Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Dec 2016 (Sunday) 21:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 5DmkIV exposure question

 
gqllc007
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Dec 25, 2016 21:56 |  #1

Is there anyway I can be in manual and have the Auto ISO work while using external 600 speed lite.
Basically can I set say 1/125 or 1/200 so flash is not in high speed sync and aperture F2.8 and have the Auto ISO work? I tried this and the ISO ALWAYS went to 400. It was not the correct exposure. Is there settings on camera or flash that allows this?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 25, 2016 22:13 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Auto-ISO with flash will always go to ISO 400. Every Canon camera I've ever had does that. Manual exposure with auto-ISO and ETTL flash is a far cry from manual.

If you have the flash turned on, and a manual over-exposure dialed in, you're going to get over-exposure. You do realize that manual ambient and flash are two entirely separate and distinct exposure right? Perhaps an example, with intact EXIF will help us help you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,771 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16869
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 6 years ago by digital paradise.
     
Dec 25, 2016 22:59 |  #3

I was on another site where someone was having this exact same issue so I'm interested. I've never used auto ISO for anything. Why does it default to 400? Why is that the base number and not 200 or 800?


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Dec 25, 2016 23:16 |  #4

Auto ISO with flash will always default to 400. Why 400 was chosen, I have no idea. Perhaps it was considered a good compromise.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,771 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16869
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Dec 25, 2016 23:18 |  #5

Interesting. Thanks.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Dec 25, 2016 23:30 |  #6

The reasons for not having the ISO still be "automatic" with flash, are all about how ISO effects a flash image. It can be DRAMATIC. Like two entirely different images going from ISO 200 up to ISO 1600,..

eg: A person standing in front of a black background with only the subject lit, vs. a subject in front of a very visible well lit background.

Which did the photographer want? Auto ISO mixed with flash would take that choice away.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Dec 26, 2016 06:32 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #7

So here is what I am looking for.
Lets say I am using 135 F/2 lens.
I am outside
Subject is in the shade
Let's use sunny 16 rule for shade so
1/125 (close enough to 1/100) at F 5.6 ISO 100
So I want to shoot at F/2
That's 3 stops from 5.6
So 1/125=1/1000 at F2
If I want to use Fill Flash for catch lights providing I don't have any other ways but natural lighting
I have to put the speedlight in high speed sync (that reduces flash power) and if I use a flash card like a Rogue bender in bounce there doesn't seem to be enough flash as the catchlights are barely visible.
What is the solution when you can't bring other equipment along and you want some fill and/or catchlights??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 26, 2016 07:46 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Post a photo with EXIF, including all camera and flash settings.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
Post edited over 6 years ago by apersson850.
     
Dec 26, 2016 10:48 |  #9

The reason Auto ISO gets fixed when used with a flash is because it has to.
If you are using the flash with a manual setting, then you have to know the ISO beforehand, or you don't know how to set the flash.
If you are using E-TTL II, then you run into the conflict that you get a measurement for ambient light first, giving a certain combination you can see in the viewfinder. Aperture, time and ISO, it's all there. Then you press the trigger button and the camera finds out that the ISO chosen doesn't work with the flash. It's either too high or too low. Thus the ISO has to be changed, but there's no time to tell the user that the camera has changed one of the conditions used to determine the proper time and aperture for the ambient light.

Thus Canon has chosen to give you fixed value for ISO, in case (to be brutally correct) you are stupid enough to use Auto ISO with flash. They give you ISO 400 for all cases except if you set the camera to P mode, thus probably indicating you want as much automation as possible. In that case you get ISO 400 with the flash aimed directly at the subject, but ISO 1600 if bouncing the flash.

Anyway, I can't see how auto ISO would have solved the issue you outlined above.

You have 1/125 s, f/5.6 and ISO 100, but you want to use f/2. Thus you have to go to 1/1000 s, which in turn requires high speed flash sync.

I fail to see how auto ISO would have solved that problem for you? Aren't you looking for the auto ISO function to solve an issue it can't, even if one would disregard the problems with auto ISO with flash I outlined above?


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,771 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16869
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Dec 26, 2016 11:18 |  #10

apersson850 wrote in post #18223885 (external link)
The reason Auto ISO gets fixed when used with a flash is because it has to.
If you are using the flash with a manual setting, then you have to know the ISO beforehand, or you don't know how to set the flash.
If you are using E-TTL II, then you run into the conflict that you get a measurement for ambient light first, giving a certain combination you can see in the viewfinder. Aperture, time and ISO, it's all there. Then you press the trigger button and the camera finds out that the ISO chosen doesn't work with the flash. It's either too high or too low. Thus the ISO has to be changed, but there's no time to tell the user that the camera has changed one of the conditions used to determine the proper time and aperture for the ambient light.

Thus Canon has chosen to give you fixed value for ISO, in case (to be brutally correct) you are stupid enough to use Auto ISO with flash. They give you ISO 400 for all cases except if you set the camera to P mode, thus probably indicating you want as much automation as possible. In that case you get ISO 400 with the flash aimed directly at the subject, but ISO 1600 if bouncing the flash.

Anyway, I can't see how auto ISO would have solved the issue you outlined above.

You have 1/125 s, f/5.6 and ISO 100, but you want to use f/2. Thus you have to go to 1/1000 s, which in turn requires high speed flash sync.

I fail to see how auto ISO would have solved that problem for you? Aren't you looking for the auto ISO function to solve an issue it can't, even if one would disregard the problems with auto ISO with flash I outlined above?

Good explanation.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Dec 26, 2016 13:23 |  #11

gqllc007 wrote in post #18223767 (external link)
So here is what I am looking for.
Lets say I am using 135 F/2 lens.
I am outside
Subject is in the shade
Let's use sunny 16 rule for shade so
1/125 (close enough to 1/100) at F 5.6 ISO 100
So I want to shoot at F/2
That's 3 stops from 5.6
So 1/125=1/1000 at F2
If I want to use Fill Flash for catch lights providing I don't have any other ways but natural lighting
I have to put the speedlight in high speed sync (that reduces flash power) and if I use a flash card like a Rogue bender in bounce there doesn't seem to be enough flash as the catchlights are barely visible.
What is the solution when you can't bring other equipment along and you want some fill and/or catchlights??

If you want to use F/2 and not use HSS then you wiil need to use a ND filter to keep your shutter speed down...this will avoid the need for HSS and will give you more power available from your speedlight.


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 6 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. (3 edits in all)
     
Dec 26, 2016 15:14 |  #12

gqllc007 wrote in post #18223767 (external link)
So here is what I am looking for.
Lets say I am using 135 F/2 lens.
I am outside
Subject is in the shade
Let's use sunny 16 rule for shade so
1/125 (close enough to 1/100) at F 5.6 ISO 100
So I want to shoot at F/2
That's 3 stops from 5.6
So 1/125=1/1000 at F2
If I want to use Fill Flash for catch lights providing I don't have any other ways but natural lighting
I have to put the speedlight in high speed sync (that reduces flash power) and if I use a flash card like a Rogue bender in bounce there doesn't seem to be enough flash as the catchlights are barely visible.
What is the solution when you can't bring other equipment along and you want some fill and/or catchlights??


I don't know what that has to do with auto iso with flash?
Is this an actual question that is unrelated to our current topic? (solution being ND filter as Don mentions)

Or are you trying to make a point which is going over my head?


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Dec 26, 2016 18:48 |  #13

No not trying to post something irrelevant lol.
I accepted ISO 400 in M mode and the explanation makes great sense
I had totally brain farted on ND filters so instead of posting a new thread I posted my question in here. I should have stated that first! My bad. Again I completely forgot about my ND filters




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Dec 27, 2016 02:45 |  #14

Putting on an ND filter will eliminate the need for high speed sync, provided the filter is dense enough. But it will still require (in this particular example) four times as much power from the flash, if we presume we go down from 1/1000 to 1/250 to avoid high speed sync demand.
It's probably still better than using HSS, but it's not for free, so to speak. Actually the difference may be so small that using HSS and not bothering putting on the ND filter may still be the sensible remedy, at least in some cases.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 27, 2016 08:44 |  #15

I haven't seen any mention of upping the flash power, either through manual flash or Flash Exposure Compensation...?

I'm not a flash expert, but would that be a useful consideration in using fill light with a shady subject, if not using an ND filter?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,483 views & 5 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
Canon 5DmkIV exposure question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1507 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.