Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 19 Jan 2017 (Thursday) 17:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is there a way to measure the "true" focal length of a lens?

 
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
2,508 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1107
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
     
Jan 19, 2017 17:32 |  #1

So we all know that sometimes lenses aren't exactly what they say. Between focus breathing and just straight up false advertising, our focal lengths aren't always what is listed on the side of the lens. Is there an accurate way to measure the true focal length of a lens? Here is an image for comparison. First image was taken with my 24-70 f2.8L II at 70mm. The second image was taken with my 70-200 2.8 IS II at 70mm. I didn't do any post on these images. Only thing I did was move the 24-70 slightly forward so the last element of the lens matched up to where the last element of the 70-200 was. I couldn't decide if that was a more true test or if having the sensor in the same spot was a more true test, but I ultimately moved the sensor slightly forward to match the ends of the lenses up.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/01/3/LQ_835739.jpg
Image hosted by forum (835739) © Jarvis Creative Studios [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/01/3/LQ_835740.jpg
Image hosted by forum (835740) © Jarvis Creative Studios [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony ZV-1 || Sony a7RIV || Sony a9 || Sony a1 || Sony FE 20mm f1.8 G || Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 GM || Sony FE 50mm f1.2 GM || Sony FE 90mm f2.8 Macro G OSS || Sony FE 135mm f1.8 GM || Sony FE 200-600 f5.6-6.3 G OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jan 19, 2017 17:38 |  #2

I did the very same test years ago, only with the 24-70mm mark I. And got the same results. Canon does publish the angle of view of all theirs lenses. So I guess you can take that and pop it into a formula somewhere and get the effective focal length.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 19, 2017 18:01 |  #3

frugivore wrote in post #18249699 (external link)
I did the very same test years ago, only with the 24-70mm mark I. And got the same results. Canon does publish the angle of view of all theirs lenses. So I guess you can take that and pop it into a formula somewhere and get the effective focal length.

Canon lies, just like the rest. I recall when I first purchased my 20D, I had a 70-200mm zoom and a 17-85mm zoom, and the 70mm indication on the two lenses did not match the FOV!

With the 70-200mm mounted on 5D, at a distance of 119cm (46.85") the camera should see 38.4cm along the short dimension of the frame. What it sees is about 30cm, as seen here:

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/POTN%202013%20Post%20Mar1/70mm%20FOV%2070%20200_zpsd5eu9bwx.jpg

...which is the FOV of 88mm FL.


Here is the Canon 100mm lens at the same camera position. It should see 26.16cm, it sees:

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/POTN%202013%20Post%20Mar1/100%20FOV%20100_zpsvrlmscoh.jpg

...about 24.25cm, which is about 107mm

Lastly, 100mm on 70-200mm lens, which also should see 26.16cm but sees 24.25cm:


...at least that is consistent with a dedicated 100mm lens from Canon

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigFilm
Member
58 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 153
Joined Mar 2015
Location: West Lafayette, IN
     
Jan 19, 2017 18:59 |  #4

You might have to rethink your procedure. The true definition of focal length is the distance from the senor to the focal point when the lens is focused at infinity. So if you focused the lens at infinity and measured 70mm from the sensor plane (the circle with line through on top of the camera), that would be where the focal point should be. Mark that location and then change lenses and repeat. Probably would be best done outdoors since you have to be at infinity for the correct locations.


Nikon user along with Zone VI view camera
More pictures at bjl0825.myportfolio.co​m (external link)
Thanks, Bob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
Post edited over 6 years ago by Tom Reichner.
     
Jan 19, 2017 19:05 |  #5

Jarvis Creative Studios wrote in post #18249693 (external link)
Is there a way to measure the "true" focal length of a lens?

Yes. But first you would have to come to a precise working definition of what 'focal point' is. There are many definitions, and many differences between those definitions. So in order to determine the actual focal point, you would first need to determine which definition you are going to measure for.


Here are a few of the most readily available definitions for 'focal point':

Focal length (shown in red) is the distance between the center of a convex lens or a concave mirror and the focal point of the lens or mirror — the point where parallel rays of light meet, or converge

the distance from a lens to its focus

the distance between the imaging plane (e.g. the image chip in a digital camera) and a point where all light rays intersect inside the lens (the ‘optical center’). So a focal length of 20mm means that the distance from the optical center to the imaging plane is 20mm long

The focal length of a lens is the distance from the optical centre of the lens to the sensor (or film) when the lens is focused on an object at infinity.

When parallel rays of light hit a lens focused at infinity, they converge to form a focal point. The focal length of the lens is the distance from the middle of the lens to this focal point.


Hopefully the thing that you will get from all of these definitions is that the focal length of a lens is an actual physical distance between the lens element(s) itself(themselves) and the focal point of the lens, usually when the lens is focused at infinity. The focal length is not determined by field of view. That's right! Focal length is not determined by how wide the projected image is. It is determined by a measurement between the element itself (or optical centre in multi-element lenses) and the focal point.

Field of view is merely a by-product of focal length, not the essence of it.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by Wilt.
     
Jan 19, 2017 21:01 |  #6

For a 'simple lens' one can measure from the lens center to the plane of focus, to determine focal length

For a 'normal' lens, the same principle of distance from 'rear node' to focal plane is the focal length.
But for a 'telephoto' design lens, the rear node is CLOSER to the focal plane than the FL of the lens, and
for a 'retrofocus' design lens, the rear node is FARTHER FROM the focal plane than the FL of the lens!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jan 20, 2017 01:25 |  #7

Wilt wrote in post #18249866 (external link)
For a 'simple lens' one can measure from the lens center to the plane of focus, to determine focal length

For a 'normal' lens, the same principle of distance from 'rear node' to focal plane is the focal length.
But for a 'telephoto' design lens, the rear node is CLOSER to the focal plane than the FL of the lens, and
for a 'retrofocus' design lens, the rear node is FARTHER FROM the focal plane than the FL of the lens!


I think you have the tele/retrofocus statements off a little.in the telephoto case the rear node will be infront of the forward one, usually infront of the physical optics, i.e. focal length longer than length of lens. The retrofocus having the node again outside the physical lens but this time to the rear of it. The reason that ideal lenses are substituted so often is the complexity of modern lens designs.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by Wilt. (5 edits in all)
     
Jan 20, 2017 09:19 |  #8

BigAl007 wrote in post #18250042 (external link)
I think you have the tele/retrofocus statements off a little.in the telephoto case the rear node will be infront of the forward one, usually infront of the physical optics, i.e. focal length longer than length of lens. The retrofocus having the node again outside the physical lens but this time to the rear of it. The reason that ideal lenses are substituted so often is the complexity of modern lens designs.

Alan


Alan, what I indeed wanted to say:
For the 'Telephoto' lens the Image Distance is shorter with Telephoto designs than with Normal designs. So if FL of a Telephoto lens is 500mm, the distance from the rear optic to the Focal Plane is shorter than the Rear Node distance (e.g. image distance is 200mm vs. 500m FL).

Just like describing an elephant there are multiple characteristics, all true.

  • Yes, what you describe is indeed an effect of Telephoto design, that the rear nodal plane is forward of the optical center of the lens, where the rear nodal plane is one FL in front of the film plane.
  • Another characteristic is that a telephoto lens is a a long-focus lens in which the physical length of the lens is shorter than the focal length.


Contrary to your wording, however, for the 70-200mm while the rear node is indeed AT the front of the lens at 200mm FL, it is WITHIN the lens at 70mm FL!

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,677 views & 1 like for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Is there a way to measure the "true" focal length of a lens?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
935 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.