falls outside the realm of concern. HTP give slightly smaller RAW files, as well, as they have more high-order bits that are mostly zeros in the RAW files. One downside is that the ISO won't go above a certain level with HTP, which is a very poor design decision on Canon's part, because there is no penalty to HTP at the highest ISOs, at all. HTP should go one stop higher, not a couple stops lower, than non-HTP ISOs.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 30, 2016 12:04 |  #15

PhotosGuy wrote in post #18199212 (external link)
I totally disagree. Anytime the camera chooses to adjust the exposure, it's not what we mean when we say "Manual exposure".

Exposure on the sensor is not changed by the ISO setting in M mode. The ISO setting only changes the absolute clipping level, and the amount of post-gain noise added to the signal in readout. These are not real photographic parameters; they are technological problems forced onto manual-TV&Av photography.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,000 views & 27 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 14 members.
shooting in Manual mode
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1674 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.