Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Mar 2006 (Monday) 12:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24-70L, Focus Ring Slack

 
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Mar 13, 2006 12:39 |  #1

So I picked up a spanky new 24-70 last week. Unfortunately, the focus ring has a little slack in it. That is, if you turn it in one direction, say - and then the other... There's a slight "dead zone" of maybe 1mm+ before it truly catches and continues focusing. In other words the focus ring seems a little loose.

I'm thinking I should either return it for an exchange or get it fixed under warranty.

The 16-35 doesn't have this. Am I being too picky? I'm just worried it'll loosen up more over time.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Mar 13, 2006 16:16 |  #2

Plenty of people have complained of that, lately. I say, if it's barely 1mm, that's nothing to be concerned over. I honestly don't remember if any of mine did that.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
THREAD ­ STARTER
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Mar 13, 2006 16:24 |  #3

Really? Hmm. It's about 1mm, maybe a touch more. My biggest concern was it getting worse over time. But I guess I can keep an eye on it, since it has a USA warranty. Plus, it's not like I manual focus much, if at all.

Just wasn't sure if I should exchange it while I still can or send it in...

Thanks for the feedback, Ronald.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Mar 13, 2006 16:33 as a reply to  @ Double Negative's post |  #4

Double Negative wrote:
Really? Hmm. It's about 1mm, maybe a touch more. My biggest concern was it getting worse over time. But I guess I can keep an eye on it, since it has a USA warranty. Plus, it's not like I manual focus much, if at all.

Just wasn't sure if I should exchange it while I still can or send it in...

Thanks for the feedback, Ronald.

if it's under warranty i'd send it back.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Mar 13, 2006 17:29 |  #5

Better yet, before surrendering your lens for half a lifetime, why not find a local store that has one in stock and try it out? See if it has the same problem. Even better yet, wait for more people to answer. You've got a year, you know! :lol:


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pjsun
Member
Avatar
90 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Mar 13, 2006 23:29 |  #6

ya mine has a little slack too, about 1mm but it's not really bothering me though.........


Canon 5D + BG-E4
100mm - 400mm F4.5 -5.6L IS USM
[COLOR=black]24mm - 70mm F2.8L USM
50 mm F2.5 Compact Macro + LifeSize Converter
580 EX
Pelican 1500 HardCase
Canon 300D
Tamaron XR DI 28mm - 300mm F3.5-6.3

I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Mar 14, 2006 01:46 |  #7

You could call it a 'feature' even :lol: :lol: that 1mm gives you time to compose :p


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,826 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 5978
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Mar 14, 2006 02:29 |  #8

*reaches for the bag* - looks like less than 1mm on mine, feels about the same on the zoom ring. Rarely likely to use manual focus on this lens though...


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
THREAD ­ STARTER
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Mar 14, 2006 09:38 |  #9

Yeah, I double-checked and it's 1mm tops. It's just a little bit of slack.

That was my thinking too - it's not like I'll be manual focusing much, if ever. Like you said Ronald, I've got a year... :)


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Specialhawk
Member
239 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Mar 14, 2006 09:41 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

ive never used this lens but this is what happened to my 70-200 a few months ago, the problem got worse and it is now being repaiered as the af was bad.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,750 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
24-70L, Focus Ring Slack
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1314 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.