Use it all the time on FF. I just wish it were a 43,3mm instead of a 40mm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_lens
The 43.3 is referring to the diagonal image size cast onto the 35mm film format, not a focal length.
Benitoite Goldmember More info | Feb 01, 2017 03:15 | #151 anscochrome wrote in post #18204559 Use it all the time on FF. I just wish it were a 43,3mm instead of a 40mm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_lens The 43.3 is referring to the diagonal image size cast onto the 35mm film format, not a focal length.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shane_c Senior Member 726 posts Likes: 85 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Halifax, NS, Canada More info | Mar 26, 2017 06:19 | #152 I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had. Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apricane Shooting the breeze More info | Mar 26, 2017 07:52 | #153 shane_c wrote in post #18311096 I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had. Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it. Mine's buttery smooth and almost entirely silent. Definitely not anything that I'd describe as 'gritty' or 'noisy'. Apricane flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DaviSto ... sorry. I got carried away! More info Post edited over 6 years ago by DaviSto. (2 edits in all) | Mar 26, 2017 08:03 | #154 shane_c wrote in post #18311096 I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had. Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it. Mine is quite smooth with just a little motor noise. Does the focus ring still feel gritty when the camera is switched off (i.e. when its just turning aimlessly and not moving any of the elements)? David.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shane_c Senior Member 726 posts Likes: 85 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Halifax, NS, Canada More info Post edited over 6 years ago by shane_c. | Yes, it's the same whether the camera is on or off. I bought it used from a camera store. I'll probably bring it in to compare to a new one, and exchange for another used one if it's drastically different. Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DaviSto ... sorry. I got carried away! More info | Mar 26, 2017 08:17 | #156 shane_c wrote in post #18311152 Yes, it's the same whether the camera is on or off. I bought it used from a camera store. I'll probably bring it in to compare to a new one, and exchange for another used one if it's drastically different. I'm no expert but I think that that is probably relatively good news ... it's just the ring mechanism itself that's a bit gritty not the actual lens internals. But no harm in seeing if you can get a better one. David.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shane_c Senior Member 726 posts Likes: 85 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Halifax, NS, Canada More info | That's what I'm thinking too. I watched some videos and the AF noise is the same as what I'm hearing online and it's quick and accurate. It's just the focus ring the feels a bit gritty when I turn it. Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2017 08:47 | #158 sold it soon after getting 24-70ii over a year ago. Do not miss it for a second. IQ is not even close, 24-70ii gives way better color and flexibility which is more important than just weight to me. 40mm is sharp but and not much more than that - can't do much with raw files (colors fall apart quickly when pushed).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2017 11:59 | #159 aquaforester wrote in post #18260595 Accessory question if I can. If you use a screw in lens hood with these pancakes can you still put a lens cap on. Yes. There is a no name soft plastic collapsable one that I use. It folds right down to make the lens no bigger while it is on. Highly recommended. Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2017 12:02 | #160 shane_c wrote in post #18311096 I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had. Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it. When in AF mode, it should turn with no effect or sound. In MF mode, it is similar to when using AF - ie you can hear the focus motor - thus it is not a good lens for video - but there shouldn't be a grinding. Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2017 20:49 | #161 I've had 3 copies now. Bought one before each vacation just to have a lighter lens... A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2017 21:33 | #162 Talley wrote in post #18312790 I've had 3 copies now. Bought one before each vacation just to have a lighter lens... ...and then never used it on the vacation. Won't make that mistake again. you need to make peace with F2.8 and use it! Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Talley Talley Whacker More info Post edited over 6 years ago by Talley. | Mar 27, 2017 21:46 | #163 Charlie wrote in post #18312824 you need to make peace with F2.8 and use it! I forced myself to use a 35f2.8 over some months, and now I'm comfortable using it despite owning faster sexier lenses. It's currently my most used lens, and I'm confident with it's use. I do with it were f2 for the better shutter speeds, but generally not an issue at that focal length. it's like shooting a smaller format, but often without the penalties when light levels are good. 1.4 or bust. I hate using the 200/2 because well... it stops at F2 lol A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcluckie I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once! 2,192 posts Gallery: 109 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 449 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area More info | Jan 06, 2019 09:32 | #164 I had one for a week. It is bad lens made fine by in-camera corrections. Turn off that, and at 2.8, vignetting is 80%. Correcting for that is nasty with lots of lost detail. And, yeah, a 2.8 prime lens is sad. I had a Voightlander 40 f2 at the time and is much superior. I was seeking a smaller kit, but both are gone in favor of a smaller Fuji system. multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2019 15:25 | #165 Since I have all crop cameras, T3i, 7D and 7DII, I have a 50 STM and the 24mm EF-S. The 50mm and 24mm get used often on my T3i and I will occasionally stick the 24mm in my pocket when shooting sports with the 7D and a telephoto if I decide I need a wider lens for team shots or something similar.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1109 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||