Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Dec 2016 (Monday) 15:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Who Kept Their Canon 40mm Pancake Lens?

 
Benitoite
Goldmember
Avatar
4,792 posts
Gallery: 438 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2164
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
     
Feb 01, 2017 03:15 |  #151

anscochrome wrote in post #18204559 (external link)
Use it all the time on FF. I just wish it were a 43,3mm instead of a 40mm https://en.wikipedia.o​rg/wiki/Normal_lens (external link)

The 43.3 is referring to the diagonal image size cast onto the 35mm film format, not a focal length.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shane_c
Senior Member
726 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
     
Mar 26, 2017 06:19 |  #152

I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had.

Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it.


Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
G1X MK2, G15
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
Shooting the breeze
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 4596
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada's Federal Capital
     
Mar 26, 2017 07:52 |  #153

shane_c wrote in post #18311096 (external link)
I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had.

Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it.

Mine's buttery smooth and almost entirely silent. Definitely not anything that I'd describe as 'gritty' or 'noisy'.


Apricane flickr (external link) IG Travel/Street (external link)
a7 IV | Ʃ 35+85/1.4 Art | SY 135/1.8 | Tmr 28-200 | Tmr 70-180/2.8 | Sony 70-350G
X-T30 | XF18-55 | XF16-80 | Ʃ 56/1.4
Capture One 23 Pro | Affinity Photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
Avatar
1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria
Post edited over 6 years ago by DaviSto. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 26, 2017 08:03 |  #154

shane_c wrote in post #18311096 (external link)
I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had.

Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it.

Mine is quite smooth with just a little motor noise. Does the focus ring still feel gritty when the camera is switched off (i.e. when its just turning aimlessly and not moving any of the elements)?


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shane_c
Senior Member
726 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
Post edited over 6 years ago by shane_c.
     
Mar 26, 2017 08:12 as a reply to  @ DaviSto's post |  #155

Yes, it's the same whether the camera is on or off. I bought it used from a camera store. I'll probably bring it in to compare to a new one, and exchange for another used one if it's drastically different.


Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
G1X MK2, G15
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
Avatar
1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria
     
Mar 26, 2017 08:17 |  #156

shane_c wrote in post #18311152 (external link)
Yes, it's the same whether the camera is on or off. I bought it used from a camera store. I'll probably bring it in to compare to a new one, and exchange for another used one if it's drastically different.

I'm no expert but I think that that is probably relatively good news ... it's just the ring mechanism itself that's a bit gritty not the actual lens internals. But no harm in seeing if you can get a better one.


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shane_c
Senior Member
726 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
     
Mar 26, 2017 08:53 as a reply to  @ DaviSto's post |  #157

That's what I'm thinking too. I watched some videos and the AF noise is the same as what I'm hearing online and it's quick and accurate. It's just the focus ring the feels a bit gritty when I turn it.


Canon R5 - Canon RF24-105L F4, Canon 40mm, Canon 70-200L F4 (non-IS), Canon 100-400ii, 1.4xiii
G1X MK2, G15
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artsf
Senior Member
400 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 395
Joined Sep 2015
     
Mar 27, 2017 08:47 |  #158

sold it soon after getting 24-70ii over a year ago. Do not miss it for a second. IQ is not even close, 24-70ii gives way better color and flexibility which is more important than just weight to me. 40mm is sharp but and not much more than that - can't do much with raw files (colors fall apart quickly when pushed).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1219
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Mar 27, 2017 11:59 |  #159

aquaforester wrote in post #18260595 (external link)
Accessory question if I can. If you use a screw in lens hood with these pancakes can you still put a lens cap on.

Yes. There is a no name soft plastic collapsable one that I use. It folds right down to make the lens no bigger while it is on. Highly recommended.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1219
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Mar 27, 2017 12:02 |  #160

shane_c wrote in post #18311096 (external link)
I had a 40 STM a while ago but sold it. Just last week I picked up a used one. The images are just as sharp and wonderful as the first one I had.

Something I don't remember with the first one, and I was hoping someone could help me out with, does the manual focus ring turn smoothly or is it somewhat noisy and gritty feeling? When in AF my used lens is quick to focus and fairly quiet but you can still hear the focus motor. But when I turn the ring in either AF or MF it has a gritty feel to it.

When in AF mode, it should turn with no effect or sound. In MF mode, it is similar to when using AF - ie you can hear the focus motor - thus it is not a good lens for video - but there shouldn't be a grinding.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 27, 2017 20:49 |  #161

I've had 3 copies now. Bought one before each vacation just to have a lighter lens...

...and then never used it on the vacation.

Won't make that mistake again.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Mar 27, 2017 21:33 |  #162

Talley wrote in post #18312790 (external link)
I've had 3 copies now. Bought one before each vacation just to have a lighter lens...

...and then never used it on the vacation.

Won't make that mistake again.

you need to make peace with F2.8 and use it!

I forced myself to use a 35f2.8 over some months, and now I'm comfortable using it despite owning faster sexier lenses. It's currently my most used lens, and I'm confident with it's use. I do with it were f2 for the better shutter speeds, but generally not an issue at that focal length.

it's like shooting a smaller format, but often without the penalties when light levels are good.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
Post edited over 6 years ago by Talley.
     
Mar 27, 2017 21:46 |  #163

Charlie wrote in post #18312824 (external link)
you need to make peace with F2.8 and use it!

I forced myself to use a 35f2.8 over some months, and now I'm comfortable using it despite owning faster sexier lenses. It's currently my most used lens, and I'm confident with it's use. I do with it were f2 for the better shutter speeds, but generally not an issue at that focal length.

it's like shooting a smaller format, but often without the penalties when light levels are good.

1.4 or bust. I hate using the 200/2 because well... it stops at F2 lol

This is a joke btw... 2.8 is fine. I dunno I just figure if I'm gonna be stuck at 2.8 I'd rather have a 24-70 II.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,192 posts
Gallery: 109 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area
     
Jan 06, 2019 09:32 |  #164

I had one for a week. It is bad lens made fine by in-camera corrections. Turn off that, and at 2.8, vignetting is 80%. Correcting for that is nasty with lots of lost detail. And, yeah, a 2.8 prime lens is sad. I had a Voightlander 40 f2 at the time and is much superior. I was seeking a smaller kit, but both are gone in favor of a smaller Fuji system.


multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
Leicas, Canons, Hasselblads
all and historic dingus

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duckster
Goldmember
2,781 posts
Gallery: 466 photos
Likes: 3876
Joined May 2017
     
Jan 06, 2019 15:25 |  #165

Since I have all crop cameras, T3i, 7D and 7DII, I have a 50 STM and the 24mm EF-S. The 50mm and 24mm get used often on my T3i and I will occasionally stick the 24mm in my pocket when shooting sports with the 7D and a telephoto if I decide I need a wider lens for team shots or something similar.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

38,085 views & 96 likes for this thread, 48 members have posted to it and it is followed by 16 members.
Who Kept Their Canon 40mm Pancake Lens?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1109 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.