Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 14 Jan 2017 (Saturday) 13:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monopod head for 7d2 w/ 400/5.6

 
tomj
Senior Member
706 posts
Likes: 61
Joined May 2010
     
Jan 14, 2017 13:32 |  #1

I'm looking for an inexpensive tilt head for occasional use with a 7dmkii and 400/5.6 lens. I'm considering the Manfrotto 234rc and Benro dj90. They seem to have similar specs. The main concern I have with both is their fairly light load capacity rating of 5.5 lbs. Even so, the Manfrotto seems to be widely used successfully with camera/lens setups like mine, and even heavier. I haven't found much about user experience with the Benro.

I think the Manfrotto would be a safe choice, but would prefer the Benro because it uses an AS-style plate. Anyone have experience or opinions on either of these?


Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sgt.
Senior Member
Avatar
914 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 671
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge,Ontario
     
Jan 14, 2017 15:28 |  #2

I would not use a ball head with that lens again.
Always some movement.
I switched to a jobu last year and wont be looking back anytime soon.
If I was going to use a monopod, I would just thread it right onto the lens foot.


Iain
7D MKII
Another minion in the Pondrader fan club

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Jan 14, 2017 15:38 |  #3

I have a cheap manfrotto tilt head on my monopod and I use a 1DX with a 500f4 lens so dont worry about the load capacity it means nothing..
If I was to be totally honest I would say that I thought it was a good idea to have a tilt head on a monopod, but in fact I never use mine it is always locked solid. Save your money and just screw the monopod to the lens foot....


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 6 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. (5 edits in all)
     
Jan 14, 2017 15:42 |  #4

I use this one;
https://smile.amazon.c​om …TF8&qid=1484429​823&sr=8-1 (external link)

It's a best bang for your buck IMHO.

If that's too pricey, these should also work well;
https://smile.amazon.c​om …F8&qid=14844298​23&sr=8-16 (external link)
https://smile.amazon.c​om …F8&qid=14844304​07&sr=8-55 (external link)

Good, but don't include the Arca clamp;
https://smile.amazon.c​om …F8&qid=14844301​29&sr=8-11 (external link)
https://smile.amazon.c​om …F8&qid=14844301​07&sr=8-42 (external link)
https://smile.amazon.c​om …F8&qid=14844301​29&sr=8-18 (external link)
Definitely use a tilt only head like these, as opposed to a ballhead.

I like these well made solid machined aluminum ones with built in Arca clamp a lot more than the Manfrotto or Benro. I had the Manfrotto years ago, it did the job, but was not as nice.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
706 posts
Likes: 61
Joined May 2010
     
Jan 15, 2017 11:04 |  #5

Thanks all for the feedback.

Sgt. & don1163 - I agree about using a ball head, but the tilt heads are intended for monopod use and seem to work fine. I've been using a monopod for years with no head, and while it's fine most of the time, I occasionally have situations where I need to point the camera up, usually quickly, and the monopod just seems cumbersome. I just want to see if a tilt head will help in these case, it seems to for others.

CyberDyneSystems - Thanks for posting the links, it's a great help. I'm probably going to try one of the ones that don't include a clamp, as I have one that should work.

Thanks again.


Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 24, 2017 19:29 |  #6

When I started "shopping" for such gear...

I had used "cheap" tripods, and was really disappointed! I'd put some lightweight gear on and I'd watch as the kit would sag...

Well, then, when looking at gear, I would read into the specs. I wanted a ballhead that would support the weight of my "serious gear. a major point was my first "birding" lens, which was the 300mm f/2.8 IS Canon lens, a good, hefty bit of kit!

I don't remember the actual weight of that lens. At any rate, I looked at the various Manfrotto heads, I believe I grabbed one that was specced at 13 lbs. I don't recall for sure, but even though the combination of tripod/head was "spendy", well, guess what? I did what I needed to do, and that bit of kit served me well over the years!

So yeah, it can truly "pay" to buy for good quality/performance, and when dealing with gear of some considerable weight, then yeah, do what will work!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Apr 03, 2017 00:06 |  #7

tonylong wrote in post #18284305 (external link)
So yeah, it can truly "pay" to buy for good quality/performance, and when dealing with gear of some considerable weight, then yeah, do what will work!

Agree 100%. I tried cheap and light with my monopod and nearly payed the price (it still fell apart, just not with my camera attached). It might seem silly to spend more on the head than the monopod itself, and end up nearly doubling the weight, but for me it was well worth it. I guess if you are used to using one without a head, it might be different, but whenever anyone mentions 'inexpensive' to do with tripod/monopod/heads/c​lamps I shudder a little.

Of course that doesn't mean you have to go with the really super-expensive stuff.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigVinnie
Senior Member
Avatar
835 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Roaming the USA
     
Apr 06, 2017 12:12 |  #8

I've been looking at tilt heads as well. One downside to most of them is the clamp having a single orientation.

Sadly, descriptions are not consistent which makes searching difficult. You never know what gets returned.

I think I found one that will suit me and might work for you as well.
http://a.co/1tlx1tM (external link)

The ability to rotate the mount easily is high on my wants list.


Act1 Photo Booths (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Apr 06, 2017 17:40 as a reply to  @ bigVinnie's post |  #9

Funnily enough the ability to rotate the head/lens was the feature I was specifically trying to avoid when I bough my Mono Pod head! A Mono Pod head that can swivel as well as tilt? I don't think that I have enough arms for that!

Still we are all different and have different needs - nice looking head for the price though:-)


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigVinnie
Senior Member
Avatar
835 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Roaming the USA
     
Apr 06, 2017 17:54 |  #10

I get that. Reason I don't want a ball head. I just wanted to be able to switch from a long lens to a short lens and L bracket. Those have different orientations of the clamp.

There is such a thing as a cross clamp https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …_style_quick_re​lease.html (external link)

But frankly it is cost prohibitive.


Act1 Photo Booths (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Apr 06, 2017 18:00 as a reply to  @ bigVinnie's post |  #11

Ahh! I never thought of that!

Good point! You (I) learn something new every day:-)


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,956 views & 6 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Monopod head for 7d2 w/ 400/5.6
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1503 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.