Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 12 Jan 2017 (Thursday) 10:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mac or Windows for Photo editing?

 
this thread is locked
go4saket
Member
128 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2007
Location: India
     
Jan 12, 2017 10:32 |  #1

Hi guys!

I have been using Windows all my life and am very comfortable with it. I have recently started learning photography and am going for it professionally and for that I need to change my laptop which has a crappie screen. Most of my photographer friends are using Mac with Ratina screen and they all are pushing me towards Mac. I seriously am not very keen in learning a new OS and therefore want to stick with Windows. I will be using PS CC, LR CC and Premiere for Video editing.

My biggest concern is the screen quality where I dont want to compromise even if it means shifting to Mac. Now please suggest what should I do? Is there no good enough laptop with Windows that can give equal screen quality as Mac?

Other than screen, is Mac really that better that I should shift in terms of performance and user friendliness?

Please help.


Canon 6D, 24-105 f/4L IS, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 50MM f/1.8, Yongnuo 600RT+E3RT, Sekonic L-308S
Experience : Professional :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jethr0
Goldmember
Avatar
1,050 posts
Gallery: 91 photos
Likes: 733
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 12, 2017 10:57 |  #2

I previously used Windows based systems for photo editing.
A few years ago I picked up a MacBook and made the switch. I like the quality & stability of the hardware, and Mac OS seems to be less susceptible to malware and viruses.

On the subject of displays - In my opinion the 'retina' display while really nice to look at isn't the best for photo editing. I use a IPS LED display (calibrated) attached to my MacBook Pro for editing.


www.jefflowe.ca (external link)
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jeff​lowe.ca (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 12, 2017 13:56 |  #3
bannedPermanently

go4saket wrote in post #18242067 (external link)
Hi guys!

I have been using Windows all my life and am very comfortable with it. I have recently started learning photography and am going for it professionally and for that I need to change my laptop which has a crappie screen. Most of my photographer friends are using Mac with Ratina screen and they all are pushing me towards Mac. I seriously am not very keen in learning a new OS and therefore want to stick with Windows. I will be using PS CC, LR CC and Premiere for Video editing.

My biggest concern is the screen quality where I dont want to compromise even if it means shifting to Mac. Now please suggest what should I do? Is there no good enough laptop with Windows that can give equal screen quality as Mac?

Other than screen, is Mac really that better that I should shift in terms of performance and user friendliness?

Please help.

Editing photos on a Mac is just the same as editing photos on a PC. If you are more comfortable using Windows then stay with a PC.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjbsav
Goldmember
Avatar
1,283 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 806
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Savannah, GA
     
Jan 12, 2017 14:26 as a reply to  @ NullMember's post |  #4

I 100% agree. There really isn't any great advantages to moving to Mac. I own both.


My name is Ben from Savannah, GA
Canon cameras and glass
Facebook - Brengman Photography (external link) My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jan 12, 2017 14:34 |  #5

There are several high end Windows laptop machines out there with 17" 4K displays doing 98%+ AdobeRGB colour. and they cost about the same as a fully specced MBP. Apart from the IMO advantage of the extra mouse button, and using Ctrl instead of Cmd there is NO difference between using LR/PS/Premier under Win 10 and OSX. One thing I have noticed is that Win 10's screen magnification system for 4/5K displays is much better than what is available in OSX. A friend went out and bought one of the 2560×1440 27" iMacs, but his eyesight is so bad that he has to run it at lower than native resolutions to be able to see anything on the screen. It looks absolutely awful like that though, fortunatly for him he can't see ithe would have been better off with a £100 24" 1920×1080 monitor, at least he wouldn't be out all that money. I can just set my 5K Dell monitor to 250% instead of the 175% I use, or the 200% MS Recommend, which would match it to a 2560 display, and he would be able to see everything, while the monitor itself was still running at 5K and looking great. The font smoothing alone is worth it. So yes plenty of choices for Windows.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Avatar
2,713 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 724
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jan 12, 2017 15:30 |  #6

Use whichever you prefer.

Higher end spec wise, Apple is usually bested by the displays and some of the options in some of the higher end Windows systems. Pricing will be comparable to Apple at that level if you're looking at laptops.

For desktops, I'd go Windows, but I'm not much for the iMac design/philosophy of an all-in-one and there are better monitor options out there anyway.


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.com (external link)
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8356
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
Post edited over 6 years ago by Tom Reichner. (3 edits in all)
     
Jan 13, 2017 00:20 |  #7

go4saket wrote in post #18242067 (external link)
I have been using Windows all my life and am very comfortable with it.

That statement right there makes me feel as though you should stick to Windows.

Personally, I love Apple, and don't think I would ever go back to Windows - but that is because I was never comfortable with Windows.

In years and years of using Windows computers, I was continually confused and couldn't figure out how to get the damn computer to work and got viruses all the time and my windows computers were always "down" and I would have to pay a company to wipe the thing clean and then reinstall everything.

Once I got an iMac all of those problems went away and I never had any of them again.

But I am me and you are you, and if you can actually function productively in the Windows environment, then you have a good thing going and you should stick to what works so well for you.

The iMac is so good for me because I demand a large monitor, yet am constantly packing my computer in the car and taking it with me to various places throughout the week. A laptop does me no good because I can't imagine trying to enjoy or work on photos on a tiny little screen (and to me 15 or 18 inches is tiny). And a traditional desktop does me no good because it's too much trouble to regularly take it out and about with me to various meetings, friend's homes, church, work, photo trips, etc.

So all-in-ones may be great for your particular needs, or they may not be. But I think that these days you can get really great screens in Windows-based all-in-ones.

The 5k resolution combined with a really big monitor helps a lot with photo editing, because I am continually zooming in really far to work on extremely fine detail. If you zoom in really far on a small screen, you then don't have any context for the area you are working on, which can be troublesome when you are trying to maintain a cohesive aesthetic throughout the entire image, while performing major work on one tiny little spot at a time.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jan 13, 2017 02:09 |  #8

Neither OS has any advantage for photo work.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
Post edited over 6 years ago by Kolor-Pikker. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 13, 2017 05:24 |  #9

go4saket wrote in post #18242067 (external link)
I have been using Windows all my life and am very comfortable with it. I have recently started learning photography and am going for it professionally and for that I need to change my laptop which has a crappie screen. Most of my photographer friends are using Mac with Ratina screen and they all are pushing me towards Mac. I seriously am not very keen in learning a new OS and therefore want to stick with Windows. I will be using PS CC, LR CC and Premiere for Video editing.

All of those programs work the same on either system, if you already have the licenses for the Windows versions and are comfortable with the OS, there is no reason to switch.

My biggest concern is the screen quality where I dont want to compromise even if it means shifting to Mac. Now please suggest what should I do? Is there no good enough laptop with Windows that can give equal screen quality as Mac?

If you look to business-class laptops, those may offer 4K IPS displays with calibration, but consumer and "gaming" laptops typically will not. That is, if you really want a laptop... it's a better idea just to get a basic PC, perhaps in ITX form-factor to cut down on size if it's an issue, and then you'll be able to use a proper display of your choosing, and of course it's much less expensive - even if laptops are slowly coming out of the "2x the price for half the performance" phase as hardware becomes more efficient, now they're just "2x the price for same performance"

Other than screen, is Mac really that better that I should shift in terms of performance and user friendliness?

User friendliness just means it'll take less time to have to re-learn everything. Generally, Macs are more expensive performance-per-dollar, although this isn't always the case. Back when I bought mine in late 2010 it was a pretty good deal as 1440p IPS displays were still in the $1000 range at the time, but with the mac you also got a decent computer in for a little bit extra. Same happened with the 5K iMac at release, if you really want 5K and a new system to go with it, then it's still an inexpensive way to get it. Just remember that unlike the original iMacs, the retina ones can't be used as stand-alone displays.

The issue is that the iMac's display is just too glossy for my taste, and now that I have a proper editing display as my primary monitor, I don't feel like going the same route again. With Apple lacking a proper desktop system, and the Mac Pro being phased out, I don't feel like I'd get anything out of going Mac again. Power-users are slowly starting to leave Macs because of this, but for basic photo editing, I think any Mac is fine unless you're going to be doing some crazy gigapixel compositing work.


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,370 posts
Gallery: 1218 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 32725
Joined Oct 2015
Location: Darwin, Straya
     
Jan 13, 2017 05:45 |  #10

BigAl007 wrote in post #18242303 (external link)
Apart from the IMO advantage of the extra mouse button



The thread question's a bit like asking is Canon or Nikon better for photo shooting. But I just want to point out that unless windows mouses have three buttons these days, the statement above is not correct. Apple mouses, while not having actual buttons as such, can be left or right clicked in the same way windows mouses can. You just have to set them to do that in preferences.


Still waiting for the wisdom they promised would be worth getting old for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
go4saket
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
128 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2007
Location: India
     
Jan 13, 2017 07:15 |  #11

Thanks a lot for the suggestions guys but what I missed in my post was that I have to buy a 15" laptop and not a desktop for the time being...

I did some research and some websites suggested Asus ZenBook for Windows... Is this the one that I should opt for or some thing else?


Canon 6D, 24-105 f/4L IS, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 50MM f/1.8, Yongnuo 600RT+E3RT, Sekonic L-308S
Experience : Professional :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
3Rotor
Senior Member
953 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 802
Joined May 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Post edited over 6 years ago by 3Rotor.
     
Jan 13, 2017 07:36 |  #12

I would have to agree with most in here as well. Stick with what you know, the advantages are minimal with either system in our world. I use a Mac at work and PC at home. Though I have been out of customizing and specing out new computers but if you a have a good understanding of desktops, laptops are no different. Just spec it out as you would a desktop.

I briefly looked at the ZenBook you mentioned just now and it looks to be a nice system. I have no experience with it, I really have no say so in recommending it.

Good luck!


Instagram (external link)
www.jessemak.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,579 posts
Likes: 993
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Jan 13, 2017 08:18 |  #13

After you upgrade, you can take that old laptop and install Linux on it, giving you a machine you can use to surf the Internet with zero percent chance of getting a Windows virus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Codda
Member
229 posts
Likes: 10
Joined May 2011
     
Jan 13, 2017 08:54 |  #14

Kolor-Pikker wrote in post #18242935 (external link)
The issue is that the iMac's display is just too glossy for my taste, and now that I have a proper editing display as my primary monitor, I don't feel like going the same route again. With Apple lacking a proper desktop system, and the Mac Pro being phased out, I don't feel like I'd get anything out of going Mac again. Power-users are slowly starting to leave Macs because of this, but for basic photo editing, I think any Mac is fine unless you're going to be doing some crazy gigapixel compositing work.

Of course none of this is official ... Just opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ hulk
"I am not that incredible nowadays"
253 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Feb 2015
     
Jan 13, 2017 12:07 |  #15

Is it possible to calibrate and profiling a Mac monitor?

I think a Mac Mini with a good quality external monitor is the best way if going with Apple.

A calibrated monitor is way more important than what kind of operative system you are on.

I switched from Windows to Mac a couple of years a go because I like the user interface a lot. Other than that I cant find any difference when working with Adobe software.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,852 views & 42 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it and it is followed by 11 members.
Mac or Windows for Photo editing?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1094 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.