Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
Thread started 13 Dec 2016 (Tuesday) 14:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is it theft?

 
craigat
Member
Avatar
167 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Boston
     
Dec 13, 2016 14:42 |  #1

I'm soon to put the following on sale:

Canon Rebel 550D T2i
EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens
EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS Telephoto Zoom Lens
Battery Grip
Extra Cannon battery
Transcend 8GB SDHC card
Tamrac 5546 Adventure 6 Photo Backpack (Gray/Black)

I have everything in and including the original packaging. The backpack shows a little wear, but is in great condition, everything else is absolutely pristine. I'm also throwing in a wired and wireless remote trigger (cheap ones) that don't work with my new camera.

Now here's the question. Originally, I had hoped to get $500-600 for everything. I have a friend who might buy it for around $500, but I don't want to rip him off - at the same time I want to get as much as I can to buy accessories for my new 5D4.

Can anyone tell me if my pricing is way off the mark (either up or down)? I see lots of stuff going cheaper, but this stuff is truly in pristine condition, not even any cosmetic damage.

Would appreciate any input you all have.

Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
domat
Senior Member
485 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2010
Location: New York
     
Dec 13, 2016 14:53 |  #2

Small theft.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 13, 2016 15:04 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

I believe what you are offering is way overpriced at $500.

T2i - $150 - $200, depending on accessories and condition.
18-55 IS (not II, or STM versions) - $50
55-250 IS (not II, or STM versions) - $50-70 (Canon is currently selling II for $110, STM for $130, with 12 mo. warranty)

The rest of the kit adds nothing to the value. It is accessories to make your older/inexpensive stuff sell before the other guy's older/inexpensive stuff. If I were selling this kit, I'd start at $350, and take the first offer over $300. If you get offered less than $300, you can counter with $300 as a place to start.

Caveats:

When I put something up for sale, I want to SELL it, not squeeze the most possible cash out of, possibly at the expense of a sale.

You can peruse E-Bay looking at similar items that have SOLD. Pay no attention to asking price, look at SOLD prices. When considering price, account for the 11% in E-Bay and PayPal fees the sale will cost you.

To answer your question, yes, selling this kit for $500 is theft. You would be taking advantage of someone's lack of knowledge of resale values. On the other side of the coin, lots of people pay more than any reasonable value every day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Dec 13, 2016 17:04 |  #4

$350 is a good place to start.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 17:27 |  #5

Your friend may find extra value in being able to obtain the package from a trusted individual and not having to deal with the overhead and risk of sourcing each item from a person or place. I've certainly paid above market for conveniences that are hard to put a value on. If you are up front about things and he finds 500$ an appropriate value for the package that's anything but theft.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nortonski
Senior Member
603 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Oct 2013
Location: Good ole Blighty
     
Dec 13, 2016 17:52 |  #6

Personally I wouldn't call it 'theft' per se, after-all, if someone were to perceive a $500 value in the kit you're selling then so be it.

For example, look at the Arabic & Chinese amongst many other cultures where the sales price starts way above what they're often prepared to sell a given item for. There is enjoyment from both sides in the haggling as it's almost a sport & both parties walk away happy in the majority of cases - the buyer as they're happy to have negotiated the seller down & the seller (in many cases) by not having to go to their lowest sustainable price & turning over stock at the same time - if neither of you can agree then you walk away...

If you're desperate to sell, then one way for sure is to sell on price, look at what similar kit goes for & match or beat it...timescales will typically be the quickest in this scenario. You often hear the phrase "it was a steal!" Not that someone stole from you, but the buyer got a screaming deal!

If however, you believe your kit has an edge in terms of condition, minimal use, extras etc & you can wait for a sale, then price it higher & be prepared to negotiate down if required in the event that selling the kit drags on & you're perhaps more motivated to shift it. This strategy often takes longer sell but can net you a greater return.

Either way, just remember a low-ball offer is not meant to be insulting, it's merely an offer to see how desperate you are to sell & for someone to get a deal...you're not compelled to accept any offer, after all it's your kit...

If it were me & selling it to a friend, I'd come from the angle of, "if you look around & want to keep your costs low, for sure you could get similar kit for around the $350 mark plus shipping. Sure mine's a higher price, but mine's in fantastic condition & too be honest, the cheaper kit's got an unknown provenance & I tell you what, I'll walk you through how to use it etc...etc...".

The ball's in their court, there's an offer of a mutually acceptable deal & you've told them they could get it cheaper, make it clear that you won't be offended if they don't want to take you up on the offer & maybe be prepared to come down a little on the price...

Suck it & see I say!


_______________
Canon EOS 5D4
EF 17-40L | EF 24L II | EF 50L | EF 85L II | EF 24-70L 2.8 II | EF 70-200L 2.8 IS | EF 50M | EF 28-135 | 600EX-RT | ST-E3-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 13, 2016 18:40 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

nqjudo wrote in post #18212238 (external link)
Your friend may find extra value in being able to obtain the package from a trusted individual and not having to deal with the overhead and risk of sourcing each item from a person or place. I've certainly paid above market for conveniences that are hard to put a value on. If you are up front about things and he finds 500$ an appropriate value for the package that's anything but theft.

Disagree, vehemently. Stealing from someone who doesn't know what he is buying is still stealing. If the seller were being 'upfront' he'd quote a fair price.

I run a newspaper/magazine stand. An obviously mentally handicapped individual selects a $3.50 magazine for purchase and hands me a $100 bill and asks, "Is this enough?" Just because he believes he is paying an appropriate price does not give me the right to steal his money. I'd give him $96.50 change and thank him for his business.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 18:49 |  #8

you're ripping off you're friend.... big time.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 19:04 |  #9

Bassat wrote in post #18212305 (external link)
Disagree, vehemently. Stealing from someone who doesn't know what he is buying is still stealing. If the seller were being 'upfront' he'd quote a fair price.

I run a newspaper/magazine stand. An obviously mentally handicapped individual selects a $3.50 magazine for purchase and hands me a $100 bill and asks, "Is this enough?" Just because he believes he is paying an appropriate price does not give me the right to steal his money. I'd give him $96.50 change and thank him for his business.

I never said anything about not disclosing the value. In fact I recommended being up front. What do you think that means? Hiding things? It means explaining what the products are worth on the market, the benefits of buying from a trusted source and the potential pitfalls of buying used gear also with the consideration that putting a kit together takes time and resources. Those factors alone could well be worth the extra cost to some buyers. No one is suggesting stealing from anyone, let alone someone who is handicapped and the insinuation is, as mildly as I can put it on the forum, obtuse. This is a free market my friend. People have a right to pay whatever they want for something if they find that much value in it and they should also inform themselves. Caveat emptor as the saying goes.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 19:18 |  #10

nqjudo wrote in post #18212326 (external link)
I never said anything about not disclosing the value. In fact I recommended being up front. What do you think that means? Hiding things? It means explaining what the products are worth on the market, the benefits of buying from a trusted source and the potential pitfalls of buying used gear also with the consideration that putting a kit together takes time and resources. Those factors alone could well be worth the extra cost to some buyers. No one is suggesting stealing from anyone, let alone someone who is handicapped and the insinuation is, as mildly as I can put it on the forum, obtuse. This is a free market my friend. People have a right to pay whatever they want for something if they find that much value in it and they should also inform themselves. Caveat emptor as the saying goes.

no, no, no.

A friend is buying a t2i with kit lenses..... safe to assume that it's a noobie.

An experienced shooter sells to so called friend, capitalizes on ignorance.... is no friend.

Want to get 500 for the kit? list it on ebay for 550 to cover your fees.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 19:28 |  #11

Charlie wrote in post #18212337 (external link)
no, no, no.

A friend is buying a t2i with kit lenses..... safe to assume that it's a noobie.

An experienced shooter sells to so called friend, capitalizes on ignorance.... is no friend.

Want to get 500 for the kit? list it on ebay for 550 to cover your fees.

English isn't my first language and I assume either you're in the same boat or you didn't read my post thoroughly. This is very simple. Educate the friend - more than any other seller will do - and let him decide how much buying from a trustworthy source who will provide support and expertise is worth. Otherwise, he has the choice to go on EBay and buy something he knows nothing about from someone he doesn't know for that same 500$. What you are saying is it will sell on eBay for 500 right? So is that not a fair market value?


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Dec 13, 2016 19:34 |  #12

Personally, I am the only one to take responsibility for what I buy, it is nobody's else's job. If I have a friend selling something, I don't care what he is asking, I will do my homework first.

Therefore as a seller, I expect the same from buyers, even my friends. I can ask whatever price I want, and they can refuse to buy it. It is that simple.

I get really tired of hearing how I am responsible for other people and what they spend, etc. I take responsibility for myself and that is enough.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 13, 2016 19:44 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

nqjudo wrote in post #18212326 (external link)
I never said anything about not disclosing the value. In fact I recommended being up front. What do you think that means? Hiding things? It means explaining what the products are worth on the market, the benefits of buying from a trusted source and the potential pitfalls of buying used gear also with the consideration that putting a kit together takes time and resources. Those factors alone could well be worth the extra cost to some buyers. No one is suggesting stealing from anyone, let alone someone who is handicapped and the insinuation is, as mildly as I can put it on the forum, obtuse. This is a free market my friend. People have a right to pay whatever they want for something if they find that much value in it and they should also inform themselves. Caveat emptor as the saying goes.

If I sold $350 worth of gear to a friend for $500, I'd know I took advantage of her. Since I'm selling this friend gear she isn't familiar with, I'd throw in the 'education' for nothing. I'd have to be a really slick salesman to tell her it is only worth $350, but she should pay me $500 for it. Do you actually believe anyone would take that deal?

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18212342 (external link)
Personally, I am the only one to take responsibility for what I buy, it is nobody's else's job. If I have a friend selling something, I don't care what he is asking, I will do my homework first.

Therefore as a seller, I expect the same from buyers, even my friends. I can ask whatever price I want, and they can refuse to buy it. It is that simple.

I get really tired of hearing how I am responsible for other people and what they spend, etc. I take responsibility for myself and that is enough.

I think this thread is lost on you. I don't believe you would offer $350 worth of gear for $500 in the first place. My apologies if that is not true.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 19:49 |  #14

nqjudo wrote in post #18212340 (external link)
English isn't my first language and I assume either you're in the same boat or you didn't read my post thoroughly. This is very simple. Educate the friend - more than any other seller will do - and let him decide how much buying from a trustworthy source who will provide support and expertise is worth. Otherwise, he has the choice to go on EBay and buy something he knows nothing about from someone he doesn't know for that same 500$. What you are saying is it will sell on eBay for 500 right? So is that not a fair market value?

I can list the nifty fifty for $200 on ebay, does it mean it'll sell?


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Dec 13, 2016 20:01 |  #15

Bassat wrote in post #18212352 (external link)
If I sold $350 worth of gear to a friend for $500, I'd know I took advantage of her. Since I'm selling this friend gear she isn't familiar with, I'd throw in the 'education' for nothing. I'd have to be a really slick salesman to tell her it is only worth $350, but she should pay me $500 for it. Do you actually believe anyone would take that deal?

Look, this is not that complicated. If you are able to sell your gear for 500$ on an open platform that's available to the general public then that's the market value. If you sell it to a friend for 350$ you're either completely lacking in financial savvy or overly generous. Either way your loss.

For the record I completely agree with TeamSpeed. Everyone has an obligation to protect their own interests. Finally, the best advice that this thread has yet to see is that it is never a good idea to sell things to family or friends. If they matter that much save yourself the headaches and don't risk anything coming between you and them. Sell it elsewhere or give it to them.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,658 views & 10 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
Is it theft?
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1551 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.