Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 25 Jan 2017 (Wednesday) 11:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6d vs 5d mark ii with my kit?

 
Luigi1234
Member
49 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2016
Post edited over 6 years ago by Luigi1234.
     
Jan 25, 2017 11:07 |  #1

Hello,

I am a low budget wedding photographer, averaging about $1200 per wedding for service only.
My 40D backup to my 5dMark ii has given out and I am wondering if it would be best to purchase a new or used 5d mark iii, or a new 6d. I know it depends on my budget, but let's say I wouldn't mind saving $1000 and putting that into a new lens. What would you purchase if you knew you'll be doing wedding photography for years to come, but aren't necessarily wealthy.... and why?

Current gear:

580ex ii x2
5d mark ii
24-70mm ii 2.8
70-200mm 2.8
50mm 1.2 zeiss




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dasmith232
Senior Member
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 381
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Monument, CO, USA
     
Jan 25, 2017 11:44 |  #2

I think that (good) auto-focus is pretty important for weddings. It certainly is the case for me. I use a 6D and a 5D3 for weddings. On the 6D, the center focus point is excellent. It's still not quite as good as the 5D3, but not much else is that good.

However, as soon as I go for a side focus point on the 6D, I get a lot more focus hunting. When I first got the 6D (when it first came out) I was also using a 60D. I found the 60D would outperform the 6D on the side (or non-center) focus points.

Personally, I wouldn't want to shoot anything that was fast-paced or time-critical in sometimes challenging lighting. For me, that would not be the 6D.

You've already got a couple of lenses that are "standard" for weddings without showing a strong need or gap there. I'd probably lean towards the 5D3 over the 6D.


Dave
Mostly using Canon bodies with lots of different lenses and flash.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:07 |  #3

The 5d3 would work very well for all areas of a wedding including reception work except for one thing.... low light AF acquisition.

The 6d will do better in those poorly lit halls during a father/daughter dance or group cha cha.

Either would be a step up from the 5d2 though.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tigerkn
Goldmember
4,119 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Feb 2009
Location: CA
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:14 |  #4

https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=18254242


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Gears (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luigi1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
49 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2016
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:34 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #5

First, thank you for your response.
It's interesting you say this because after renting out the 6D for a wedding, during the dancing (end of reception) I had to switch back to my 5d mark ii because it would take twice as long for it to focus on a person dancing than the 5d......
Could that mean the 6d was defective?
Unfortunately it was a very lit reception hall so the only time I got to test the 6d in low lighting was during the not so important guest dancing part, so I'm not sure how much of a limitation the 6d will be for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luigi1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
49 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2016
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:36 as a reply to  @ dasmith232's post |  #6

Thank you for your response, it's funny you bring up auto focus.. I was originally going to discuss that in my question before I decided to keep it more simple.
After renting out the 6D for a wedding, during the dancing (end of reception) I had to switch back to my 5d mark ii because it would take twice as long for it to focus on a person dancing than the 5d......
Could that mean the 6d was defective?
Unfortunately it was a very lit reception hall so the only time I got to test the 6d in low lighting was during the not so important guest dancing part, so I'm not sure how much of a limitation the 6d will be for me.
I've only ever used the center focus point alone, in case that matters.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 374 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 2433
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:38 |  #7

5D3 hands down. built tougher, more af cross points... been the wedding champ for a long time with reason.
2 card slots!

6D - eh.. I use my outer points ALL the time.. and I had a 5D2 that drove me nuts on those.

Plus, ergonomically, the 5D2 and 5D3 are very similar, easier to switch back and forth.


Godox/Flashpoint r2 system, plus some canon stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:40 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

dasmith232 wrote in post #18255106 (external link)
I think that (good) auto-focus is pretty important for weddings. It certainly is the case for me. I use a 6D and a 5D3 for weddings. On the 6D, the center focus point is excellent. It's still not quite as good as the 5D3, but not much else is that good.

However, as soon as I go for a side focus point on the 6D, I get a lot more focus hunting. When I first got the 6D (when it first came out) I was also using a 60D. I found the 60D would outperform the 6D on the side (or non-center) focus points.

Personally, I wouldn't want to shoot anything that was fast-paced or time-critical in sometimes challenging lighting. For me, that would not be the 6D.

You've already got a couple of lenses that are "standard" for weddings without showing a strong need or gap there. I'd probably lean towards the 5D3 over the 6D.


I agree with everything Dave says. My 60D was better (off-center AF point) than my 6D is. I love my 6D, but it is center-point only. I don't use it for moving targets, either. I have a 1DIV and 80D for that stuff.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dasmith232
Senior Member
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 381
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Monument, CO, USA
     
Jan 25, 2017 12:43 |  #9

I don't have any experience with the 5D2. I've heard many references to the 5D2 vs the 5D3 and how the AF is significantly improved and drawing a parallel or similarities between the 5D2 and the 6D. It's interesting that you found them to be different.

To me, the center point on the 6D is excellent. But you had some difficulty with it. I'm wondering: what focus points were you using?

My perspective on the 5D3 vs the 6D comes from owning and using them both. Although, I tend to put the faster lenses on the 5D3 which gives it an "unfair" advantage.


Dave
Mostly using Canon bodies with lots of different lenses and flash.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luigi1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
49 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2016
     
Jan 25, 2017 13:16 as a reply to  @ ksbal's post |  #10

Those are some very good points. Thank you for your feedback.
Am I missing out by not using outer focus points? I just never have... I feel like they can be unreliable when compared to center point and reframing the shot, but I haven't taken the time to really learn how to use them so I may be wrong.

Otherwise, I wouldn't mind not having amazing off-center points if I can save $1000+ on a 6d. Now a used 5diii is only a couple hundred more, that's why I'm debating.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luigi1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
49 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2016
     
Jan 25, 2017 13:18 as a reply to  @ Bassat's post |  #11

Do you know how the center point compares to the center point on the 5d mark ii with respect to speed in locking in moving subjects in low lighting into focus? After trying out the 6d along with my 5d mark 2, I noticed the 6d would take longer to snap into focus in these circumstances. This is basically the only thing deterring me from going with the 6d, everything else seemed to work just fine, and well, compared to my 5d2, even better in some ways. 5d3 seems like could be overkill for me with 1200$ weddings.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
3Rotor
Senior Member
953 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 802
Joined May 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Post edited over 6 years ago by 3Rotor.
     
Jan 25, 2017 13:58 |  #12

I prefer to select focus with AF points in my composition rather than focus and recompose. There's a shift in focus when you focus and recompose. It may not be very apparent with subjects far away but it's very noticeable with closer subjects. Especially when shooting with low DOF. Some have complained of soft images and come to find out, they are focusing and recomposing.

The 5D3 may seem a bit pricey but you'll have it easily paid off after two weddings.


Instagram (external link)
www.jessemak.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 374 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 2433
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
Post edited over 6 years ago by ksbal. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 25, 2017 14:18 |  #13

Luigi1234 wrote in post #18255186 (external link)
I feel like they can be unreliable when compared to center point and reframing the shot, but I haven't taken the time to really learn how to use them so I may be wrong.

its not wrong, it just lets you nail focus, and not use the center point, at very shallow dof much better.

It is a very good thing you dont' use the outer points on the 5D2 - they are bad in low contrast situations. I don't know why the 6D center point was bad for you.. that center point on a 6D is suppose to be as good as the 5D2 or 5D3. But I've heard of things falling off (wheels/knobs), and the fact you'd have to go buy SD cards, instead of swapping CF cards back and forth.. but either will have the same battery, a plus...


Godox/Flashpoint r2 system, plus some canon stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 25, 2017 17:41 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

Luigi1234 wrote in post #18255190 (external link)
Do you know how the center point compares to the center point on the 5d mark ii with respect to speed in locking in moving subjects in low lighting into focus? After trying out the 6d along with my 5d mark 2, I noticed the 6d would take longer to snap into focus in these circumstances. This is basically the only thing deterring me from going with the 6d, everything else seemed to work just fine, and well, compared to my 5d2, even better in some ways. 5d3 seems like could be overkill for me with 1200$ weddings.

The 5D2 can focus down to 0EV; the 6D down to -3EV. I think the 6D is a huge improvement over the 5D/5D2 in low light. One caveat, when I was using the 5D, I used mostly consumer zooms. In low light with the 6D, I am using fast (f/1.8) primes. That results in an unfair comparison, really. It is my opinion that the 6D is much better in low light than the 5D was, but that may be biased by my choice of lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luigi1234
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
49 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2016
     
Jan 25, 2017 17:49 as a reply to  @ ksbal's post |  #15

Ksbal, what do you think I should use on the 6D when shooting moving subjects as during the first dance or fast pace dancing? One-Shot, Ai Servo?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,223 views & 1 like for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
6d vs 5d mark ii with my kit?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1433 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.