Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 21 Jan 2017 (Saturday) 01:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Reflections

 
swbkrun
Goldmember
Avatar
1,190 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 641
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Washington
     
Jan 21, 2017 01:16 |  #1

I believe it's almost a catch 22 but I could be wrong....

How do you position yourself to avoid the reflections in the eyes of pups? If we rotate you will lose the color in their eyes, and they look flat (or dark). By positioning in the sun I feel like I can really get the eyes to pop, however you start getting reflections. Thoughts or advice??

Here are a couple samples

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Pets/Dogs/i-ML9hdBs/0/X3/IMG_2802-PsEdit-X3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …02-PsEdit-X3.jpg&lb=1&s=A  (external link) on Smugmug

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Family/Chelan-Winterfest/i-qzJbnX2/0/X3/IMG_2880-PsEdit-X3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …80-PsEdit-X3.jpg&lb=1&s=A  (external link) on Smugmug

http://averymckenna.sm​ugmug.com/ (external link)
"When I stand before God @ the end of my life, I would hope that I would not have a single bit of talent left, and I could say, 'I used everything you gave me.'"
Erma Bombeck

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
98kellrs
Senior Member
Avatar
841 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 710
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Jan 21, 2017 02:08 |  #2

Best way is to shoot from further away using a longer lens, you can also position yourself so you sit in the non-reflective part of the eye.


Ryan
Nikon D800
Fujifilm X-T1
RSK Photography Facebook - Automotive Photography page (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,511 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Jan 21, 2017 07:56 |  #3

As you posted in the Critique Corner, here it comes.

The highlights in the eyes have more prominence partly because they're blown out. That's because your camera's light meter saw a black dog and tried to make it 18% gray. You need to reduce the exposure.

I realize from your post that your interest is in the eyes. However, you can't avoid other aspects that detract from the photo overall. The color balance in the shot with the out of focus nose looks a little off. Maybe too blue? Is it a blue dog or a black one? And the nose -- a smaller aperture or more distance from the camera would have put it more in focus. The eyes are the most important, but one should not take a portrait where other parts of the face are severely out of focus.

I can't tell if the second one is a selective color shot. But it looks like one. The collar is not the subject, but it draws the eye. It would be perfect as a commercial shot advertising the collar. The movement blur white thing (falling piece of ice?) below the collar on the right side should be cloned out. I would also clone out the reeds(?) that appear to be growing out of the dog's head. The well-formed snowflake on the ear is a serendipitous bit of fortune. It's a nice touch.

If the shot is selective color, my advice would be to outgrow this period in your photographic journey with due haste. It is considered by experienced photographers as the sign of a beginner or student. It has it's places, but it must be done artistically. Most of the time it comes across as tacky. It's says that the photographer was not confident in his/her composition/exposure/p​osing and had to tell the viewer, "Look here. This is what you're supposed to notice."

See how you like it with less tight cropping. These are a little tight to me. Others may differ. However, you didn't leave much space for a frame if these were to be printed.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,434 views & 3 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Reflections
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1201 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.