Because the subject will be looking at the screen instead of where you want them during the exposure?
Exactly!
/Jocce
Jan 21, 2017 06:59 | #16 bumpintheroad wrote in post #18251020 Because the subject will be looking at the screen instead of where you want them during the exposure? Exactly!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. | Jan 21, 2017 07:56 | #17 Have either of you taken corporate shots before? I have and never had an issue with people looking at me when I have requested as I take a shot. I have done several of these in the past, with others milling around, etc. These aren't children. Live view means you can trigger this exactly when you want once everything is ready remotely, no messing with camera, etc. It is also faster. Just an idea, that is why we have WiFi enable cameras now, just for these types of requests, and it works great for studio style shooting. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 22, 2017 06:27 | #18 TeamSpeed wrote in post #18251165 Have either of you taken corporate shots before? I have and never had an issue with people looking at me when I have requested as I take a shot. I have done several of these in the past, with others milling around, etc. These aren't children. Live view means you can trigger this exactly when you want once everything is ready remotely, no messing with camera, etc. It is also faster. Just an idea, that is why we have WiFi enable cameras now, just for these types of requests, and it works great for studio style shooting. I don't understand why you feel the need to be condescending. But since you challenged, you should know I shot over 100 corporate headshots last year; full headshots, not ID photos. I've also done ID photos -- as many as 600 in 4 days for one company -- but that was a while ago. My volume is lower now because photography isn't my full time job at present. -- Mark | Gear | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all) | I was truly curious, and didnt mean any offense, it sounds like we are shooting different things then. When shooting for badge shots, you have to have only part of the person visible, it isn't a conventional portrait. So much like a BMV, you have everything statically set up and you shoot quickly. Asking somebody to look at me right at time of the shot and triggering the camera on the tripod using live view or phone or wireless trigger works great, showing them the product after again wirelessly on a 10" tablet has worked out well. When shooting actual portraits of couples and families, this set up doesn't work as well, and i'll never do it that way. But shoulder-up badge shots are quite a bit more forgiving and certainly less creative. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gungnir Senior Member More info | Jan 22, 2017 07:35 | #20 If you had large screen using live view directly in the clients line of sight wouldn't it be noticable in the catchlights? Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (3 edits in all) | Jan 22, 2017 09:05 | #21 Since these are not typical portraits but instead badge photos that are probably 2x3 or smaller, I doubt any artifacts of the shoot would be noticeable. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2017 07:41 | #22 TeamSpeed wrote in post #18252135 I was truly curious, and didnt mean any offense, it sounds like we are shooting different things then. When shooting for badge shots, you have to have only part of the person visible, it isn't a conventional portrait. So much like a BMV, you have everything statically set up and you shoot quickly. Asking somebody to look at me right at time of the shot and triggering the camera on the tripod using live view or phone or wireless trigger works great, showing them the product after again wirelessly on a 10" tablet has worked out well. When shooting actual portraits of couples and families, this set up doesn't work as well, and i'll never do it that way. But shoulder-up badge shots are quite a bit more forgiving and certainly less creative. Your answer did seem flippant and dismissive when I read it again though. If you are the photographer, obviously you would be commanding the scene and the subject wouldn't be looking at a screen of themselves as you take the shot. It sounds like we're talking about the same result just different means. -- Mark | Gear | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (9 edits in all) | Definitely see why you do what you do, it is very hard for me too to go through live view when I have shot through a viewfinder forever it seems. If the shoot is more of an "assembly line" however, like some corporate shoots can be, then setting everything up statically from where the person will stand, the camera on a tripod, etc. it can be much simpler just shooting remotely by triggering the shot from the tablet and showing the person afterwards too, you don't have to be in front of them at all. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1673 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||