Has anyone used both the Canon 11-24 and the Sigma 12-24 Art?
Feedback? Commentss
Feb 01, 2017 12:26 | #1 Has anyone used both the Canon 11-24 and the Sigma 12-24 Art?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2017 13:59 | #2 I was about to ask something like this too. I was looking for an ultra wide (10-12 on the wide end) for a crop sensor. I haven't seen the Canon 11-24 or Sigma 12-24. I've come across a Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24 & a Tokina 11-16. No clue which one is the best buy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | The Canon 10-22 will be wider on a crop than the ultra-expensive 11-24. You'd need to use the 11-24 on a FF camera to get the benefit of the ultra-wide 11mm. The 10-22 on an APS-C sensor will be an equivalent to 16-35 FF, which is pretty wide, but nowhere near the 11-24.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2017 14:11 | #4 the 11-24 is good, but super fat and pretty darn heavy. Reviews put the sigma slightly behind, but in the same league. You either use rear gels for ND's or super awkward 150mm filters. 11 is a nice POV if you care about verticals. I shoot 10mm on FF often, can make for some dramatic shots. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jabtas Goldmember More info | Feb 01, 2017 14:15 | #5 Not sure what body you using, but if its a crop check out the Canon 10-18mm STM Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2017 17:50 | #6 I own the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 and have been very satisfied with the results. Considered a manual focus prime since it's for landscapes and astro, but figured the zoom would allow me to reframe without having to foot-zoom and the AF would make it more versatile than a manual focus lens. PhotographicMemoriesCT.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 03, 2017 21:28 | #7 harveyhaddixfan wrote in post #18261749 I was about to ask something like this too. I was looking for an ultra wide (10-12 on the wide end) for a crop sensor. I haven't seen the Canon 11-24 or Sigma 12-24. I've come across a Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24 & a Tokina 11-16. No clue which one is the best buy. For the price of a 11-24 to use on your crop camera, you can buy a new 6d and a 16-35/4 and have money left over and have better images. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nethawked Senior Member More info | Feb 06, 2017 11:01 | #8 harveyhaddixfan wrote in post #18261749 I was about to ask something like this too. I was looking for an ultra wide (10-12 on the wide end) for a crop sensor. I haven't seen the Canon 11-24 or Sigma 12-24. I've come across a Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24 & a Tokina 11-16. No clue which one is the best buy. I fell in love with the 10-22mm when I had it. Sweet lens for the price and there are probably good deals for used lenses. I wouldn't consider either the Canon or Sigma for FF.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2017 12:51 | #9 FEChariot wrote in post #18264149 For the price of a 11-24 to use on your crop camera, you can buy a new 6d and a 16-35/4 and have money left over and have better images. I love my 6D and 16-35 f/4 The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. - Antoine de Saint Exupéry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2017 13:35 | #10 Nethawked wrote in post #18266079 I fell in love with the 10-22mm when I had it. Sweet lens for the price and there are probably good deals for used lenses. I wouldn't consider either the Canon or Sigma for FF. I found a deal on here for the 10-22mm with a hood for $285 delivered and jumped on it. I can't wait to get outside and use it. This is a comparison of the wide end of my 18-135 and the 10-22. Image hosted by forum (838733) © harveyhaddixfan [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. | Feb 13, 2017 08:41 | #11 The Sigma 12-24 is nice because it works on both the crop and FF bodies. The Tokina 11-16 works on a FF too, but is most trouble-free at 16mm, I treat it as a 16mm f2.8 prime on the 5D. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
i am leaning towards the Sigma --thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yep, great lens for the money ad IS. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1220 guests, 117 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||