go4saket wrote in post #18242067
I have been using Windows all my life and am very comfortable with it. I have recently started learning photography and am going for it professionally and for that I need to change my laptop which has a crappie screen. Most of my photographer friends are using Mac with Ratina screen and they all are pushing me towards Mac. I seriously am not very keen in learning a new OS and therefore want to stick with Windows. I will be using PS CC, LR CC and Premiere for Video editing.
All of those programs work the same on either system, if you already have the licenses for the Windows versions and are comfortable with the OS, there is no reason to switch.
My biggest concern is the screen quality where I dont want to compromise even if it means shifting to Mac. Now please suggest what should I do? Is there no good enough laptop with Windows that can give equal screen quality as Mac?
If you look to business-class laptops, those may offer 4K IPS displays with calibration, but consumer and "gaming" laptops typically will not. That is, if you really want a laptop... it's a better idea just to get a basic PC, perhaps in ITX form-factor to cut down on size if it's an issue, and then you'll be able to use a proper display of your choosing, and of course it's much less expensive - even if laptops are slowly coming out of the "2x the price for half the performance" phase as hardware becomes more efficient, now they're just "2x the price for same performance"
Other than screen, is Mac really that better that I should shift in terms of performance and user friendliness?
User friendliness just means it'll take less time to have to re-learn everything. Generally, Macs are more expensive performance-per-dollar, although this isn't always the case. Back when I bought mine in late 2010 it was a pretty good deal as 1440p IPS displays were still in the $1000 range at the time, but with the mac you also got a decent computer in for a little bit extra. Same happened with the 5K iMac at release, if you really want 5K and a new system to go with it, then it's still an inexpensive way to get it. Just remember that unlike the original iMacs, the retina ones can't be used as stand-alone displays.
The issue is that the iMac's display is just too glossy for my taste, and now that I have a proper editing display as my primary monitor, I don't feel like going the same route again. With Apple lacking a proper desktop system, and the Mac Pro being phased out, I don't feel like I'd get anything out of going Mac again. Power-users are slowly starting to leave Macs because of this, but for basic photo editing, I think any Mac is fine unless you're going to be doing some crazy gigapixel compositing work.